负荷搬运对下肢截肢步行膝关节负荷及代谢成本的影响:初步建模研究

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Tylan N. Templin, G. Klute, R. Neptune
{"title":"负荷搬运对下肢截肢步行膝关节负荷及代谢成本的影响:初步建模研究","authors":"Tylan N. Templin, G. Klute, R. Neptune","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction For able-bodied individuals, the mechanical output from the ankle muscles is modulated to meet the altered demands of load carriage. However, for individuals with a lower-limb amputation, the stiffness properties of standard-of-care prosthetic feet do not change with varying load conditions. Thus, individuals with amputation often develop gait asymmetries during load carriage that increase their risk for developing overuse injuries such as in the intact knee and increase the metabolic cost of walking relative to able-bodied individuals. The purpose of this preliminary study was to assess the influence of load carriage technique on knee joint loading and metabolic cost during gait of an individual with a below-knee amputation using a forward dynamics simulation framework. Methods Simulations were generated to track the experimental walking data of individuals with amputation for 3 loading conditions (unloaded, front load, and back load). Results These simulations showed that individuals with amputation rely on their intact limb as a compensatory strategy to meet the increased demands of carrying a load. Carrying a back load was found to increase intact knee joint loading relative to carrying a front load but reduced metabolic cost. Conclusion The tradeoff between joint loading and metabolic cost should be considered when determining the appropriate load carriage technique. Future work should focus on improving prosthetic foot designs to help reduce joint loading asymmetry and elevated metabolic cost during different loading conditions for individuals with lower-limb amputation.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"33 1","pages":"118 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Load Carriage on Knee Joint Loading and Metabolic Cost on Walking with Lower-Limb Amputation: A Preliminary Modeling Study\",\"authors\":\"Tylan N. Templin, G. Klute, R. Neptune\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction For able-bodied individuals, the mechanical output from the ankle muscles is modulated to meet the altered demands of load carriage. However, for individuals with a lower-limb amputation, the stiffness properties of standard-of-care prosthetic feet do not change with varying load conditions. Thus, individuals with amputation often develop gait asymmetries during load carriage that increase their risk for developing overuse injuries such as in the intact knee and increase the metabolic cost of walking relative to able-bodied individuals. The purpose of this preliminary study was to assess the influence of load carriage technique on knee joint loading and metabolic cost during gait of an individual with a below-knee amputation using a forward dynamics simulation framework. Methods Simulations were generated to track the experimental walking data of individuals with amputation for 3 loading conditions (unloaded, front load, and back load). Results These simulations showed that individuals with amputation rely on their intact limb as a compensatory strategy to meet the increased demands of carrying a load. Carrying a back load was found to increase intact knee joint loading relative to carrying a front load but reduced metabolic cost. Conclusion The tradeoff between joint loading and metabolic cost should be considered when determining the appropriate load carriage technique. Future work should focus on improving prosthetic foot designs to help reduce joint loading asymmetry and elevated metabolic cost during different loading conditions for individuals with lower-limb amputation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"118 - 124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要简介:对于身体健全的人来说,脚踝肌肉的机械输出是经过调节的,以满足负荷运输的变化需求。然而,对于下肢截肢患者,标准护理假肢脚的硬度特性不会随着负荷条件的变化而变化。因此,截肢患者在负重过程中经常出现步态不对称,这增加了他们过度使用损伤的风险,例如完整的膝盖,并增加了相对于健全人走路的代谢成本。本初步研究的目的是使用正向动力学模拟框架评估负荷搬运技术对膝下截肢患者步态中膝关节负荷和代谢成本的影响。方法模拟截肢患者在3种负荷条件下(空载、前负荷和后负荷)的实验行走数据。结果这些模拟表明,截肢患者依靠其完整的肢体作为补偿策略,以满足日益增加的负荷需求。研究发现,与前部负荷相比,背部负荷增加了完整的膝关节负荷,但降低了代谢成本。结论在确定合适的载物技术时,应考虑联合载物和代谢成本之间的权衡。未来的工作应该集中在改进假肢脚的设计上,以帮助减少下肢截肢患者在不同负荷条件下的关节负荷不对称和代谢成本升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of Load Carriage on Knee Joint Loading and Metabolic Cost on Walking with Lower-Limb Amputation: A Preliminary Modeling Study
ABSTRACT Introduction For able-bodied individuals, the mechanical output from the ankle muscles is modulated to meet the altered demands of load carriage. However, for individuals with a lower-limb amputation, the stiffness properties of standard-of-care prosthetic feet do not change with varying load conditions. Thus, individuals with amputation often develop gait asymmetries during load carriage that increase their risk for developing overuse injuries such as in the intact knee and increase the metabolic cost of walking relative to able-bodied individuals. The purpose of this preliminary study was to assess the influence of load carriage technique on knee joint loading and metabolic cost during gait of an individual with a below-knee amputation using a forward dynamics simulation framework. Methods Simulations were generated to track the experimental walking data of individuals with amputation for 3 loading conditions (unloaded, front load, and back load). Results These simulations showed that individuals with amputation rely on their intact limb as a compensatory strategy to meet the increased demands of carrying a load. Carrying a back load was found to increase intact knee joint loading relative to carrying a front load but reduced metabolic cost. Conclusion The tradeoff between joint loading and metabolic cost should be considered when determining the appropriate load carriage technique. Future work should focus on improving prosthetic foot designs to help reduce joint loading asymmetry and elevated metabolic cost during different loading conditions for individuals with lower-limb amputation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信