归类为“害虫”的野生动物:美国野生动物管理实践分析及其对自然生态系统的生态影响

Q3 Environmental Science
S. Ramdas
{"title":"归类为“害虫”的野生动物:美国野生动物管理实践分析及其对自然生态系统的生态影响","authors":"S. Ramdas","doi":"10.1080/10406026.2020.1851928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article emphasizes that contrary to widespread belief, indiscriminate hunting is neither a preventative nor a remedial method in reducing man–animal conflict situations. It highlights that hunting wildlife is not a sustainable or even a sound solution to man–animal conflict situations; mainly the article analyses the misaligned role played by the US regulatory bodies who seem to have lost touch with their respective statutory enactments’ principles and ideological goals. Like addressing the need for mitigating man–animal conflict situations without compromising on wildlife conservation and nature preservation.","PeriodicalId":11761,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Claims Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10406026.2020.1851928","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WILDLIFE CATEGORIZED as “VERMIN”: Analysis of the Wildlife Management Practices in the USA and Its Ecological Implications on Natural Ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"S. Ramdas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10406026.2020.1851928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article emphasizes that contrary to widespread belief, indiscriminate hunting is neither a preventative nor a remedial method in reducing man–animal conflict situations. It highlights that hunting wildlife is not a sustainable or even a sound solution to man–animal conflict situations; mainly the article analyses the misaligned role played by the US regulatory bodies who seem to have lost touch with their respective statutory enactments’ principles and ideological goals. Like addressing the need for mitigating man–animal conflict situations without compromising on wildlife conservation and nature preservation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Claims Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10406026.2020.1851928\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Claims Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2020.1851928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Claims Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2020.1851928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文强调,与普遍的看法相反,不分青红皂白的狩猎既不是预防也不是补救减少人兽冲突的方法。它强调,狩猎野生动物不是解决人与动物冲突局势的可持续办法,甚至不是一个合理的办法;本文主要分析了美国监管机构所扮演的错位角色,这些监管机构似乎已经与各自的法定法规原则和意识形态目标失去了联系。例如,在不损害野生动物保护和自然保护的情况下,解决缓解人兽冲突的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WILDLIFE CATEGORIZED as “VERMIN”: Analysis of the Wildlife Management Practices in the USA and Its Ecological Implications on Natural Ecosystems
Abstract This article emphasizes that contrary to widespread belief, indiscriminate hunting is neither a preventative nor a remedial method in reducing man–animal conflict situations. It highlights that hunting wildlife is not a sustainable or even a sound solution to man–animal conflict situations; mainly the article analyses the misaligned role played by the US regulatory bodies who seem to have lost touch with their respective statutory enactments’ principles and ideological goals. Like addressing the need for mitigating man–animal conflict situations without compromising on wildlife conservation and nature preservation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Claims Journal
Environmental Claims Journal Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The Environmental Claims Journal is a quarterly journal that focuses on the many types of claims and liabilities that result from environmental exposures. The ECJ considers environmental claims under older business insurance policies, coverage and claims under more recent environmental insurance policies, as well as toxic tort claims. Exposures and claims from all environmental media are considered: air, drinking water, groundwater, soil, chemicals in commerce and naturally occurring chemicals. The journal also considers the laws, regulations, and case law that form the basis for claims. The journal would be of interest to environmental and insurance attorneys, insurance professionals, claims professionals, and environmental consultants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信