条件源项估计与半经验模型相结合的两湍流火焰烟尘预测研究

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
Seyed Mehdi Ashrafizadeh, C. Devaud
{"title":"条件源项估计与半经验模型相结合的两湍流火焰烟尘预测研究","authors":"Seyed Mehdi Ashrafizadeh, C. Devaud","doi":"10.1080/13647830.2022.2072237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modelling of soot formation is investigated for two turbulent flames, at atmospheric and 3 atm pressure conditions. For the first time, a semi-empirical soot formulation that accounts for soot inception, coagulation, surface growth, and oxidation processes is coupled with the turbulent combustion model, Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations. Detailed chemistry is included and an optically thin radiation model is considered. Non-adiabatic chemistry tabulations are created. Good agreement with the experiments is found for turbulent mixing and temperature fields in both flames, with some discrepancies believed to be due to the turbulence modelling approach. At 1 atm, the soot volume fractions are in reasonable agreement with the experiments, but typically smaller than the measurements with the centerline peak locating closer to the fuel exit. At 3 atm, good agreement between the numerical predictions and experimental data is achieved for the soot volume fraction within the experimental error. The centerline peak location is observed slightly farther downstream. Possible sources of discrepancies are examined and comparison with previously published numerical results is also undertaken. Differential diffusion and modified soot chemistry constants may bring further improvement. Without any particular tuning of soot chemistry, soot modelling within CSE is shown to be a promising approach.","PeriodicalId":50665,"journal":{"name":"Combustion Theory and Modelling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of conditional source-term estimation coupled with a semi-empirical model for soot predictions in two turbulent flames\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Mehdi Ashrafizadeh, C. Devaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13647830.2022.2072237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modelling of soot formation is investigated for two turbulent flames, at atmospheric and 3 atm pressure conditions. For the first time, a semi-empirical soot formulation that accounts for soot inception, coagulation, surface growth, and oxidation processes is coupled with the turbulent combustion model, Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations. Detailed chemistry is included and an optically thin radiation model is considered. Non-adiabatic chemistry tabulations are created. Good agreement with the experiments is found for turbulent mixing and temperature fields in both flames, with some discrepancies believed to be due to the turbulence modelling approach. At 1 atm, the soot volume fractions are in reasonable agreement with the experiments, but typically smaller than the measurements with the centerline peak locating closer to the fuel exit. At 3 atm, good agreement between the numerical predictions and experimental data is achieved for the soot volume fraction within the experimental error. The centerline peak location is observed slightly farther downstream. Possible sources of discrepancies are examined and comparison with previously published numerical results is also undertaken. Differential diffusion and modified soot chemistry constants may bring further improvement. Without any particular tuning of soot chemistry, soot modelling within CSE is shown to be a promising approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Combustion Theory and Modelling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Combustion Theory and Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2022.2072237\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combustion Theory and Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2022.2072237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

研究了两种湍流火焰在大气和3atm压力条件下烟灰形成的模型。这是第一次,一个半经验烟尘公式,考虑烟尘的开始,凝固,表面生长和氧化过程与湍流燃烧模型相结合,使用雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程的条件源项估计(CSE)。包括详细的化学,并考虑了光学薄辐射模型。创建了非绝热化学表。两种火焰的湍流混合和温度场与实验结果吻合良好,有些差异被认为是由于湍流模拟方法造成的。在1atm时,烟灰体积分数与实验值基本一致,但通常小于测量值,中心线峰值位于燃料出口附近。在3atm时,烟尘体积分数在实验误差范围内的数值预测与实验数据吻合较好。中心线峰的位置在稍远的下游。研究了差异的可能来源,并与以前发表的数值结果进行了比较。微分扩散和改进烟尘化学常数可能会带来进一步改善。没有任何特别的调整烟灰化学,烟灰建模在CSE被证明是一个有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of conditional source-term estimation coupled with a semi-empirical model for soot predictions in two turbulent flames
The modelling of soot formation is investigated for two turbulent flames, at atmospheric and 3 atm pressure conditions. For the first time, a semi-empirical soot formulation that accounts for soot inception, coagulation, surface growth, and oxidation processes is coupled with the turbulent combustion model, Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations. Detailed chemistry is included and an optically thin radiation model is considered. Non-adiabatic chemistry tabulations are created. Good agreement with the experiments is found for turbulent mixing and temperature fields in both flames, with some discrepancies believed to be due to the turbulence modelling approach. At 1 atm, the soot volume fractions are in reasonable agreement with the experiments, but typically smaller than the measurements with the centerline peak locating closer to the fuel exit. At 3 atm, good agreement between the numerical predictions and experimental data is achieved for the soot volume fraction within the experimental error. The centerline peak location is observed slightly farther downstream. Possible sources of discrepancies are examined and comparison with previously published numerical results is also undertaken. Differential diffusion and modified soot chemistry constants may bring further improvement. Without any particular tuning of soot chemistry, soot modelling within CSE is shown to be a promising approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Combustion Theory and Modelling
Combustion Theory and Modelling 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Combustion Theory and Modelling is a leading international journal devoted to the application of mathematical modelling, numerical simulation and experimental techniques to the study of combustion. Articles can cover a wide range of topics, such as: premixed laminar flames, laminar diffusion flames, turbulent combustion, fires, chemical kinetics, pollutant formation, microgravity, materials synthesis, chemical vapour deposition, catalysis, droplet and spray combustion, detonation dynamics, thermal explosions, ignition, energetic materials and propellants, burners and engine combustion. A diverse spectrum of mathematical methods may also be used, including large scale numerical simulation, hybrid computational schemes, front tracking, adaptive mesh refinement, optimized parallel computation, asymptotic methods and singular perturbation techniques, bifurcation theory, optimization methods, dynamical systems theory, cellular automata and discrete methods and probabilistic and statistical methods. Experimental studies that employ intrusive or nonintrusive diagnostics and are published in the Journal should be closely related to theoretical issues, by highlighting fundamental theoretical questions or by providing a sound basis for comparison with theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信