使用箱线图广义极值学生化偏差和顺序栅栏的离群点检测方法的比较

A. Fitrianto, W. Z. A. Wan Muhamad, Suliana Kriswan, B. Susetyo
{"title":"使用箱线图广义极值学生化偏差和顺序栅栏的离群点检测方法的比较","authors":"A. Fitrianto, W. Z. A. Wan Muhamad, Suliana Kriswan, B. Susetyo","doi":"10.13170/aijst.11.1.23809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Outliers identification is essential in data analysis since it can make wrong inferential statistics. This study aimed to compare the performance of Boxplot, Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate (Generalized ESD), and Sequential Fences method in identifying outliers. A published dataset was used in the study. Based on preliminary outlier identification, the data did not contain outliers. Each outlier detection method's performance was evaluated by contaminating the original data with few outliers. The contaminations were conducted by replacing the two smallest and largest observations with outliers. The analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.2 for both original and contaminated data. We found that Sequential Fences have outstanding performance in identifying outliers compared to Boxplot and Generalized ESD.","PeriodicalId":7128,"journal":{"name":"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Outlier Detection Methods using Boxplot Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate and Sequential Fences\",\"authors\":\"A. Fitrianto, W. Z. A. Wan Muhamad, Suliana Kriswan, B. Susetyo\",\"doi\":\"10.13170/aijst.11.1.23809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Outliers identification is essential in data analysis since it can make wrong inferential statistics. This study aimed to compare the performance of Boxplot, Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate (Generalized ESD), and Sequential Fences method in identifying outliers. A published dataset was used in the study. Based on preliminary outlier identification, the data did not contain outliers. Each outlier detection method's performance was evaluated by contaminating the original data with few outliers. The contaminations were conducted by replacing the two smallest and largest observations with outliers. The analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.2 for both original and contaminated data. We found that Sequential Fences have outstanding performance in identifying outliers compared to Boxplot and Generalized ESD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13170/aijst.11.1.23809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13170/aijst.11.1.23809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

异常值识别在数据分析中是至关重要的,因为它可以做出错误的推断统计。本研究旨在比较Boxplot、广义极值研究偏差(广义ESD)和序列围栏方法在识别异常值方面的性能。研究中使用了已发表的数据集。根据初步异常值识别,数据不包含异常值。通过用很少的异常值污染原始数据来评估每种异常值检测方法的性能。污染是通过用异常值代替最小和最大的两个观测值来进行的。使用SAS 9.2版对原始数据和污染数据进行分析。我们发现,与Boxplot和广义ESD相比,序列围栏在识别异常值方面具有出色的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Outlier Detection Methods using Boxplot Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate and Sequential Fences
Outliers identification is essential in data analysis since it can make wrong inferential statistics. This study aimed to compare the performance of Boxplot, Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate (Generalized ESD), and Sequential Fences method in identifying outliers. A published dataset was used in the study. Based on preliminary outlier identification, the data did not contain outliers. Each outlier detection method's performance was evaluated by contaminating the original data with few outliers. The contaminations were conducted by replacing the two smallest and largest observations with outliers. The analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.2 for both original and contaminated data. We found that Sequential Fences have outstanding performance in identifying outliers compared to Boxplot and Generalized ESD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信