本土水果的估价与后殖民思维:寻找发展的替代方案

Q4 Social Sciences
R. O. Silva, Julian Perez-Cassarino, José Edmilson de Souza-Lima, W. Steenbock
{"title":"本土水果的估价与后殖民思维:寻找发展的替代方案","authors":"R. O. Silva, Julian Perez-Cassarino, José Edmilson de Souza-Lima, W. Steenbock","doi":"10.18472/sustdeb.v10n2.2019.22029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to identify the influence of two paradigms, namely colonial thinking and postcolonial thinking, on the valuation of native fruits, The sample was composed of six groups of farmers from the agroecology center Luta Camponesa Nucleus, which is linked to the agroecology network Rede Ecovida de Agroecologia, and the methodological procedures were based on the principles of action research. It concludes that the colonial thinking contributes to the elimination of native fruits, as a result of epistemicide, the advancement of the green revolution, and the food empires. On the other hand, the postcolonial thinking valorizes native fruits, especially through the ecology of knowledges, agroecology, and short circuits.","PeriodicalId":37646,"journal":{"name":"Sustentabilidade em Debate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valuation of native fruits and postcolonial thinking: a search for alternatives to development\",\"authors\":\"R. O. Silva, Julian Perez-Cassarino, José Edmilson de Souza-Lima, W. Steenbock\",\"doi\":\"10.18472/sustdeb.v10n2.2019.22029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to identify the influence of two paradigms, namely colonial thinking and postcolonial thinking, on the valuation of native fruits, The sample was composed of six groups of farmers from the agroecology center Luta Camponesa Nucleus, which is linked to the agroecology network Rede Ecovida de Agroecologia, and the methodological procedures were based on the principles of action research. It concludes that the colonial thinking contributes to the elimination of native fruits, as a result of epistemicide, the advancement of the green revolution, and the food empires. On the other hand, the postcolonial thinking valorizes native fruits, especially through the ecology of knowledges, agroecology, and short circuits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustentabilidade em Debate\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustentabilidade em Debate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18472/sustdeb.v10n2.2019.22029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustentabilidade em Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18472/sustdeb.v10n2.2019.22029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在确定殖民思维和后殖民思维两种范式对本土水果估价的影响。样本由农业生态学中心Luta Camponesa Nucleus的六组农民组成,该中心与农业生态学网络Rede Ecovida de Agroecologia相连,方法论程序以行动研究原则为基础。它得出的结论是,殖民思想有助于消除本土水果,这是认识论杀戮、绿色革命和粮食帝国的进步的结果。另一方面,后殖民思想对乡土水果进行了估价,特别是通过知识生态学、农业生态学和短路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Valuation of native fruits and postcolonial thinking: a search for alternatives to development
This research aims to identify the influence of two paradigms, namely colonial thinking and postcolonial thinking, on the valuation of native fruits, The sample was composed of six groups of farmers from the agroecology center Luta Camponesa Nucleus, which is linked to the agroecology network Rede Ecovida de Agroecologia, and the methodological procedures were based on the principles of action research. It concludes that the colonial thinking contributes to the elimination of native fruits, as a result of epistemicide, the advancement of the green revolution, and the food empires. On the other hand, the postcolonial thinking valorizes native fruits, especially through the ecology of knowledges, agroecology, and short circuits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustentabilidade em Debate
Sustentabilidade em Debate Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Publish original texts, based on interdisciplinary research, with the potential for achieving strong impact on research agendas in the fields of sustainable development and environmental policies, as well as on the promotion of sustainability, in different scales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信