{"title":"真实性量表作为心理治疗的结果测量:一项心理测量评估","authors":"Daniel Moerken, M. Cooper","doi":"10.1177/00221678231159152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to evaluate how the Authenticity Scale, a measure of authenticity based on humanistic psychology, functioned as an outcome measure for psychological therapies. Ninety participating clients completed the Authenticity Scale at set intervals throughout their therapy. We considered the measure’s reliability, construct validity, acceptability, and sensitivity to therapeutic intervention. The Authenticity Scale and each of its subscales (Authentic Living, Accepting External Influences, and Self-Alienation) were found to have excellent internal reliability and very high completion rates. The full scale was also found to be sensitive to psychotherapeutic intervention, along with two of its three subscales. However, subscale intercorrelations revealed issues with the factor structure of the measure, with one subscale not correlating with the other two, drawing into question whether the Authenticity Scale should be seen to operationalize a single, multi-faceted construct as intended. Our study provides preliminary evidence that the Authenticity Scale can be used as an outcome measure in clinical practice, though caution and further psychometric testing are strongly recommended.","PeriodicalId":47290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanistic Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Authenticity Scale as an Outcome Measure for Psychotherapy: A Psychometric Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Moerken, M. Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00221678231159152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We aimed to evaluate how the Authenticity Scale, a measure of authenticity based on humanistic psychology, functioned as an outcome measure for psychological therapies. Ninety participating clients completed the Authenticity Scale at set intervals throughout their therapy. We considered the measure’s reliability, construct validity, acceptability, and sensitivity to therapeutic intervention. The Authenticity Scale and each of its subscales (Authentic Living, Accepting External Influences, and Self-Alienation) were found to have excellent internal reliability and very high completion rates. The full scale was also found to be sensitive to psychotherapeutic intervention, along with two of its three subscales. However, subscale intercorrelations revealed issues with the factor structure of the measure, with one subscale not correlating with the other two, drawing into question whether the Authenticity Scale should be seen to operationalize a single, multi-faceted construct as intended. Our study provides preliminary evidence that the Authenticity Scale can be used as an outcome measure in clinical practice, though caution and further psychometric testing are strongly recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Humanistic Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Humanistic Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678231159152\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanistic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678231159152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Authenticity Scale as an Outcome Measure for Psychotherapy: A Psychometric Evaluation
We aimed to evaluate how the Authenticity Scale, a measure of authenticity based on humanistic psychology, functioned as an outcome measure for psychological therapies. Ninety participating clients completed the Authenticity Scale at set intervals throughout their therapy. We considered the measure’s reliability, construct validity, acceptability, and sensitivity to therapeutic intervention. The Authenticity Scale and each of its subscales (Authentic Living, Accepting External Influences, and Self-Alienation) were found to have excellent internal reliability and very high completion rates. The full scale was also found to be sensitive to psychotherapeutic intervention, along with two of its three subscales. However, subscale intercorrelations revealed issues with the factor structure of the measure, with one subscale not correlating with the other two, drawing into question whether the Authenticity Scale should be seen to operationalize a single, multi-faceted construct as intended. Our study provides preliminary evidence that the Authenticity Scale can be used as an outcome measure in clinical practice, though caution and further psychometric testing are strongly recommended.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Humanistic Psychology is an interdisciplinary forum for contributions, controversies and diverse statements pertaining to humanistic psychology. It addresses personal growth, interpersonal encounters, social problems and philosophical issues. An international journal of human potential, self-actualization, the search for meaning and social change, the Journal of Humanistic Psychology was founded by Abraham Maslow and Anthony Sutich in 1961. It is the official journal of the Association for Humanistic Psychology.