吲哚、丁酸和硼酸在红豆茎插条生根中的作用

F. C. M. Gonçalves, M. D. Nasser, Lucas Lencioni Arruda, G. Ferreira, E. Ono, J. Rodrigues
{"title":"吲哚、丁酸和硼酸在红豆茎插条生根中的作用","authors":"F. C. M. Gonçalves, M. D. Nasser, Lucas Lencioni Arruda, G. Ferreira, E. Ono, J. Rodrigues","doi":"10.17265/2161-6264/2018.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of indole butyric acid (IBA) and boric acid to induce rooting on atemoya “Thompson” cuttings. A randomized block design with 10 treatments and four blocks was laid out. The treatments consisted in the use of different levels of IBA (i.e., 0, 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 mg/L) with or without boric acid at 150 mg/L. The cuttings were placed to root in expanded polystyrene (EPS) trays with 72 cells and kept in a greenhouse under misting. At 120 d after planting, leaf dry and fresh masses (g), root dry and fresh masses (g), percentage of rooting, live cuttings (LC), live cuttings with callus (LCC), number of roots per cuttings and number of emitted leaves (NEL) were evaluated. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and comparison of means by Tukey test at 5% probability. Results indicated no statistically significant differences in both application methods (separate or associated with boric acid) for all evaluated variables, except for LC, in which boric acid provided higher survival rates. It could be concluded that the propagation method using either separate IBA application or associated with boric acid is unsuitable to induce rooting on atemoya “Thompson” cuttings.","PeriodicalId":70192,"journal":{"name":"农业科学与技术:B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indole Butyric and Boric Acids in the Rooting of Atemoya “Thompson” Stem Cuttings\",\"authors\":\"F. C. M. Gonçalves, M. D. Nasser, Lucas Lencioni Arruda, G. Ferreira, E. Ono, J. Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.17265/2161-6264/2018.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of indole butyric acid (IBA) and boric acid to induce rooting on atemoya “Thompson” cuttings. A randomized block design with 10 treatments and four blocks was laid out. The treatments consisted in the use of different levels of IBA (i.e., 0, 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 mg/L) with or without boric acid at 150 mg/L. The cuttings were placed to root in expanded polystyrene (EPS) trays with 72 cells and kept in a greenhouse under misting. At 120 d after planting, leaf dry and fresh masses (g), root dry and fresh masses (g), percentage of rooting, live cuttings (LC), live cuttings with callus (LCC), number of roots per cuttings and number of emitted leaves (NEL) were evaluated. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and comparison of means by Tukey test at 5% probability. Results indicated no statistically significant differences in both application methods (separate or associated with boric acid) for all evaluated variables, except for LC, in which boric acid provided higher survival rates. It could be concluded that the propagation method using either separate IBA application or associated with boric acid is unsuitable to induce rooting on atemoya “Thompson” cuttings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":70192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"农业科学与技术:B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"农业科学与技术:B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6264/2018.03.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"农业科学与技术:B","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6264/2018.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价吲哚丁酸(IBA)和硼酸对atemoya“Thompson”扦插生根的诱导效果。采用随机区组设计,共设10个处理和4个区组。这些处理包括使用不同水平的IBA(即0、500、1000、2000和4000 mg/L),添加或不添加150 mg/L硼酸。将插枝放置在有72个细胞的膨胀聚苯乙烯(EPS)托盘中生根,并在喷雾下保存在温室中。植后120 d,测定叶片干鲜质量(g)、根系干鲜质量(g)、生根率、活插条(LC)、带愈伤组织活插条(LCC)、每插条根数和出叶数(NEL)。数据采用5%概率的Tukey检验进行方差分析和均值比较。结果显示,两种应用方法(单独或与硼酸相关)在所有评估变量上没有统计学上的显著差异,除了LC,其中硼酸提供更高的存活率。结果表明,单独施用IBA或配施硼酸均不适合在红豆扦插上生根。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indole Butyric and Boric Acids in the Rooting of Atemoya “Thompson” Stem Cuttings
The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of indole butyric acid (IBA) and boric acid to induce rooting on atemoya “Thompson” cuttings. A randomized block design with 10 treatments and four blocks was laid out. The treatments consisted in the use of different levels of IBA (i.e., 0, 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 mg/L) with or without boric acid at 150 mg/L. The cuttings were placed to root in expanded polystyrene (EPS) trays with 72 cells and kept in a greenhouse under misting. At 120 d after planting, leaf dry and fresh masses (g), root dry and fresh masses (g), percentage of rooting, live cuttings (LC), live cuttings with callus (LCC), number of roots per cuttings and number of emitted leaves (NEL) were evaluated. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and comparison of means by Tukey test at 5% probability. Results indicated no statistically significant differences in both application methods (separate or associated with boric acid) for all evaluated variables, except for LC, in which boric acid provided higher survival rates. It could be concluded that the propagation method using either separate IBA application or associated with boric acid is unsuitable to induce rooting on atemoya “Thompson” cuttings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
773
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信