Omnipresent Chemicals:TSA在PFAS污染后的优先权

Q3 Environmental Science
Frederick A. McDonald
{"title":"Omnipresent Chemicals:TSA在PFAS污染后的优先权","authors":"Frederick A. McDonald","doi":"10.1080/10406026.2020.1754631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Given the amplified concern surrounding PFAS, states are proactively filing lawsuits on behalf of their citizens and enacting legislation to combat this nation-wide contamination epidemic. However, given the 2016 Amendment to the Toxic Substances Control Act, states looking to regulate the manufacturing or looking to ratify a state-wide ban on the manufacturing of such chemicals may face preemption under actions taken by the U.S. EPA. This article focuses on the possible loss of state autonomy with regards to PFAS regulation and addresses issues states might face given the restrictive nature of the newly enacted preemption provisions of TSCA.","PeriodicalId":11761,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Claims Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"265 - 288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10406026.2020.1754631","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omnipresent Chemicals: TSCA Preemption in the Wake of PFAS Contamination\",\"authors\":\"Frederick A. McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10406026.2020.1754631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Given the amplified concern surrounding PFAS, states are proactively filing lawsuits on behalf of their citizens and enacting legislation to combat this nation-wide contamination epidemic. However, given the 2016 Amendment to the Toxic Substances Control Act, states looking to regulate the manufacturing or looking to ratify a state-wide ban on the manufacturing of such chemicals may face preemption under actions taken by the U.S. EPA. This article focuses on the possible loss of state autonomy with regards to PFAS regulation and addresses issues states might face given the restrictive nature of the newly enacted preemption provisions of TSCA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Claims Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"265 - 288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10406026.2020.1754631\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Claims Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2020.1754631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Claims Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2020.1754631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要鉴于对PFAS的担忧加剧,各州正在积极代表其公民提起诉讼,并制定立法来对抗这一全国性的污染流行病。然而,鉴于2016年《有毒物质控制法修正案》,根据美国环保局采取的行动,希望监管此类化学品的生产或批准全州范围内禁止此类化学品生产的州可能会面临优先权。本文重点关注PFAS监管方面可能失去的国家自主权,并解决了鉴于新颁布的TSCA优先购买权条款的限制性质,各州可能面临的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Omnipresent Chemicals: TSCA Preemption in the Wake of PFAS Contamination
Abstract Given the amplified concern surrounding PFAS, states are proactively filing lawsuits on behalf of their citizens and enacting legislation to combat this nation-wide contamination epidemic. However, given the 2016 Amendment to the Toxic Substances Control Act, states looking to regulate the manufacturing or looking to ratify a state-wide ban on the manufacturing of such chemicals may face preemption under actions taken by the U.S. EPA. This article focuses on the possible loss of state autonomy with regards to PFAS regulation and addresses issues states might face given the restrictive nature of the newly enacted preemption provisions of TSCA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Claims Journal
Environmental Claims Journal Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The Environmental Claims Journal is a quarterly journal that focuses on the many types of claims and liabilities that result from environmental exposures. The ECJ considers environmental claims under older business insurance policies, coverage and claims under more recent environmental insurance policies, as well as toxic tort claims. Exposures and claims from all environmental media are considered: air, drinking water, groundwater, soil, chemicals in commerce and naturally occurring chemicals. The journal also considers the laws, regulations, and case law that form the basis for claims. The journal would be of interest to environmental and insurance attorneys, insurance professionals, claims professionals, and environmental consultants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信