风险规避型绿色供应链的协调机制

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Yuhong Wang, Xiaoqing Sheng, Y. Xie
{"title":"风险规避型绿色供应链的协调机制","authors":"Yuhong Wang, Xiaoqing Sheng, Y. Xie","doi":"10.1108/cms-10-2021-0454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to establish a centralized decision-making game model and manufacturer-led Stackelberg game model based on factors of risk aversion of supply chain members and product greenness. The research aims to study whether the introduction of the “cost + risk sharing” contract affects coordination of this type of green supply by calculating the optimal decision of each mode.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research designs a supply chain model under centralized and decentralized decision-making. This model uses the Stackelberg game to calculate the optimal decision under decentralized decision-making to evaluate the effect of a green supply chain and then analyze the “cost + risk sharing” contract and the degree of coordination of the supply chain. A sensitivity analysis is conducted on the centralized mode for the impact of variables on the supply chain.\n\n\nFindings\nThis research finds a double marginalization effect in decentralized decision-making, and the risk aversion coefficient plays a decisive role in the utility of supply chain members. The specific range of risk- and cost-sharing factors allows supply chain members to achieve Pareto improvements and provides decision-making based on the corresponding management strategies according to each other’s risk preference degree.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe influence of each variable on the green supply chain in the centralized mode is studied by MATLAB numerical simulation. It provides reference for green supply chain members to formulate corresponding management strategies according to each other's risk preference degree.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research innovatively considers manufacturers and retailers to explore the market demand for product greenness. It introduces a novel “cost + risk sharing” contract to coordinate the green supply chain.\n","PeriodicalId":51675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Management Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The coordination mechanism of a risk-averse green supply chain\",\"authors\":\"Yuhong Wang, Xiaoqing Sheng, Y. Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cms-10-2021-0454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to establish a centralized decision-making game model and manufacturer-led Stackelberg game model based on factors of risk aversion of supply chain members and product greenness. The research aims to study whether the introduction of the “cost + risk sharing” contract affects coordination of this type of green supply by calculating the optimal decision of each mode.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis research designs a supply chain model under centralized and decentralized decision-making. This model uses the Stackelberg game to calculate the optimal decision under decentralized decision-making to evaluate the effect of a green supply chain and then analyze the “cost + risk sharing” contract and the degree of coordination of the supply chain. A sensitivity analysis is conducted on the centralized mode for the impact of variables on the supply chain.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis research finds a double marginalization effect in decentralized decision-making, and the risk aversion coefficient plays a decisive role in the utility of supply chain members. The specific range of risk- and cost-sharing factors allows supply chain members to achieve Pareto improvements and provides decision-making based on the corresponding management strategies according to each other’s risk preference degree.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe influence of each variable on the green supply chain in the centralized mode is studied by MATLAB numerical simulation. It provides reference for green supply chain members to formulate corresponding management strategies according to each other's risk preference degree.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research innovatively considers manufacturers and retailers to explore the market demand for product greenness. It introduces a novel “cost + risk sharing” contract to coordinate the green supply chain.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-10-2021-0454\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-10-2021-0454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在建立基于供应链成员风险规避和产品绿色度因素的集中式决策博弈模型和制造商主导的Stackelberg博弈模型。本研究旨在通过计算各模式的最优决策,研究“成本+风险共担”契约的引入是否会影响这类绿色供给的协调。本研究设计了一个集中式和分散式决策下的供应链模型。该模型利用Stackelberg博弈计算分散决策下的最优决策,评价绿色供应链的效果,进而分析“成本+风险共担”契约和供应链的协调程度。对集中模式下各变量对供应链的影响进行了敏感性分析。本研究发现分散决策存在双重边缘化效应,风险规避系数对供应链成员的效用起决定性作用。风险和成本分担因素的具体范围使供应链成员能够根据彼此的风险偏好程度实现帕累托改进,并提供基于相应管理策略的决策。研究局限性/启示通过MATLAB数值模拟研究了集中模式下各变量对绿色供应链的影响。为绿色供应链成员根据彼此的风险偏好程度制定相应的管理策略提供参考。原创性/价值本研究创新性地考虑制造商和零售商,探索市场对产品绿色的需求。引入了一种新型的“成本+风险共担”契约来协调绿色供应链。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The coordination mechanism of a risk-averse green supply chain
Purpose This study aims to establish a centralized decision-making game model and manufacturer-led Stackelberg game model based on factors of risk aversion of supply chain members and product greenness. The research aims to study whether the introduction of the “cost + risk sharing” contract affects coordination of this type of green supply by calculating the optimal decision of each mode. Design/methodology/approach This research designs a supply chain model under centralized and decentralized decision-making. This model uses the Stackelberg game to calculate the optimal decision under decentralized decision-making to evaluate the effect of a green supply chain and then analyze the “cost + risk sharing” contract and the degree of coordination of the supply chain. A sensitivity analysis is conducted on the centralized mode for the impact of variables on the supply chain. Findings This research finds a double marginalization effect in decentralized decision-making, and the risk aversion coefficient plays a decisive role in the utility of supply chain members. The specific range of risk- and cost-sharing factors allows supply chain members to achieve Pareto improvements and provides decision-making based on the corresponding management strategies according to each other’s risk preference degree. Research limitations/implications The influence of each variable on the green supply chain in the centralized mode is studied by MATLAB numerical simulation. It provides reference for green supply chain members to formulate corresponding management strategies according to each other's risk preference degree. Originality/value This research innovatively considers manufacturers and retailers to explore the market demand for product greenness. It introduces a novel “cost + risk sharing” contract to coordinate the green supply chain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信