不兼容?社会主义,学术界,民粹主义

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Populism Pub Date : 2018-12-04 DOI:10.1163/25888072-00001017
T. Brass
{"title":"不兼容?社会主义,学术界,民粹主义","authors":"T. Brass","doi":"10.1163/25888072-00001017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traced here is the historical role of academia in the way revolution and socialism have vanished from the leftist agenda, together with its political and ideological effects and implications. Thus a similar path was followed from the late 19th century onwards by the reformism/revisionism of katheder-socialists, and from the 1980s onwards by the ‘new’ populist postmodernism in academia. Both privileged culture and reified peasant and ethnic identity, thereby replacing Marxist theory and concepts (class, revolution, socialism, state capture) with other forms of empowerment (parliamentary, resistance-to-the-state) that did not involve a transcendence of the accumulation process. In each instance, reformist/revisionist compromise with capitalism, together with a failure to address both the presence of the industrial reserve army labour and the resulting intensification of labour market competition, has helped to pave the way for the rise of the far right.","PeriodicalId":29733,"journal":{"name":"Populism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/25888072-00001017","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Incompatibles? Socialism, Academia, Populism\",\"authors\":\"T. Brass\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/25888072-00001017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traced here is the historical role of academia in the way revolution and socialism have vanished from the leftist agenda, together with its political and ideological effects and implications. Thus a similar path was followed from the late 19th century onwards by the reformism/revisionism of katheder-socialists, and from the 1980s onwards by the ‘new’ populist postmodernism in academia. Both privileged culture and reified peasant and ethnic identity, thereby replacing Marxist theory and concepts (class, revolution, socialism, state capture) with other forms of empowerment (parliamentary, resistance-to-the-state) that did not involve a transcendence of the accumulation process. In each instance, reformist/revisionist compromise with capitalism, together with a failure to address both the presence of the industrial reserve army labour and the resulting intensification of labour market competition, has helped to pave the way for the rise of the far right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Populism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/25888072-00001017\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Populism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-00001017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Populism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-00001017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这里追溯了学术界在革命和社会主义从左翼议程中消失的过程中所扮演的历史角色,以及它的政治和意识形态影响和含义。因此,从19世纪后期开始,类似的道路被神学社会主义者的改良主义/修正主义所遵循,以及从20世纪80年代开始,学术界的“新”民粹主义后现代主义所遵循。特权文化和具体化的农民和民族身份,从而用其他形式的授权(议会、对国家的抵抗)取代了马克思主义的理论和概念(阶级、革命、社会主义、国家占领),而这些授权不涉及对积累过程的超越。在每一个例子中,改良主义者/修正主义者与资本主义的妥协,加上未能解决工业后备军劳动力的存在和由此导致的劳动力市场竞争加剧的问题,都为极右翼的崛起铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Incompatibles? Socialism, Academia, Populism
Traced here is the historical role of academia in the way revolution and socialism have vanished from the leftist agenda, together with its political and ideological effects and implications. Thus a similar path was followed from the late 19th century onwards by the reformism/revisionism of katheder-socialists, and from the 1980s onwards by the ‘new’ populist postmodernism in academia. Both privileged culture and reified peasant and ethnic identity, thereby replacing Marxist theory and concepts (class, revolution, socialism, state capture) with other forms of empowerment (parliamentary, resistance-to-the-state) that did not involve a transcendence of the accumulation process. In each instance, reformist/revisionist compromise with capitalism, together with a failure to address both the presence of the industrial reserve army labour and the resulting intensification of labour market competition, has helped to pave the way for the rise of the far right.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信