过去十年葡萄牙企业的无形资本和生产率(2010-2019)

Nuno Gonçalves, C. Carreira
{"title":"过去十年葡萄牙企业的无形资本和生产率(2010-2019)","authors":"Nuno Gonçalves, C. Carreira","doi":"10.14195/2183-203x_56_5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the effects of intangible capital on the productivity of Portuguese firms in the last decade. Intangible assets can increase the productivity of labor and productive factors. Although no consensus has been reached on standard principles and uniform methods for measuring intangible assets, the attempts of various investigators, such as those proposed in this research, pave the way for the development of a framework. To achieve this objective, a Cobb-Douglas production function was estimated at the firm level, where intangible capital is assumed as a productive factor. To perform a sectoral analysis, the model was estimated by activity sector. We also estimated the evolution of the contribution of intangible capital in two distinct periods 2010-14 (recession) and 2015-19 (recovery). The results obtained were to some extent expected, confirming the evidence of the positive effect of intangible assets on productivity. The intangible effect is greater in the sectors of Manufacturing and Construction, and inside the Manufacturing sector, the Textile industry is where the effect is larger. For the Trade and Business Services sector the effect is negative or null. Although intangible capital has a strong influence at the aggregate level, it has gradually lost its relevance. This result is understandable, given the low and decreasing levels of intangible investment and the continuous decrease in intangible capital during the decade.","PeriodicalId":33953,"journal":{"name":"Notas Economicas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capital Intangível e Produtividade das Empresas Portuguesas na Última Década (2010-2019)\",\"authors\":\"Nuno Gonçalves, C. Carreira\",\"doi\":\"10.14195/2183-203x_56_5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the effects of intangible capital on the productivity of Portuguese firms in the last decade. Intangible assets can increase the productivity of labor and productive factors. Although no consensus has been reached on standard principles and uniform methods for measuring intangible assets, the attempts of various investigators, such as those proposed in this research, pave the way for the development of a framework. To achieve this objective, a Cobb-Douglas production function was estimated at the firm level, where intangible capital is assumed as a productive factor. To perform a sectoral analysis, the model was estimated by activity sector. We also estimated the evolution of the contribution of intangible capital in two distinct periods 2010-14 (recession) and 2015-19 (recovery). The results obtained were to some extent expected, confirming the evidence of the positive effect of intangible assets on productivity. The intangible effect is greater in the sectors of Manufacturing and Construction, and inside the Manufacturing sector, the Textile industry is where the effect is larger. For the Trade and Business Services sector the effect is negative or null. Although intangible capital has a strong influence at the aggregate level, it has gradually lost its relevance. This result is understandable, given the low and decreasing levels of intangible investment and the continuous decrease in intangible capital during the decade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Notas Economicas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Notas Economicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-203x_56_5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notas Economicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-203x_56_5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了近十年来无形资本对葡萄牙企业生产率的影响。无形资产可以提高劳动和生产要素的生产率。尽管在衡量无形资产的标准原则和统一方法上尚未达成共识,但各种研究人员的尝试,例如本研究中提出的研究人员,为框架的发展铺平了道路。为了实现这一目标,在企业层面估计了柯布-道格拉斯生产函数,其中无形资本被假设为生产要素。为了进行部门分析,该模型按活动部门进行估计。我们还估算了2010-14年(衰退)和2015-19年(复苏)两个不同时期无形资本贡献的演变。所得结果在一定程度上是预期的,证实了无形资产对生产率有积极影响的证据。制造业和建筑业的无形效应较大,而在制造业内部,纺织业的无形效应较大。对于贸易和商业服务部门来说,这种影响是负面的或无效的。虽然无形资本在总量层面上具有强大的影响力,但它已经逐渐失去了相关性。这一结果是可以理解的,因为在过去的十年里,无形投资的水平很低,而且还在不断下降,无形资本也在不断减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capital Intangível e Produtividade das Empresas Portuguesas na Última Década (2010-2019)
This article analyzes the effects of intangible capital on the productivity of Portuguese firms in the last decade. Intangible assets can increase the productivity of labor and productive factors. Although no consensus has been reached on standard principles and uniform methods for measuring intangible assets, the attempts of various investigators, such as those proposed in this research, pave the way for the development of a framework. To achieve this objective, a Cobb-Douglas production function was estimated at the firm level, where intangible capital is assumed as a productive factor. To perform a sectoral analysis, the model was estimated by activity sector. We also estimated the evolution of the contribution of intangible capital in two distinct periods 2010-14 (recession) and 2015-19 (recovery). The results obtained were to some extent expected, confirming the evidence of the positive effect of intangible assets on productivity. The intangible effect is greater in the sectors of Manufacturing and Construction, and inside the Manufacturing sector, the Textile industry is where the effect is larger. For the Trade and Business Services sector the effect is negative or null. Although intangible capital has a strong influence at the aggregate level, it has gradually lost its relevance. This result is understandable, given the low and decreasing levels of intangible investment and the continuous decrease in intangible capital during the decade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信