{"title":"光速的恒常性与单位匹配问题","authors":"Alon Drory","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Space-time symmetries and the principle of relativity alone suffice to obtain Lorentz-like coordinate transformations, in which a free parameter, <em>k</em>, plays the part of <span><math><mrow><msup><mi>c</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span><span> in special relativity. Several authors have concluded that special relativity does not need the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light (the “second postulate”). I oppose this claim and argue that the transformations have no physical content unless different observers can ensure that they use the same units. The relativity of lengths and durations makes this non-trivial. One usually assumes boostability to solve this problem. I analyze this concept and show it is also non-trivial and cannot be assumed in general. The second postulate offers a way around this, as well as an economical method to match both time and length units. Without it, additional postulates are necessary to ground the physical meaning of the transformations.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 107-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.08.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constancy of the speed of light and the unit matching problem\",\"authors\":\"Alon Drory\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Space-time symmetries and the principle of relativity alone suffice to obtain Lorentz-like coordinate transformations, in which a free parameter, <em>k</em>, plays the part of <span><math><mrow><msup><mi>c</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span><span> in special relativity. Several authors have concluded that special relativity does not need the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light (the “second postulate”). I oppose this claim and argue that the transformations have no physical content unless different observers can ensure that they use the same units. The relativity of lengths and durations makes this non-trivial. One usually assumes boostability to solve this problem. I analyze this concept and show it is also non-trivial and cannot be assumed in general. The second postulate offers a way around this, as well as an economical method to match both time and length units. Without it, additional postulates are necessary to ground the physical meaning of the transformations.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 107-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219820301076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219820301076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constancy of the speed of light and the unit matching problem
Space-time symmetries and the principle of relativity alone suffice to obtain Lorentz-like coordinate transformations, in which a free parameter, k, plays the part of in special relativity. Several authors have concluded that special relativity does not need the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light (the “second postulate”). I oppose this claim and argue that the transformations have no physical content unless different observers can ensure that they use the same units. The relativity of lengths and durations makes this non-trivial. One usually assumes boostability to solve this problem. I analyze this concept and show it is also non-trivial and cannot be assumed in general. The second postulate offers a way around this, as well as an economical method to match both time and length units. Without it, additional postulates are necessary to ground the physical meaning of the transformations.
期刊介绍:
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics is devoted to all aspects of the history and philosophy of modern physics broadly understood, including physical aspects of astronomy, chemistry and other non-biological sciences. The primary focus is on physics from the mid/late-nineteenth century to the present, the period of emergence of the kind of theoretical physics that has come to dominate the exact sciences in the twentieth century. The journal is internationally oriented with contributions from a wide range of perspectives. In addition to purely historical or philosophical papers, the editors particularly encourage papers that combine these two disciplines.
The editors are also keen to publish papers of interest to physicists, as well as specialists in history and philosophy of physics.