公共部门审计委员会效能的动力驱动因素

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Philna Coetzee, L. Erasmus, M. Pududu, S. Malan, Audrey Legodi
{"title":"公共部门审计委员会效能的动力驱动因素","authors":"Philna Coetzee, L. Erasmus, M. Pududu, S. Malan, Audrey Legodi","doi":"10.1080/10291954.2022.2128556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Audit committees are often implicated as accomplices in governance failures, or slow to react to findings. The power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness in developing countries is an under-researched area. With the progress of developing countries threatened by malfeasance, research on public sector audit committee organisational power, contributes to the conversation on power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness in developing countries. The paper identified power drivers, through exploratory induction, that should support South African public sector audit committee effectiveness. Focus group discussions were analysed applying Interactive Qualitative Analysis methodology. The drivers are linked to Kalbers and Fogarty’s study on the power typology of organisational power theory, which posits power as an antecedent to effectiveness. The study concludes that three central themes provide power to the South African public sector audit committees, namely political climate; individual and collective audit committee competence; and the independence of the audit committee. The paper also modestly extends the organisational power theory in respect of the elements of power.","PeriodicalId":43731,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"62 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"Philna Coetzee, L. Erasmus, M. Pududu, S. Malan, Audrey Legodi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10291954.2022.2128556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Audit committees are often implicated as accomplices in governance failures, or slow to react to findings. The power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness in developing countries is an under-researched area. With the progress of developing countries threatened by malfeasance, research on public sector audit committee organisational power, contributes to the conversation on power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness in developing countries. The paper identified power drivers, through exploratory induction, that should support South African public sector audit committee effectiveness. Focus group discussions were analysed applying Interactive Qualitative Analysis methodology. The drivers are linked to Kalbers and Fogarty’s study on the power typology of organisational power theory, which posits power as an antecedent to effectiveness. The study concludes that three central themes provide power to the South African public sector audit committees, namely political climate; individual and collective audit committee competence; and the independence of the audit committee. The paper also modestly extends the organisational power theory in respect of the elements of power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"62 - 84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2022.2128556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2022.2128556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

审计委员会经常被牵连为治理失败的帮凶,或者对调查结果反应迟钝。发展中国家公共部门审计委员会有效性的动力驱动因素是一个研究不足的领域。随着发展中国家的进步受到渎职行为的威胁,对公共部门审计委员会组织权力的研究,有助于讨论发展中国家公共部门审计委员有效性的权力驱动因素。该文件通过探索性归纳确定了应支持南非公共部门审计委员会有效性的动力驱动因素。焦点小组讨论采用互动定性分析方法进行分析。这些驱动因素与Kalbers和Fogarty对组织权力理论的权力类型学研究有关,该理论将权力视为有效性的前提。研究得出的结论是,三个中心主题为南非公共部门审计委员会提供了权力,即政治气候;个人和集体审计委员会的能力;审计委员会的独立性。本文还适度地扩展了组织权力理论中的权力要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness
Audit committees are often implicated as accomplices in governance failures, or slow to react to findings. The power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness in developing countries is an under-researched area. With the progress of developing countries threatened by malfeasance, research on public sector audit committee organisational power, contributes to the conversation on power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness in developing countries. The paper identified power drivers, through exploratory induction, that should support South African public sector audit committee effectiveness. Focus group discussions were analysed applying Interactive Qualitative Analysis methodology. The drivers are linked to Kalbers and Fogarty’s study on the power typology of organisational power theory, which posits power as an antecedent to effectiveness. The study concludes that three central themes provide power to the South African public sector audit committees, namely political climate; individual and collective audit committee competence; and the independence of the audit committee. The paper also modestly extends the organisational power theory in respect of the elements of power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信