网络空间对公民社会的影响。最终改变游戏规则与否?

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Johana Evelyn Montalvan Castilla, C. Pursiainen
{"title":"网络空间对公民社会的影响。最终改变游戏规则与否?","authors":"Johana Evelyn Montalvan Castilla, C. Pursiainen","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2019.1672288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article studies the effects of the emergence of cyberspace, or digitization, on civil society, and develops an analytical framework to that effect. It is distinguished between four types of civil societies: apolitical, political, transnational, and uncivic. Each type of civil society is considered separately vis-à-vis cyberspace developments in order to understand what kind of civil society is enhanced by these developments and, conversely, what kind of civil society is constrained. This understanding helps inform how cyberspace has changed the more generic society-state relations. While one can identify many instrumental changes and developments in civil society practices, the article concludes that the emergence of cyberspace has not profoundly changed society in terms of the relative power of one type of civil society over another. Thus, its transformative power is rather limited in a more fundamental sense. The empirical focus of the article is on Norwegian civil society, representing a Western developed democratic state, but it is argued that while the empirical results may vary, the analytical framework can arguably be applied and tailored to any society.","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":"15 1","pages":"392 - 411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2019.1672288","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyberspace Effects on Civil Society. The Ultimate Game-Changer or Not?\",\"authors\":\"Johana Evelyn Montalvan Castilla, C. Pursiainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17448689.2019.1672288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The article studies the effects of the emergence of cyberspace, or digitization, on civil society, and develops an analytical framework to that effect. It is distinguished between four types of civil societies: apolitical, political, transnational, and uncivic. Each type of civil society is considered separately vis-à-vis cyberspace developments in order to understand what kind of civil society is enhanced by these developments and, conversely, what kind of civil society is constrained. This understanding helps inform how cyberspace has changed the more generic society-state relations. While one can identify many instrumental changes and developments in civil society practices, the article concludes that the emergence of cyberspace has not profoundly changed society in terms of the relative power of one type of civil society over another. Thus, its transformative power is rather limited in a more fundamental sense. The empirical focus of the article is on Norwegian civil society, representing a Western developed democratic state, but it is argued that while the empirical results may vary, the analytical framework can arguably be applied and tailored to any society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"392 - 411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2019.1672288\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2019.1672288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2019.1672288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要本文研究了网络空间或数字化的出现对公民社会的影响,并为此建立了一个分析框架。它分为四类民间社会:非政治性、政治性、跨国性和非文明性。每种类型的民间社会都与网络空间的发展分开考虑,以了解什么样的民间社会因这些发展而得到加强,反过来,什么样的公民社会受到限制。这种理解有助于了解网络空间如何改变了更普遍的社会-国家关系。虽然人们可以确定民间社会实践中的许多工具性变化和发展,但文章得出结论,网络空间的出现并没有深刻改变一种民间社会对另一种民间团体的相对权力。因此,从更根本的意义上讲,它的变革力量是相当有限的。这篇文章的实证重点是挪威公民社会,代表着一个西方发达的民主国家,但有人认为,虽然实证结果可能有所不同,但分析框架可以应用于任何社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cyberspace Effects on Civil Society. The Ultimate Game-Changer or Not?
ABSTRACT The article studies the effects of the emergence of cyberspace, or digitization, on civil society, and develops an analytical framework to that effect. It is distinguished between four types of civil societies: apolitical, political, transnational, and uncivic. Each type of civil society is considered separately vis-à-vis cyberspace developments in order to understand what kind of civil society is enhanced by these developments and, conversely, what kind of civil society is constrained. This understanding helps inform how cyberspace has changed the more generic society-state relations. While one can identify many instrumental changes and developments in civil society practices, the article concludes that the emergence of cyberspace has not profoundly changed society in terms of the relative power of one type of civil society over another. Thus, its transformative power is rather limited in a more fundamental sense. The empirical focus of the article is on Norwegian civil society, representing a Western developed democratic state, but it is argued that while the empirical results may vary, the analytical framework can arguably be applied and tailored to any society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信