光速的恒常性与单位匹配问题

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Alon Drory
{"title":"光速的恒常性与单位匹配问题","authors":"Alon Drory","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Space-time symmetries and the principle of relativity alone suffice to obtain Lorentz-like coordinate transformations, in which a free parameter, <em>k</em>, plays the part of <span><math><mrow><msup><mi>c</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span><span> in special relativity. Several authors have concluded that special relativity does not need the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light (the “second postulate”). I oppose this claim and argue that the transformations have no physical content unless different observers can ensure that they use the same units. The relativity of lengths and durations makes this non-trivial. One usually assumes boostability to solve this problem. I analyze this concept and show it is also non-trivial and cannot be assumed in general. The second postulate offers a way around this, as well as an economical method to match both time and length units. Without it, additional postulates are necessary to ground the physical meaning of the transformations.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 107-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.08.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constancy of the speed of light and the unit matching problem\",\"authors\":\"Alon Drory\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Space-time symmetries and the principle of relativity alone suffice to obtain Lorentz-like coordinate transformations, in which a free parameter, <em>k</em>, plays the part of <span><math><mrow><msup><mi>c</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span><span> in special relativity. Several authors have concluded that special relativity does not need the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light (the “second postulate”). I oppose this claim and argue that the transformations have no physical content unless different observers can ensure that they use the same units. The relativity of lengths and durations makes this non-trivial. One usually assumes boostability to solve this problem. I analyze this concept and show it is also non-trivial and cannot be assumed in general. The second postulate offers a way around this, as well as an economical method to match both time and length units. Without it, additional postulates are necessary to ground the physical meaning of the transformations.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 107-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219820301076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219820301076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仅时空对称性和相对性原理就足以获得类洛伦兹坐标变换,其中自由参数k在狭义相对论中扮演c−2的角色。一些作者已经得出结论,狭义相对论不需要光速恒定的假设(“第二假设”)。我反对这种说法,并认为除非不同的观察者能够确保它们使用相同的单位,否则转换没有物理内容。长度和持续时间的相对性使得这一点非常重要。人们通常假定可引导来解决这个问题。我分析了这个概念,并表明它也是非平凡的,不能一般地假设。第二个假设提供了一种解决方法,以及一种匹配时间和长度单位的经济方法。没有它,就需要附加的假设来为变换的物理意义奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constancy of the speed of light and the unit matching problem

Space-time symmetries and the principle of relativity alone suffice to obtain Lorentz-like coordinate transformations, in which a free parameter, k, plays the part of c2 in special relativity. Several authors have concluded that special relativity does not need the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light (the “second postulate”). I oppose this claim and argue that the transformations have no physical content unless different observers can ensure that they use the same units. The relativity of lengths and durations makes this non-trivial. One usually assumes boostability to solve this problem. I analyze this concept and show it is also non-trivial and cannot be assumed in general. The second postulate offers a way around this, as well as an economical method to match both time and length units. Without it, additional postulates are necessary to ground the physical meaning of the transformations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 物理-科学史与科学哲学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics is devoted to all aspects of the history and philosophy of modern physics broadly understood, including physical aspects of astronomy, chemistry and other non-biological sciences. The primary focus is on physics from the mid/late-nineteenth century to the present, the period of emergence of the kind of theoretical physics that has come to dominate the exact sciences in the twentieth century. The journal is internationally oriented with contributions from a wide range of perspectives. In addition to purely historical or philosophical papers, the editors particularly encourage papers that combine these two disciplines. The editors are also keen to publish papers of interest to physicists, as well as specialists in history and philosophy of physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信