不合时宜(d)差异:关于跨国女权主义遭遇的注释

IF 0.9 2区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
Xin Liu
{"title":"不合时宜(d)差异:关于跨国女权主义遭遇的注释","authors":"Xin Liu","doi":"10.1177/01417789211040456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How to foster feminist coalitions across various borders, without flattening out crucial differences that matter? The problem of difference has exercised much critical attention in the field of transnational feminist studies. On the one hand, transnational feminism foregrounds differences and multiplicities, and challenges the exclusion and marginalisation of the other. On the other hand, the investments in certain difference sometimes run the risk of fixing its location and meaning, and producing a seeming impasse for transnational feminist collaboration. As M.J. Alexander and Chandra Talpade Mohanty (2010, p. 27) ask, ‘can transnational feminist lenses push us to ask questions that are location specific but not necessarily location bound?’.","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"inappropriate(d) difference: notes on transnational feminist encounters\",\"authors\":\"Xin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01417789211040456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How to foster feminist coalitions across various borders, without flattening out crucial differences that matter? The problem of difference has exercised much critical attention in the field of transnational feminist studies. On the one hand, transnational feminism foregrounds differences and multiplicities, and challenges the exclusion and marginalisation of the other. On the other hand, the investments in certain difference sometimes run the risk of fixing its location and meaning, and producing a seeming impasse for transnational feminist collaboration. As M.J. Alexander and Chandra Talpade Mohanty (2010, p. 27) ask, ‘can transnational feminist lenses push us to ask questions that are location specific but not necessarily location bound?’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211040456\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211040456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如何在不消除重要分歧的情况下,跨国界建立女权主义联盟?差异问题在跨国女性主义研究领域受到了广泛的关注。一方面,跨国女权主义凸显了差异性和多样性,并挑战了对另一方的排斥和边缘化。另一方面,对某些差异的投资有时会冒着固定其位置和意义的风险,并为跨国女权主义合作造成看似僵局的局面。正如M.J.Alexander和Chandra Talpade Mohanty(2010年,第27页)所问,“跨国女权主义镜头能促使我们提出特定于地点但不一定局限于地点的问题吗?”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
inappropriate(d) difference: notes on transnational feminist encounters
How to foster feminist coalitions across various borders, without flattening out crucial differences that matter? The problem of difference has exercised much critical attention in the field of transnational feminist studies. On the one hand, transnational feminism foregrounds differences and multiplicities, and challenges the exclusion and marginalisation of the other. On the other hand, the investments in certain difference sometimes run the risk of fixing its location and meaning, and producing a seeming impasse for transnational feminist collaboration. As M.J. Alexander and Chandra Talpade Mohanty (2010, p. 27) ask, ‘can transnational feminist lenses push us to ask questions that are location specific but not necessarily location bound?’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Review
Feminist Review WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Feminist Review is a peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal setting new agendas for the analysis of the social world. Currently based in London with an international scope, FR invites critical reflection on the relationship between materiality and representation, theory and practice, subjectivity and communities, contemporary and historical formations. The FR Collective is committed to exploring gender in its multiple forms and interrelationships. As well as academic articles we publish experimental pieces, visual and textual media and political interventions, including, for example, interviews, short stories, poems and photographic essays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信