{"title":"条件源项估计与半经验模型相结合的两湍流火焰烟尘预测研究","authors":"Seyed Mehdi Ashrafizadeh, C. Devaud","doi":"10.1080/13647830.2022.2072237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modelling of soot formation is investigated for two turbulent flames, at atmospheric and 3 atm pressure conditions. For the first time, a semi-empirical soot formulation that accounts for soot inception, coagulation, surface growth, and oxidation processes is coupled with the turbulent combustion model, Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations. Detailed chemistry is included and an optically thin radiation model is considered. Non-adiabatic chemistry tabulations are created. Good agreement with the experiments is found for turbulent mixing and temperature fields in both flames, with some discrepancies believed to be due to the turbulence modelling approach. At 1 atm, the soot volume fractions are in reasonable agreement with the experiments, but typically smaller than the measurements with the centerline peak locating closer to the fuel exit. At 3 atm, good agreement between the numerical predictions and experimental data is achieved for the soot volume fraction within the experimental error. The centerline peak location is observed slightly farther downstream. Possible sources of discrepancies are examined and comparison with previously published numerical results is also undertaken. Differential diffusion and modified soot chemistry constants may bring further improvement. Without any particular tuning of soot chemistry, soot modelling within CSE is shown to be a promising approach.","PeriodicalId":50665,"journal":{"name":"Combustion Theory and Modelling","volume":"26 1","pages":"856 - 878"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of conditional source-term estimation coupled with a semi-empirical model for soot predictions in two turbulent flames\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Mehdi Ashrafizadeh, C. Devaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13647830.2022.2072237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modelling of soot formation is investigated for two turbulent flames, at atmospheric and 3 atm pressure conditions. For the first time, a semi-empirical soot formulation that accounts for soot inception, coagulation, surface growth, and oxidation processes is coupled with the turbulent combustion model, Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations. Detailed chemistry is included and an optically thin radiation model is considered. Non-adiabatic chemistry tabulations are created. Good agreement with the experiments is found for turbulent mixing and temperature fields in both flames, with some discrepancies believed to be due to the turbulence modelling approach. At 1 atm, the soot volume fractions are in reasonable agreement with the experiments, but typically smaller than the measurements with the centerline peak locating closer to the fuel exit. At 3 atm, good agreement between the numerical predictions and experimental data is achieved for the soot volume fraction within the experimental error. The centerline peak location is observed slightly farther downstream. Possible sources of discrepancies are examined and comparison with previously published numerical results is also undertaken. Differential diffusion and modified soot chemistry constants may bring further improvement. Without any particular tuning of soot chemistry, soot modelling within CSE is shown to be a promising approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Combustion Theory and Modelling\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"856 - 878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Combustion Theory and Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2022.2072237\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combustion Theory and Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2022.2072237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigation of conditional source-term estimation coupled with a semi-empirical model for soot predictions in two turbulent flames
The modelling of soot formation is investigated for two turbulent flames, at atmospheric and 3 atm pressure conditions. For the first time, a semi-empirical soot formulation that accounts for soot inception, coagulation, surface growth, and oxidation processes is coupled with the turbulent combustion model, Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations. Detailed chemistry is included and an optically thin radiation model is considered. Non-adiabatic chemistry tabulations are created. Good agreement with the experiments is found for turbulent mixing and temperature fields in both flames, with some discrepancies believed to be due to the turbulence modelling approach. At 1 atm, the soot volume fractions are in reasonable agreement with the experiments, but typically smaller than the measurements with the centerline peak locating closer to the fuel exit. At 3 atm, good agreement between the numerical predictions and experimental data is achieved for the soot volume fraction within the experimental error. The centerline peak location is observed slightly farther downstream. Possible sources of discrepancies are examined and comparison with previously published numerical results is also undertaken. Differential diffusion and modified soot chemistry constants may bring further improvement. Without any particular tuning of soot chemistry, soot modelling within CSE is shown to be a promising approach.
期刊介绍:
Combustion Theory and Modelling is a leading international journal devoted to the application of mathematical modelling, numerical simulation and experimental techniques to the study of combustion. Articles can cover a wide range of topics, such as: premixed laminar flames, laminar diffusion flames, turbulent combustion, fires, chemical kinetics, pollutant formation, microgravity, materials synthesis, chemical vapour deposition, catalysis, droplet and spray combustion, detonation dynamics, thermal explosions, ignition, energetic materials and propellants, burners and engine combustion. A diverse spectrum of mathematical methods may also be used, including large scale numerical simulation, hybrid computational schemes, front tracking, adaptive mesh refinement, optimized parallel computation, asymptotic methods and singular perturbation techniques, bifurcation theory, optimization methods, dynamical systems theory, cellular automata and discrete methods and probabilistic and statistical methods. Experimental studies that employ intrusive or nonintrusive diagnostics and are published in the Journal should be closely related to theoretical issues, by highlighting fundamental theoretical questions or by providing a sound basis for comparison with theory.