艺术教育革命实验一百年

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 ART
Eva Díaz
{"title":"艺术教育革命实验一百年","authors":"Eva Díaz","doi":"10.1080/00043249.2023.2239116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “One Hundred Years of Revolutionary Experiments in Visual Art Education” defines and clarifies four often-invoked yet elusive concepts in visual art and visual art pedagogy: “experimental,” “progressive,” “critical,” and “radical.” Using the Marxist-theory based Whitney Independent Study Program in New York as a case study, an institution now transitioning from over a half-century under the continuous leadership of director Ron Clark, it helps write the history of the past one hundred years of revolutionary art training. In particular, this essay argues that the critical theory in contemporary art education taught at organizations like the Whitney Program, though built on a foundation initiated by experimental art schools such as the Bauhaus, Black Mountain College, and Vkhutemas, has dramatically reinvented the terms in which progressive politics are understood in visual art. To truly understand the Whitney Program’s unique form of revolutionary experimentation requires contending with the radical element of its pedagogy as laid out in the definition this essay provides of radical pedagogy, that is, the ISP’s emphasis on social change. This emphasis comes to the ISP in large part from the Frankfurt School, which, beginning in the 1920s, embarked on a critique of the culture and social forms of modernity, exploring the anomie and alienation at the heart of capitalist class inequality. The ISP is radical in the literal meaning stemming from the Latin radix (root), as it questions the basis of art at an ideological level: what roles it serves, and how it can align with other forces in society advocating for social justice, racial, gender and class equality, and economic redistribution.","PeriodicalId":45681,"journal":{"name":"ART JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Hundred Years of Revolutionary Experiments in Art Education\",\"authors\":\"Eva Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00043249.2023.2239116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract “One Hundred Years of Revolutionary Experiments in Visual Art Education” defines and clarifies four often-invoked yet elusive concepts in visual art and visual art pedagogy: “experimental,” “progressive,” “critical,” and “radical.” Using the Marxist-theory based Whitney Independent Study Program in New York as a case study, an institution now transitioning from over a half-century under the continuous leadership of director Ron Clark, it helps write the history of the past one hundred years of revolutionary art training. In particular, this essay argues that the critical theory in contemporary art education taught at organizations like the Whitney Program, though built on a foundation initiated by experimental art schools such as the Bauhaus, Black Mountain College, and Vkhutemas, has dramatically reinvented the terms in which progressive politics are understood in visual art. To truly understand the Whitney Program’s unique form of revolutionary experimentation requires contending with the radical element of its pedagogy as laid out in the definition this essay provides of radical pedagogy, that is, the ISP’s emphasis on social change. This emphasis comes to the ISP in large part from the Frankfurt School, which, beginning in the 1920s, embarked on a critique of the culture and social forms of modernity, exploring the anomie and alienation at the heart of capitalist class inequality. The ISP is radical in the literal meaning stemming from the Latin radix (root), as it questions the basis of art at an ideological level: what roles it serves, and how it can align with other forces in society advocating for social justice, racial, gender and class equality, and economic redistribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ART JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ART JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2023.2239116\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ART JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2023.2239116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要《视觉艺术教育革命实验一百年》定义并阐明了视觉艺术和视觉艺术教育学中四个经常被提及但难以捉摸的概念:“实验性”、“进步性”、《批判性》和“激进性”,在导演罗恩·克拉克(Ron Clark)的持续领导下,该机构从半个多世纪以来的转型,帮助书写了过去一百年革命艺术训练的历史。特别是,本文认为,惠特尼计划等组织在当代艺术教育中教授的批判理论,尽管建立在包豪斯、黑山学院和Vkhutemas等实验艺术学校发起的基础上,但却戏剧性地重塑了视觉艺术中理解进步政治的术语。为了真正理解惠特尼计划独特的革命性实验形式,需要与本文对激进教育学的定义中所阐述的其教育学的激进元素进行斗争,即ISP对社会变革的重视。这种强调在很大程度上来自法兰克福学派,该学派从20世纪20年代开始对现代性的文化和社会形式进行批判,探索资本主义阶级不平等核心的失范和异化。ISP在字面意义上是激进的,源于拉丁词根,因为它在意识形态层面上质疑艺术的基础:它扮演什么角色,以及它如何与社会中倡导社会正义、种族、性别和阶级平等以及经济再分配的其他力量结盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One Hundred Years of Revolutionary Experiments in Art Education
Abstract “One Hundred Years of Revolutionary Experiments in Visual Art Education” defines and clarifies four often-invoked yet elusive concepts in visual art and visual art pedagogy: “experimental,” “progressive,” “critical,” and “radical.” Using the Marxist-theory based Whitney Independent Study Program in New York as a case study, an institution now transitioning from over a half-century under the continuous leadership of director Ron Clark, it helps write the history of the past one hundred years of revolutionary art training. In particular, this essay argues that the critical theory in contemporary art education taught at organizations like the Whitney Program, though built on a foundation initiated by experimental art schools such as the Bauhaus, Black Mountain College, and Vkhutemas, has dramatically reinvented the terms in which progressive politics are understood in visual art. To truly understand the Whitney Program’s unique form of revolutionary experimentation requires contending with the radical element of its pedagogy as laid out in the definition this essay provides of radical pedagogy, that is, the ISP’s emphasis on social change. This emphasis comes to the ISP in large part from the Frankfurt School, which, beginning in the 1920s, embarked on a critique of the culture and social forms of modernity, exploring the anomie and alienation at the heart of capitalist class inequality. The ISP is radical in the literal meaning stemming from the Latin radix (root), as it questions the basis of art at an ideological level: what roles it serves, and how it can align with other forces in society advocating for social justice, racial, gender and class equality, and economic redistribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信