理解中国高等教育扩张的后果:双重待遇的视角

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Maocan Guo
{"title":"理解中国高等教育扩张的后果:双重待遇的视角","authors":"Maocan Guo","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2021.1873124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article adopts a double-treatment perspective to understand the consequences of higher educational expansion in China. Since the expansion has changed the school population and enabled only a certain group of individuals to enter college, simply doing a before-and-after comparison of the labor market returns to college would be problematic. To overcome such methodological challenges, this article uses a ranking-and-sorting method to determine individuals truly affected by the expansion policy, or the “compliers” in the local average treatment effect framework, and proposes a difference-in-differences approach to identify the policy effect on the labor market returns to college education. Drawing data from the 1996 Life History and Social Change survey and the 2005–2015 waves of the Chinese General Social Survey, the article describes the characteristics of the “compliers” along the process of China’s higher educational expansion. It shows that the 1999 expansion policy has mainly favored females, urban children, singletons, and those with advantaged class backgrounds during the college transition process.","PeriodicalId":51780,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Sociological Review","volume":"53 1","pages":"333 - 358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21620555.2021.1873124","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the consequence of higher educational expansion in China: a double-treatment perspective\",\"authors\":\"Maocan Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21620555.2021.1873124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article adopts a double-treatment perspective to understand the consequences of higher educational expansion in China. Since the expansion has changed the school population and enabled only a certain group of individuals to enter college, simply doing a before-and-after comparison of the labor market returns to college would be problematic. To overcome such methodological challenges, this article uses a ranking-and-sorting method to determine individuals truly affected by the expansion policy, or the “compliers” in the local average treatment effect framework, and proposes a difference-in-differences approach to identify the policy effect on the labor market returns to college education. Drawing data from the 1996 Life History and Social Change survey and the 2005–2015 waves of the Chinese General Social Survey, the article describes the characteristics of the “compliers” along the process of China’s higher educational expansion. It shows that the 1999 expansion policy has mainly favored females, urban children, singletons, and those with advantaged class backgrounds during the college transition process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Sociological Review\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"333 - 358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21620555.2021.1873124\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Sociological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2021.1873124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2021.1873124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文采用双重处理的视角来理解中国高等教育扩张的后果。由于扩招改变了学校人口,使得只有一部分人能够进入大学,所以简单地比较劳动力市场对大学的回报是有问题的。为了克服这些方法论上的挑战,本文采用排序法来确定真正受扩招政策影响的个体,即当地平均待遇效应框架中的“举报者”,并提出了一种差异中差异的方法来确定政策对劳动力市场回报的影响。本文从1996年的生活史与社会变迁调查和2005-2015年中国综合社会调查的数据中,描述了中国高等教育扩张过程中“编纂者”的特征。研究表明,1999年的扩招政策主要有利于女性、城市儿童、独生子女和在大学转学过程中具有优势阶级背景的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the consequence of higher educational expansion in China: a double-treatment perspective
Abstract This article adopts a double-treatment perspective to understand the consequences of higher educational expansion in China. Since the expansion has changed the school population and enabled only a certain group of individuals to enter college, simply doing a before-and-after comparison of the labor market returns to college would be problematic. To overcome such methodological challenges, this article uses a ranking-and-sorting method to determine individuals truly affected by the expansion policy, or the “compliers” in the local average treatment effect framework, and proposes a difference-in-differences approach to identify the policy effect on the labor market returns to college education. Drawing data from the 1996 Life History and Social Change survey and the 2005–2015 waves of the Chinese General Social Survey, the article describes the characteristics of the “compliers” along the process of China’s higher educational expansion. It shows that the 1999 expansion policy has mainly favored females, urban children, singletons, and those with advantaged class backgrounds during the college transition process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信