按韩国就业状况看违约概率

IF 5.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
B. Nidhiprabha, Thammasat
{"title":"按韩国就业状况看违约概率","authors":"B. Nidhiprabha, Thammasat","doi":"10.1162/asep_a_00787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper’s main objective is to examine the default rate in different groups of workers in South Korea. The maintained hypothesis is that the loan default rate is higher for the self-employed than the non-self-employed. The default rate is related to borrowers’ characteristics, loan types (unsecured, non-mortgage secured, and mortgages), and risk premiums. The authors define the risk premium as the interest spread between the interest charged by the purpose of borrowing, or by risk assessment (from credit rating agency), and the cost of fund index. Defaults are defined as loans overdue for more than three months. Bank of Korea provides Korea Consumer Credit Panel data from 2011:Q1 to 2017:Q2. The average debt of self-employed borrowers is three times larger than of the non-self-employed. The authors use a dynamic probit model with correlated random effects to avoid excessive standard errors and a biased estimator due to heterogeneity of observations over time. In their model esti-mation, there are 8.9 million observations: 7.9 million non-self-employed, and 923,985 self-employed. It is possible that the authors may obtain the empirical results that are highly overwhelmed by the enormous size of salary workers, which is more than eight times the number of self-employed workers. Loan size varying smallest largest loan size. The amount of loans should have been utilized directly without into the index. The actual loan size would provide more variations of the explanatory variable, rather than using a crude scale 1–10","PeriodicalId":52020,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic Papers","volume":"19 1","pages":"85-88"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments on Default Probability by Employment Status in South Korea\",\"authors\":\"B. Nidhiprabha, Thammasat\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/asep_a_00787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper’s main objective is to examine the default rate in different groups of workers in South Korea. The maintained hypothesis is that the loan default rate is higher for the self-employed than the non-self-employed. The default rate is related to borrowers’ characteristics, loan types (unsecured, non-mortgage secured, and mortgages), and risk premiums. The authors define the risk premium as the interest spread between the interest charged by the purpose of borrowing, or by risk assessment (from credit rating agency), and the cost of fund index. Defaults are defined as loans overdue for more than three months. Bank of Korea provides Korea Consumer Credit Panel data from 2011:Q1 to 2017:Q2. The average debt of self-employed borrowers is three times larger than of the non-self-employed. The authors use a dynamic probit model with correlated random effects to avoid excessive standard errors and a biased estimator due to heterogeneity of observations over time. In their model esti-mation, there are 8.9 million observations: 7.9 million non-self-employed, and 923,985 self-employed. It is possible that the authors may obtain the empirical results that are highly overwhelmed by the enormous size of salary workers, which is more than eight times the number of self-employed workers. Loan size varying smallest largest loan size. The amount of loans should have been utilized directly without into the index. The actual loan size would provide more variations of the explanatory variable, rather than using a crude scale 1–10\",\"PeriodicalId\":52020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Economic Papers\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"85-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00787\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主要目的是研究韩国不同工人群体的违约率。维持的假设是,自营职业者的贷款违约率高于非自营职业者。违约率与借款人的特征、贷款类型(无担保、无抵押担保和抵押贷款)和风险溢价有关。作者将风险溢价定义为借款目的或风险评估(来自信用评级机构)收取的利息与资金成本指数之间的利差。违约被定义为逾期超过三个月的贷款。韩国银行提供了韩国消费者信贷委员会2011年第一季度至2017年第二季度的数据。自营职业借款人的平均债务是非自营职业者的三倍。作者使用了一个具有相关随机效应的动态probit模型,以避免过度的标准误差和由于观测随时间的异质性而产生的偏差估计。在他们的模型估计中,有890万个观察对象:790万个非个体经营者,923985个个体经营者。作者可能会获得的实证结果被庞大的工薪阶层所淹没,而工薪阶层的人数是自营职业者人数的八倍多。贷款规模变化最小最大贷款规模。贷款金额本应在不计入指数的情况下直接使用。实际贷款规模将提供更多解释变量的变化,而不是使用粗略的1-10
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comments on Default Probability by Employment Status in South Korea
The paper’s main objective is to examine the default rate in different groups of workers in South Korea. The maintained hypothesis is that the loan default rate is higher for the self-employed than the non-self-employed. The default rate is related to borrowers’ characteristics, loan types (unsecured, non-mortgage secured, and mortgages), and risk premiums. The authors define the risk premium as the interest spread between the interest charged by the purpose of borrowing, or by risk assessment (from credit rating agency), and the cost of fund index. Defaults are defined as loans overdue for more than three months. Bank of Korea provides Korea Consumer Credit Panel data from 2011:Q1 to 2017:Q2. The average debt of self-employed borrowers is three times larger than of the non-self-employed. The authors use a dynamic probit model with correlated random effects to avoid excessive standard errors and a biased estimator due to heterogeneity of observations over time. In their model esti-mation, there are 8.9 million observations: 7.9 million non-self-employed, and 923,985 self-employed. It is possible that the authors may obtain the empirical results that are highly overwhelmed by the enormous size of salary workers, which is more than eight times the number of self-employed workers. Loan size varying smallest largest loan size. The amount of loans should have been utilized directly without into the index. The actual loan size would provide more variations of the explanatory variable, rather than using a crude scale 1–10
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The journal Asian Economic Papers (AEP) is supported by several prominent institutions, including the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University in the United States. This shows that there is a strong emphasis on sustainable development within the journal's scope. Additionally, the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy in South Korea, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) in Malaysia, and the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia in Indonesia also sponsor AEP. The articles published in AEP focus on conducting thorough and rigorous analyses of significant economic issues pertaining to specific Asian economies or the broader Asian region. The aim is to gain a deeper understanding of these issues and provide innovative solutions. By offering creative solutions to economic challenges, AEP contributes to the discourse and policymaking that impact the Asian economies and region as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信