低收入和中等收入国家预防和控制非传染性疾病的护士主导干预措施:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kavita Kavita, J. Thakur, S. Ghai, T. Narang, Rajbir Kaur
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家预防和控制非传染性疾病的护士主导干预措施:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Kavita Kavita, J. Thakur, S. Ghai, T. Narang, Rajbir Kaur","doi":"10.4103/jncd.jncd_74_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face numerous challenges in the implementation of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) prevention programs due to a shortage of health workforce. Task shifting to nurses is a viable and effective solution to address the healthcare human resource crisis. We, therefore, intend to assess the existing evidence on the effectiveness of interventions by nurses for the management of chronic NCDs in LMICs. Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the trials that utilized nurses for the management of NCDs in LMICs. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinical registries of different LMICs to search for relevant literature. Meta-analysis using an inverse-variance weighted random effect model was used to summarize the findings. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019118430). Results: We found 2097 studies from the literature search, out of which 39 studies with 15,672 participants were eligible for narrative synthesis. Result of the meta-analysis showed that nurse-led interventions were effective in the reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) (average pooled mean difference was −4.32 [95% (confidence interval) CI − 7.07–−1.57]), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (−3.11 mmHg; 95% CI −4.96–−1.26), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (−0.73; 95% CI − 1.08–−0.38), fasting blood sugar (FBS) (−0.8; 95% CI −13.42–−2.58), total cholesterol (TC) (−1.18; 95% CI −20.06–−3.57), and triglycerides (TG) (−12.20; 95% CI − 23.52–−0.87). However, there was no major significant difference in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The overall quality of evidence based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations was moderate for FBS, low for SBP, DBP, HbA1c, HDL, TC, and TG, and very low for LDL. Interpretation: Nurse-led interventions as compared to usual care are effective for the management of diabetes and hypertension and can be effectively used for national NCD programs in LMICs.","PeriodicalId":52935,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse-led interventions for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kavita Kavita, J. Thakur, S. Ghai, T. Narang, Rajbir Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jncd.jncd_74_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face numerous challenges in the implementation of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) prevention programs due to a shortage of health workforce. Task shifting to nurses is a viable and effective solution to address the healthcare human resource crisis. We, therefore, intend to assess the existing evidence on the effectiveness of interventions by nurses for the management of chronic NCDs in LMICs. Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the trials that utilized nurses for the management of NCDs in LMICs. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinical registries of different LMICs to search for relevant literature. Meta-analysis using an inverse-variance weighted random effect model was used to summarize the findings. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019118430). Results: We found 2097 studies from the literature search, out of which 39 studies with 15,672 participants were eligible for narrative synthesis. Result of the meta-analysis showed that nurse-led interventions were effective in the reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) (average pooled mean difference was −4.32 [95% (confidence interval) CI − 7.07–−1.57]), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (−3.11 mmHg; 95% CI −4.96–−1.26), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (−0.73; 95% CI − 1.08–−0.38), fasting blood sugar (FBS) (−0.8; 95% CI −13.42–−2.58), total cholesterol (TC) (−1.18; 95% CI −20.06–−3.57), and triglycerides (TG) (−12.20; 95% CI − 23.52–−0.87). However, there was no major significant difference in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The overall quality of evidence based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations was moderate for FBS, low for SBP, DBP, HbA1c, HDL, TC, and TG, and very low for LDL. Interpretation: Nurse-led interventions as compared to usual care are effective for the management of diabetes and hypertension and can be effectively used for national NCD programs in LMICs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jncd.jncd_74_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jncd.jncd_74_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:由于卫生人力短缺,低收入和中等收入国家在实施非传染性疾病(ncd)预防规划方面面临诸多挑战。任务转移到护士身上是解决医疗人力资源危机的可行和有效的解决方案。因此,我们打算评估中低收入国家护士干预慢性非传染性疾病管理有效性的现有证据。方法:我们对使用护士管理中低收入国家非传染性疾病的试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们检索了PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和不同低收入国家的临床注册库,以寻找相关文献。采用反方差加权随机效应模型进行meta分析,总结研究结果。研究方案已在PROSPERO数据库中注册(CRD42019118430)。结果:我们从文献检索中发现2097项研究,其中39项研究15672名参与者符合叙事综合的条件。meta分析结果显示,护士主导的干预措施在降低收缩压(SBP)(平均合并平均差值为- 4.32[95%(置信区间)CI - 7.07 - - 1.57])、舒张压(- 3.11 mmHg;95% CI为−4.96 -−1.26),糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(−0.73;95% CI为−1.08 -−0.38),空腹血糖(FBS)(−0.8;95% CI为−13.42 ~−2.58),总胆固醇(TC)(−1.18;95% CI−20.06 -−3.57),甘油三酯(TG)(−12.20;95% ci为−23.52 ~−0.87)。低密度脂蛋白(LDL)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)无显著性差异。基于分级推荐评估、发展和评估的证据的总体质量,FBS为中等,收缩压、舒张压、HbA1c、HDL、TC和TG为低,LDL为极低。解释:与常规护理相比,护士主导的干预措施对糖尿病和高血压的管理更有效,并且可以有效地用于中低收入国家的非传染性疾病规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse-led interventions for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face numerous challenges in the implementation of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) prevention programs due to a shortage of health workforce. Task shifting to nurses is a viable and effective solution to address the healthcare human resource crisis. We, therefore, intend to assess the existing evidence on the effectiveness of interventions by nurses for the management of chronic NCDs in LMICs. Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the trials that utilized nurses for the management of NCDs in LMICs. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinical registries of different LMICs to search for relevant literature. Meta-analysis using an inverse-variance weighted random effect model was used to summarize the findings. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019118430). Results: We found 2097 studies from the literature search, out of which 39 studies with 15,672 participants were eligible for narrative synthesis. Result of the meta-analysis showed that nurse-led interventions were effective in the reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) (average pooled mean difference was −4.32 [95% (confidence interval) CI − 7.07–−1.57]), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (−3.11 mmHg; 95% CI −4.96–−1.26), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (−0.73; 95% CI − 1.08–−0.38), fasting blood sugar (FBS) (−0.8; 95% CI −13.42–−2.58), total cholesterol (TC) (−1.18; 95% CI −20.06–−3.57), and triglycerides (TG) (−12.20; 95% CI − 23.52–−0.87). However, there was no major significant difference in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The overall quality of evidence based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations was moderate for FBS, low for SBP, DBP, HbA1c, HDL, TC, and TG, and very low for LDL. Interpretation: Nurse-led interventions as compared to usual care are effective for the management of diabetes and hypertension and can be effectively used for national NCD programs in LMICs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信