新柏拉图主义神学与上帝的相关性

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Nick Zangwill
{"title":"新柏拉图主义神学与上帝的相关性","authors":"Nick Zangwill","doi":"10.24204/ejpr.2022.3764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. I raise the issue over why human beings should be concerned with God even if He created the world and even if He is responsible for Morality. I describe God’s apparent irrelevance to human beings. In response, I consider and reject a Neo-Aristotelian solution. Instead I propose a Neoplatonist approach, which is cautiously endorsed. The nature of participation is briefly discussed. As an illustration, I consider free will from a Neoplatonist point of view. Jewish and Christian approaches to perfection are then contrasted. I conclude with the advantages of Neoplatonism over Neo-Aristotelianism.","PeriodicalId":43251,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoplatonist Theology And God’s Relevance\",\"authors\":\"Nick Zangwill\",\"doi\":\"10.24204/ejpr.2022.3764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. I raise the issue over why human beings should be concerned with God even if He created the world and even if He is responsible for Morality. I describe God’s apparent irrelevance to human beings. In response, I consider and reject a Neo-Aristotelian solution. Instead I propose a Neoplatonist approach, which is cautiously endorsed. The nature of participation is briefly discussed. As an illustration, I consider free will from a Neoplatonist point of view. Jewish and Christian approaches to perfection are then contrasted. I conclude with the advantages of Neoplatonism over Neo-Aristotelianism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal for Philosophy of Religion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal for Philosophy of Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3764\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal for Philosophy of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要我提出了一个问题,为什么人类应该关心上帝,即使他创造了世界,即使他对道德负责。我描述了上帝显然与人类无关。作为回应,我考虑并拒绝了新亚里士多德的解决方案。相反,我提出了一种新柏拉图主义的方法,这种方法得到了谨慎的认可。简要讨论了参与的性质。作为例证,我从新柏拉图主义的角度考虑自由意志。犹太人和基督徒追求完美的方法进行了对比。最后,我总结了新柏拉图主义相对于新亚里士多德主义的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neoplatonist Theology And God’s Relevance
Abstract. I raise the issue over why human beings should be concerned with God even if He created the world and even if He is responsible for Morality. I describe God’s apparent irrelevance to human beings. In response, I consider and reject a Neo-Aristotelian solution. Instead I propose a Neoplatonist approach, which is cautiously endorsed. The nature of participation is briefly discussed. As an illustration, I consider free will from a Neoplatonist point of view. Jewish and Christian approaches to perfection are then contrasted. I conclude with the advantages of Neoplatonism over Neo-Aristotelianism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion (EJPR) is a peer-reviewed international journal devoted to the problems of the philosophy of religion. EJPR has been founded with the aim of fostering the development of philosophy of religion in Europe and elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信