融合话语中好客与种族的交集

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Joshua F. Hoops
{"title":"融合话语中好客与种族的交集","authors":"Joshua F. Hoops","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2020.1767629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper adopts a hospitality framework to analyze discourses of integration in the city of Antwerp. Anti-immigration and cultural racism have found a shared home in populist and nationalist movements in Europe, like the Flemish city that has become one significant site of tension between ideologically opposed groups on the subject of immigration. As such, hospitality coacts with discourses of race to mandate the adoption of dominant cultural norms by (im)migrant groups. In this paper, I unpack four discourses: (1) Not Belgium Anymore, (2) Belgian Complicity, (3) Intolerance of Intolerance, and (4) Interpersonal Knowledge, which emerged out of a critical ethnography comprised of participant observation and semi-structured interviews. This study on integration discourse complements extant research that has illuminated demonizing representations of immigrants as lazy, invading criminals, which is consequential as constructions of integration normalize and/or problematize restrictionist immigration policy. While each of these four discourses is complex, contested, and nuanced, they collectively presuppose a standard of assimilation for (im)migrants, whilst seeking to mitigate accusations of racism.","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17447143.2020.1767629","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersections of hospitality and race in integration discourse\",\"authors\":\"Joshua F. Hoops\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17447143.2020.1767629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper adopts a hospitality framework to analyze discourses of integration in the city of Antwerp. Anti-immigration and cultural racism have found a shared home in populist and nationalist movements in Europe, like the Flemish city that has become one significant site of tension between ideologically opposed groups on the subject of immigration. As such, hospitality coacts with discourses of race to mandate the adoption of dominant cultural norms by (im)migrant groups. In this paper, I unpack four discourses: (1) Not Belgium Anymore, (2) Belgian Complicity, (3) Intolerance of Intolerance, and (4) Interpersonal Knowledge, which emerged out of a critical ethnography comprised of participant observation and semi-structured interviews. This study on integration discourse complements extant research that has illuminated demonizing representations of immigrants as lazy, invading criminals, which is consequential as constructions of integration normalize and/or problematize restrictionist immigration policy. While each of these four discourses is complex, contested, and nuanced, they collectively presuppose a standard of assimilation for (im)migrants, whilst seeking to mitigate accusations of racism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multicultural Discourses\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17447143.2020.1767629\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multicultural Discourses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2020.1767629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2020.1767629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用款待框架来分析安特卫普市的整合话语。反移民和文化种族主义在欧洲的民粹主义和民族主义运动中找到了共同的归宿,比如佛兰德城市,它已成为意识形态对立的群体在移民问题上关系紧张的一个重要场所。因此,好客与种族话语合作,强制(非)移民群体采用占主导地位的文化规范。在本文中,我打开了四个话语:(1)不再是比利时,(2)比利时共谋,(3)不容忍的不容忍,以及(4)人际知识,这是从一个由参与者观察和半结构化访谈组成的批判性民族志中产生的。这项关于融合话语的研究补充了现有的研究,这些研究阐明了将移民妖魔化为懒惰的入侵罪犯,这是整合建设正常化和/或问题化限制主义移民政策的结果。虽然这四种论述都是复杂的、有争议的和微妙的,但它们共同预设了(非)移民的同化标准,同时试图减轻对种族主义的指责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intersections of hospitality and race in integration discourse
ABSTRACT This paper adopts a hospitality framework to analyze discourses of integration in the city of Antwerp. Anti-immigration and cultural racism have found a shared home in populist and nationalist movements in Europe, like the Flemish city that has become one significant site of tension between ideologically opposed groups on the subject of immigration. As such, hospitality coacts with discourses of race to mandate the adoption of dominant cultural norms by (im)migrant groups. In this paper, I unpack four discourses: (1) Not Belgium Anymore, (2) Belgian Complicity, (3) Intolerance of Intolerance, and (4) Interpersonal Knowledge, which emerged out of a critical ethnography comprised of participant observation and semi-structured interviews. This study on integration discourse complements extant research that has illuminated demonizing representations of immigrants as lazy, invading criminals, which is consequential as constructions of integration normalize and/or problematize restrictionist immigration policy. While each of these four discourses is complex, contested, and nuanced, they collectively presuppose a standard of assimilation for (im)migrants, whilst seeking to mitigate accusations of racism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信