康复身份和健康:“康复”还是“康复中”更好?

D. Best, C. Andersson, J. Irving, M. Edwards
{"title":"康复身份和健康:“康复”还是“康复中”更好?","authors":"D. Best, C. Andersson, J. Irving, M. Edwards","doi":"10.1080/1556035X.2016.1272071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although there has been debate about the meaning of recovery, there has been little discussion about how people characterize their own recovery experience, in particular whether people describe themselves as recovered (as with a therapeutic community [TC] philosophy) or as in recovery (typically those engaged in 12-step). The article assesses differences in wellbeing as a function of recovery self-ascriptions, based on the UK Life in Recovery survey. Those who described themselves as recovered or ex-addicts reported better psychological health and lower identification with addicts and recovery and showed stronger recovery functioning. There are clearly multiple pathways to recovery, and philosophy may impact on both trajectory of recovery and the social identity mechanisms underpinning change.","PeriodicalId":88011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","volume":"12 1","pages":"27 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1556035X.2016.1272071","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovery Identity and Wellbeing: Is It Better to be ‘Recovered’ or ‘in Recovery’?\",\"authors\":\"D. Best, C. Andersson, J. Irving, M. Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1556035X.2016.1272071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Although there has been debate about the meaning of recovery, there has been little discussion about how people characterize their own recovery experience, in particular whether people describe themselves as recovered (as with a therapeutic community [TC] philosophy) or as in recovery (typically those engaged in 12-step). The article assesses differences in wellbeing as a function of recovery self-ascriptions, based on the UK Life in Recovery survey. Those who described themselves as recovered or ex-addicts reported better psychological health and lower identification with addicts and recovery and showed stronger recovery functioning. There are clearly multiple pathways to recovery, and philosophy may impact on both trajectory of recovery and the social identity mechanisms underpinning change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1556035X.2016.1272071\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2016.1272071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2016.1272071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

摘要尽管关于康复的含义一直存在争议,但关于人们如何描述自己的康复经历,尤其是人们是将自己描述为康复(就像治疗社区[TC]的哲学一样)还是处于康复中(通常是那些从事12步康复的人),几乎没有讨论。这篇文章根据英国康复生活调查,评估了幸福感的差异与康复自我归属的关系。那些自称已康复或已戒毒的人报告说,他们的心理健康状况更好,对瘾君子和康复者的认同度更低,康复功能更强。显然,复苏有多种途径,哲学可能会影响复苏的轨迹和支撑变革的社会认同机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recovery Identity and Wellbeing: Is It Better to be ‘Recovered’ or ‘in Recovery’?
ABSTRACT Although there has been debate about the meaning of recovery, there has been little discussion about how people characterize their own recovery experience, in particular whether people describe themselves as recovered (as with a therapeutic community [TC] philosophy) or as in recovery (typically those engaged in 12-step). The article assesses differences in wellbeing as a function of recovery self-ascriptions, based on the UK Life in Recovery survey. Those who described themselves as recovered or ex-addicts reported better psychological health and lower identification with addicts and recovery and showed stronger recovery functioning. There are clearly multiple pathways to recovery, and philosophy may impact on both trajectory of recovery and the social identity mechanisms underpinning change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信