布拉迪斯拉发市城市生态系统中常规有轨电车轨道与管理绿色有轨电车轨道野生植物区系组成差异的比较

IF 0.6 Q4 ECOLOGY
Hacquetia Pub Date : 2022-02-12 DOI:10.2478/hacq-2021-0020
Alena Rendeková, K. Mičieta, M. Hrabovský, Eva Zahradníková, Martina Michalová, Ján Miškovic, M. Eliášová, Dominika Ballová
{"title":"布拉迪斯拉发市城市生态系统中常规有轨电车轨道与管理绿色有轨电车轨道野生植物区系组成差异的比较","authors":"Alena Rendeková, K. Mičieta, M. Hrabovský, Eva Zahradníková, Martina Michalová, Ján Miškovic, M. Eliášová, Dominika Ballová","doi":"10.2478/hacq-2021-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Green infrastructure (GI) brings many benefits to urban ecosystems. Green tram tracks can be considered to be a part of GI. The presented study is focused on the comparison of the species’ frequency and composition between conventional tram tracks and green tram tracks in Bratislava, Slovakia, Central Europe. This comparison also provides an insight into the changes of the flora of tram tracks over time, as we compare the results of the older research with recent research on green tram tracks. The results revealed significant differences in the composition of flora between conventional tram tracks and green tram tracks. In particular, the total number of species has decreased over time, as green tram tracks host fewer spontaneously growing taxa than conventional ones. The frequency of occurrence of archaeophytes and neophytes has decreased on the strict rail yard while on the tracksides it has increased. Green tram tracks deliver positive features to ecosystems, but may also have negative aspects because they present a pool of alien, potentially invasive plants.","PeriodicalId":39239,"journal":{"name":"Hacquetia","volume":"21 1","pages":"73 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the differences in the composition of ruderal flora between conventional tram tracks and managed green tram tracks in the urban ecosystem of the city of Bratislava\",\"authors\":\"Alena Rendeková, K. Mičieta, M. Hrabovský, Eva Zahradníková, Martina Michalová, Ján Miškovic, M. Eliášová, Dominika Ballová\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/hacq-2021-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Green infrastructure (GI) brings many benefits to urban ecosystems. Green tram tracks can be considered to be a part of GI. The presented study is focused on the comparison of the species’ frequency and composition between conventional tram tracks and green tram tracks in Bratislava, Slovakia, Central Europe. This comparison also provides an insight into the changes of the flora of tram tracks over time, as we compare the results of the older research with recent research on green tram tracks. The results revealed significant differences in the composition of flora between conventional tram tracks and green tram tracks. In particular, the total number of species has decreased over time, as green tram tracks host fewer spontaneously growing taxa than conventional ones. The frequency of occurrence of archaeophytes and neophytes has decreased on the strict rail yard while on the tracksides it has increased. Green tram tracks deliver positive features to ecosystems, but may also have negative aspects because they present a pool of alien, potentially invasive plants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hacquetia\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hacquetia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/hacq-2021-0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hacquetia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/hacq-2021-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色基础设施为城市生态系统带来诸多益处。绿色电车轨道可被视为地理标志的一部分。本研究的重点是比较布拉迪斯拉发,斯洛伐克,中欧的传统电车轨道和绿色电车轨道的物种频率和组成。当我们将旧的研究结果与最近对绿色电车轨道的研究结果进行比较时,这种比较也提供了对电车轨道植物群随时间变化的洞察。结果表明,普通有轨电车轨道与绿化有轨电车轨道的植物区系组成存在显著差异。特别是,随着时间的推移,物种的总数减少了,因为绿色有轨电车轨道上的自发生长的分类群比传统轨道上的要少。古生植物和新生植物的出现频率在严格的铁路站场上有所减少,而在轨道两侧有所增加。绿色电车轨道为生态系统带来了积极的特征,但也可能有消极的方面,因为它们提供了一个外来的、潜在的入侵植物池。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the differences in the composition of ruderal flora between conventional tram tracks and managed green tram tracks in the urban ecosystem of the city of Bratislava
Abstract Green infrastructure (GI) brings many benefits to urban ecosystems. Green tram tracks can be considered to be a part of GI. The presented study is focused on the comparison of the species’ frequency and composition between conventional tram tracks and green tram tracks in Bratislava, Slovakia, Central Europe. This comparison also provides an insight into the changes of the flora of tram tracks over time, as we compare the results of the older research with recent research on green tram tracks. The results revealed significant differences in the composition of flora between conventional tram tracks and green tram tracks. In particular, the total number of species has decreased over time, as green tram tracks host fewer spontaneously growing taxa than conventional ones. The frequency of occurrence of archaeophytes and neophytes has decreased on the strict rail yard while on the tracksides it has increased. Green tram tracks deliver positive features to ecosystems, but may also have negative aspects because they present a pool of alien, potentially invasive plants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hacquetia
Hacquetia Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信