书评:《海盗联盟:17世纪早期的爱尔兰和大西洋海盗》,作者:康妮·凯莱赫

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
Raymond Gillespie
{"title":"书评:《海盗联盟:17世纪早期的爱尔兰和大西洋海盗》,作者:康妮·凯莱赫","authors":"Raymond Gillespie","doi":"10.1177/03324893221133416e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"was (not including the £10,000 he owed the queen for the right to settle Antrim). It seems that a powerful motive for colonisation was personal profit that remained unrealised. Why, despite such significant investment by Essex and others (including the government in London), the settlement scheme remained unrealised is an intriguing question and is clearly bound up with the complex character of the earl. It also reflected some of the structural problems of the Elizabethan state. Heffernan argues that the most significant problem that Essex had to deal with was the queen herself, and particularly her inability to make decisions, and the Privy Council’s love of issuing contradictory orders that left Essex compromised in his dealing with O’Neill. These are valid insights but perhaps even more important than these was the inability of early modern central administrations to control events as complex and multi-faceted as plantations without any significant administrative support. The result, revealed in every settlement from Leix-Offaly to the Longford plantation of the seventeenth century, was the way in which local circumstances neutralised the best-laid plans of Dublin or London and changed the design and execution of settlement. More studies like this one will allow us to nuance this insight. For such studies, this is a model to follow with its rigorous analysis of sources and its careful narrative.","PeriodicalId":41191,"journal":{"name":"Irish Economic and Social History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: The Alliance of Pirates: Ireland and Atlantic Piracy in the Early Seventeenth Century by Connie Kelleher\",\"authors\":\"Raymond Gillespie\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03324893221133416e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"was (not including the £10,000 he owed the queen for the right to settle Antrim). It seems that a powerful motive for colonisation was personal profit that remained unrealised. Why, despite such significant investment by Essex and others (including the government in London), the settlement scheme remained unrealised is an intriguing question and is clearly bound up with the complex character of the earl. It also reflected some of the structural problems of the Elizabethan state. Heffernan argues that the most significant problem that Essex had to deal with was the queen herself, and particularly her inability to make decisions, and the Privy Council’s love of issuing contradictory orders that left Essex compromised in his dealing with O’Neill. These are valid insights but perhaps even more important than these was the inability of early modern central administrations to control events as complex and multi-faceted as plantations without any significant administrative support. The result, revealed in every settlement from Leix-Offaly to the Longford plantation of the seventeenth century, was the way in which local circumstances neutralised the best-laid plans of Dublin or London and changed the design and execution of settlement. More studies like this one will allow us to nuance this insight. For such studies, this is a model to follow with its rigorous analysis of sources and its careful narrative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Economic and Social History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Economic and Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03324893221133416e\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Economic and Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03324893221133416e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

是(不包括他为安特里姆定居权而欠女王的1万英镑)。殖民主义的一个强大动机似乎是仍未实现的个人利益。为什么尽管埃塞克斯郡和其他地方(包括伦敦政府)进行了如此重大的投资,但和解计划仍然没有实现,这是一个有趣的问题,显然与伯爵的复杂性格有关。它也反映了伊丽莎白时代国家的一些结构性问题。赫弗南认为,埃塞克斯郡必须处理的最重要的问题是女王本人,尤其是她无法做出决定,以及枢密院喜欢发布矛盾的命令,这让埃塞克斯郡在处理奥尼尔时妥协了。这些都是有效的见解,但也许比这些更重要的是,在没有任何重大行政支持的情况下,早期现代中央行政部门无法控制像种植园这样复杂和多方面的事件。从Leix Offaly到17世纪的Longford种植园的每一个定居点都揭示了这一结果,即当地环境抵消了都柏林或伦敦最好的规划,并改变了定居点的设计和执行。更多像这样的研究将使我们能够细致入微地了解这一点。对于这样的研究来说,这是一个对来源进行严格分析和仔细叙述的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: The Alliance of Pirates: Ireland and Atlantic Piracy in the Early Seventeenth Century by Connie Kelleher
was (not including the £10,000 he owed the queen for the right to settle Antrim). It seems that a powerful motive for colonisation was personal profit that remained unrealised. Why, despite such significant investment by Essex and others (including the government in London), the settlement scheme remained unrealised is an intriguing question and is clearly bound up with the complex character of the earl. It also reflected some of the structural problems of the Elizabethan state. Heffernan argues that the most significant problem that Essex had to deal with was the queen herself, and particularly her inability to make decisions, and the Privy Council’s love of issuing contradictory orders that left Essex compromised in his dealing with O’Neill. These are valid insights but perhaps even more important than these was the inability of early modern central administrations to control events as complex and multi-faceted as plantations without any significant administrative support. The result, revealed in every settlement from Leix-Offaly to the Longford plantation of the seventeenth century, was the way in which local circumstances neutralised the best-laid plans of Dublin or London and changed the design and execution of settlement. More studies like this one will allow us to nuance this insight. For such studies, this is a model to follow with its rigorous analysis of sources and its careful narrative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信