{"title":"评估可再生能源储能电池:基于目标权重和不确定性保留COPRAS的混合MCDM框架","authors":"Yongxin Guan, Zhongfang Liu, Yunxi Du, Di Xu","doi":"10.1063/5.0153007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Battery technologies offer promising solutions for renewable energy storage. However, selecting the most suitable battery requires proper investigation. This study introduces a multi-criteria decision-making framework for assessing batteries based on various criteria and uncertain data, by using a combined objective weighting method and an uncertainty-preserved complex proportional assessment (UP-COPRAS). The proposed weighting method ensures objectivity and fairness in the weighting result by integrating interval entropy and a gray relational coefficient-supported decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory to capture variation and correlation degrees among the criteria. After incorporating interval numbers with a compensatory ranking method, the UP-COPRAS prioritizes batteries in a simple yet rigorous way using uncertain evaluation data. To test the feasibility of the framework, an illustrative case was employed to assess four battery alternatives using a five-dimensional criteria system. Through results comparison, two mathematical contributions are confirmed. First, the combined objective weighting method uses the variation and correlation features of numerical data to determine criteria weights, which prevents subjective manipulation and eliminates bias in statistical analysis. Second, the UP-COPRAS preserves uncertainties throughout the evaluation, resulting in a rational decision output by eliminating interference in the original data.","PeriodicalId":16953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating batteries for renewable energy storage: A hybrid MCDM framework based on combined objective weights and uncertainty-preserved COPRAS\",\"authors\":\"Yongxin Guan, Zhongfang Liu, Yunxi Du, Di Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0153007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Battery technologies offer promising solutions for renewable energy storage. However, selecting the most suitable battery requires proper investigation. This study introduces a multi-criteria decision-making framework for assessing batteries based on various criteria and uncertain data, by using a combined objective weighting method and an uncertainty-preserved complex proportional assessment (UP-COPRAS). The proposed weighting method ensures objectivity and fairness in the weighting result by integrating interval entropy and a gray relational coefficient-supported decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory to capture variation and correlation degrees among the criteria. After incorporating interval numbers with a compensatory ranking method, the UP-COPRAS prioritizes batteries in a simple yet rigorous way using uncertain evaluation data. To test the feasibility of the framework, an illustrative case was employed to assess four battery alternatives using a five-dimensional criteria system. Through results comparison, two mathematical contributions are confirmed. First, the combined objective weighting method uses the variation and correlation features of numerical data to determine criteria weights, which prevents subjective manipulation and eliminates bias in statistical analysis. Second, the UP-COPRAS preserves uncertainties throughout the evaluation, resulting in a rational decision output by eliminating interference in the original data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0153007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0153007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating batteries for renewable energy storage: A hybrid MCDM framework based on combined objective weights and uncertainty-preserved COPRAS
Battery technologies offer promising solutions for renewable energy storage. However, selecting the most suitable battery requires proper investigation. This study introduces a multi-criteria decision-making framework for assessing batteries based on various criteria and uncertain data, by using a combined objective weighting method and an uncertainty-preserved complex proportional assessment (UP-COPRAS). The proposed weighting method ensures objectivity and fairness in the weighting result by integrating interval entropy and a gray relational coefficient-supported decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory to capture variation and correlation degrees among the criteria. After incorporating interval numbers with a compensatory ranking method, the UP-COPRAS prioritizes batteries in a simple yet rigorous way using uncertain evaluation data. To test the feasibility of the framework, an illustrative case was employed to assess four battery alternatives using a five-dimensional criteria system. Through results comparison, two mathematical contributions are confirmed. First, the combined objective weighting method uses the variation and correlation features of numerical data to determine criteria weights, which prevents subjective manipulation and eliminates bias in statistical analysis. Second, the UP-COPRAS preserves uncertainties throughout the evaluation, resulting in a rational decision output by eliminating interference in the original data.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy (JRSE) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal covering all areas of renewable and sustainable energy relevant to the physical science and engineering communities. The interdisciplinary approach of the publication ensures that the editors draw from researchers worldwide in a diverse range of fields.
Topics covered include:
Renewable energy economics and policy
Renewable energy resource assessment
Solar energy: photovoltaics, solar thermal energy, solar energy for fuels
Wind energy: wind farms, rotors and blades, on- and offshore wind conditions, aerodynamics, fluid dynamics
Bioenergy: biofuels, biomass conversion, artificial photosynthesis
Distributed energy generation: rooftop PV, distributed fuel cells, distributed wind, micro-hydrogen power generation
Power distribution & systems modeling: power electronics and controls, smart grid
Energy efficient buildings: smart windows, PV, wind, power management
Energy conversion: flexoelectric, piezoelectric, thermoelectric, other technologies
Energy storage: batteries, supercapacitors, hydrogen storage, other fuels
Fuel cells: proton exchange membrane cells, solid oxide cells, hybrid fuel cells, other
Marine and hydroelectric energy: dams, tides, waves, other
Transportation: alternative vehicle technologies, plug-in technologies, other
Geothermal energy