真实+想象=复杂:迈向更好的房地产课程

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q2 Social Sciences
James Grimmelmann
{"title":"真实+想象=复杂:迈向更好的房地产课程","authors":"James Grimmelmann","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/8w3d6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Property” in most law schools means real property: the dense, illogical, and special-purpose body of land law. But this is wrong: property also comes in personal, intangible, and intellectual flavors—all of them more important to modern lawyers than land. Real property is deeply unrepresentative of property law, and focusing our teaching on it sells the subject short. A better property course would fully embrace these other forms of property as real property’s equals. Escaping the traditional but labyrinthine classifications of real property frees teachers to bring out the underlying conceptual coherence and unity of property law. The resulting course is easier to teach, more enjoyable for students, and more relevant to legal practice. There is no excuse not to switch.","PeriodicalId":39591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Education","volume":"66 1","pages":"930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real + Imaginary = Complex: Toward a Better Property Course\",\"authors\":\"James Grimmelmann\",\"doi\":\"10.31228/osf.io/8w3d6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Property” in most law schools means real property: the dense, illogical, and special-purpose body of land law. But this is wrong: property also comes in personal, intangible, and intellectual flavors—all of them more important to modern lawyers than land. Real property is deeply unrepresentative of property law, and focusing our teaching on it sells the subject short. A better property course would fully embrace these other forms of property as real property’s equals. Escaping the traditional but labyrinthine classifications of real property frees teachers to bring out the underlying conceptual coherence and unity of property law. The resulting course is easier to teach, more enjoyable for students, and more relevant to legal practice. There is no excuse not to switch.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/8w3d6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/8w3d6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在大多数法学院中,“财产”是指不动产:土地法的密集、不合逻辑和特殊主体。但这是错误的:财产也有个人的、无形的和智力的味道——所有这些对现代律师来说都比土地更重要。不动产在物权法中具有深刻的不可代表性,而我们对不动产的教学又缺乏对不动产权的认识。一个更好的房地产课程将完全包含这些其他形式的房地产,与不动产平等。摆脱传统但错综复杂的不动产分类,教师可以自由地揭示出财产法潜在的概念连贯性和统一性。由此产生的课程更容易教授,对学生来说更愉快,并且与法律实践更相关。没有理由不换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real + Imaginary = Complex: Toward a Better Property Course
“Property” in most law schools means real property: the dense, illogical, and special-purpose body of land law. But this is wrong: property also comes in personal, intangible, and intellectual flavors—all of them more important to modern lawyers than land. Real property is deeply unrepresentative of property law, and focusing our teaching on it sells the subject short. A better property course would fully embrace these other forms of property as real property’s equals. Escaping the traditional but labyrinthine classifications of real property frees teachers to bring out the underlying conceptual coherence and unity of property law. The resulting course is easier to teach, more enjoyable for students, and more relevant to legal practice. There is no excuse not to switch.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Legal Education
Journal of Legal Education Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信