{"title":"Why dwóch panów przyszło, but dwaj panowie przyszli and dwie kobiety przyszły? Agreement with Quantified Subjects in Polish versus Russian and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian","authors":"Katrin Schlund","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2021.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In Russian, agreement with quantified subjects varies between plural (= semantic) and singular (= grammatical, default, impersonal) agreement, and there is ample evidence that this variation is governed by semantic and pragmatic factors (such as topicality and animacy of the subject). Although Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian follows stricter normative rules, variation does occur and is motivated similarly to Russian. Polish seems at odds with the paradigm of these languages. First, the grammar of contemporary Polish does not allow for variation in agreement with quantified subjects. Second, semantic agreement is available only with non-virile nouns in paucal numbers, while virile nouns require grammatical agreement (e.g., dwie kobiety przyszłyPL 'two women came' but dwóch mężczyzn przyszłoSG 'two men came'). This paper offers a way to integrate the Polish data into the Russian and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian picture by drawing on historical and contemporary empirical evidence. Specifically, it offers a short analysis of variation between the nominative and oblique masculine forms of paucal numbers (dwaj vs. dwóch).","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2021.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:在俄语中,与量化主语的一致性在复数(=语义)和单数(=语法、默认、非人格)一致性之间存在差异,有充分证据表明这种差异受语义和语用因素(如主语的话题性和动物性)的支配。尽管波斯尼亚语/克罗地亚语/塞尔维亚语遵循更严格的规范性规则,但变化确实会发生,其动机与俄语类似。波兰语似乎与这些语言的范式不一致。首先,当代波兰语的语法不允许在与量化主题一致的情况下发生变化。其次,语义一致性仅适用于数量较少的非男性化名词,而男性化名词需要语法一致性(例如,dwie kobiety przyszłyPL“两个女人来了”,但dwóch mÉżczyzn-pzysz 322; oSG“两个男人来了”)。本文通过借鉴历史和当代的经验证据,提供了一种将波兰数据整合到俄罗斯和波斯尼亚/克罗地亚/塞尔维亚图像中的方法。具体来说,它对贫困数字的主格和斜阳性形式之间的变化进行了简短的分析(dwaj与dwóch)。
Why dwóch panów przyszło, but dwaj panowie przyszli and dwie kobiety przyszły? Agreement with Quantified Subjects in Polish versus Russian and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian
Abstract:In Russian, agreement with quantified subjects varies between plural (= semantic) and singular (= grammatical, default, impersonal) agreement, and there is ample evidence that this variation is governed by semantic and pragmatic factors (such as topicality and animacy of the subject). Although Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian follows stricter normative rules, variation does occur and is motivated similarly to Russian. Polish seems at odds with the paradigm of these languages. First, the grammar of contemporary Polish does not allow for variation in agreement with quantified subjects. Second, semantic agreement is available only with non-virile nouns in paucal numbers, while virile nouns require grammatical agreement (e.g., dwie kobiety przyszłyPL 'two women came' but dwóch mężczyzn przyszłoSG 'two men came'). This paper offers a way to integrate the Polish data into the Russian and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian picture by drawing on historical and contemporary empirical evidence. Specifically, it offers a short analysis of variation between the nominative and oblique masculine forms of paucal numbers (dwaj vs. dwóch).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Slavic Linguistics, or JSL, is the official journal of the Slavic Linguistics Society. JSL publishes research articles and book reviews that address the description and analysis of Slavic languages and that are of general interest to linguists. Published papers deal with any aspect of synchronic or diachronic Slavic linguistics – phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, or pragmatics – which raises substantive problems of broad theoretical concern or proposes significant descriptive generalizations. Comparative studies and formal analyses are also published. Different theoretical orientations are represented in the journal. One volume (two issues) is published per year, ca. 360 pp.