汉语负循环

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Barbara Meisterernst
{"title":"汉语负循环","authors":"Barbara Meisterernst","doi":"10.1075/jhl.21026.mei","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The present discussion proposes that renewal processes in the domain of negation manifest themselves predominantly\n in the change from bi-morphemic, synthetic negation to analytic negation neg+aux by introducing a new auxiliary verb as\n verbal head. Some of these new verbs may subsequently be merged with the negator resulting into new bi-morphemic negation. The\n proposed analyticization process accounts for different kinds of complex negation, including aspectual and modal negation, the\n copula and negative focus markers. I propose a unified mechanism for the morpho-syntactic processes, which change the system of\n negation in Chinese. Two morpho-syntactic factors contribute to this particular grammaticalization process of Chinese: (1) the\n diachronically consistent head initial word order within the functional and the lexical (CP/vP) domains (with the\n exception of sentence-final particles); and (2) the morpho-phonological rule that negation has to attach directly to aux,\n i.e., to a weak verbal head. Based on particularly the second constraint, I propose that only the combination\n neg+aux\n mod leads to the emergence of new fused negators constituting the head of a Negative/Modal phrase,\n i.e., a negative phrase (NegP) with modal features. The renewal process of the verbal heads of bi-morphemic negation is caused by\n semantic bleaching and an increasing intransparency of the negator which triggers the grammaticalization of new (often defective)\n lexical verbs via upward movement from the lexical to the functional domain. It accounts for the grammaticalization of the\n aspectual negator wèi 未, of the\n (negative) copula of Early Archaic Chinese into focus marker and complementizer, and for the replacement of synthetic by analytic\n modal negation neg\n mod > neg+aux\n mod.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The negative cycle in Chinese\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Meisterernst\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhl.21026.mei\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The present discussion proposes that renewal processes in the domain of negation manifest themselves predominantly\\n in the change from bi-morphemic, synthetic negation to analytic negation neg+aux by introducing a new auxiliary verb as\\n verbal head. Some of these new verbs may subsequently be merged with the negator resulting into new bi-morphemic negation. The\\n proposed analyticization process accounts for different kinds of complex negation, including aspectual and modal negation, the\\n copula and negative focus markers. I propose a unified mechanism for the morpho-syntactic processes, which change the system of\\n negation in Chinese. Two morpho-syntactic factors contribute to this particular grammaticalization process of Chinese: (1) the\\n diachronically consistent head initial word order within the functional and the lexical (CP/vP) domains (with the\\n exception of sentence-final particles); and (2) the morpho-phonological rule that negation has to attach directly to aux,\\n i.e., to a weak verbal head. Based on particularly the second constraint, I propose that only the combination\\n neg+aux\\n mod leads to the emergence of new fused negators constituting the head of a Negative/Modal phrase,\\n i.e., a negative phrase (NegP) with modal features. The renewal process of the verbal heads of bi-morphemic negation is caused by\\n semantic bleaching and an increasing intransparency of the negator which triggers the grammaticalization of new (often defective)\\n lexical verbs via upward movement from the lexical to the functional domain. It accounts for the grammaticalization of the\\n aspectual negator wèi 未, of the\\n (negative) copula of Early Archaic Chinese into focus marker and complementizer, and for the replacement of synthetic by analytic\\n modal negation neg\\n mod > neg+aux\\n mod.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21026.mei\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21026.mei","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过引入一个新的助动词作为动词头,提出否定领域的更新过程主要表现为从双语素、合成否定向分析否定neg+aux的转变。这些新动词中的一些可能随后与否定词合并,从而形成新的双语素否定。所提出的分析过程考虑了不同类型的复杂否定,包括体否定和语气否定、系词和负焦点标记。我提出了一个统一的形态句法过程机制,它改变了汉语否定系统。两个形态句法因素促成了汉语这种特殊的语法化过程:(1)在功能域和词汇域(CP/vP)内(句尾助词除外),首词词序历时一致;以及(2)否定必须直接附加在aux上的形态-语音规则,即附加在弱语首上。特别是基于第二个约束,我提出只有neg+aux-mod的组合才会导致新的融合否定子的出现,这些否定子构成否定/模态短语的头部,即具有模态特征的否定短语(NegP)。双语素否定语头的更新过程是由语义漂白和否定词的内部稀疏性增加引起的,这通过从词汇域到功能域的向上运动触发了新的(通常有缺陷的)词汇动词的语法化。它解释了方面否定词wèi的语法化未, 将早期古汉语的(负)系词转换为焦点标记和补语词,并用分析语气否定否定否定否定neg-mod>neg+aux-mod代替合成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The negative cycle in Chinese
The present discussion proposes that renewal processes in the domain of negation manifest themselves predominantly in the change from bi-morphemic, synthetic negation to analytic negation neg+aux by introducing a new auxiliary verb as verbal head. Some of these new verbs may subsequently be merged with the negator resulting into new bi-morphemic negation. The proposed analyticization process accounts for different kinds of complex negation, including aspectual and modal negation, the copula and negative focus markers. I propose a unified mechanism for the morpho-syntactic processes, which change the system of negation in Chinese. Two morpho-syntactic factors contribute to this particular grammaticalization process of Chinese: (1) the diachronically consistent head initial word order within the functional and the lexical (CP/vP) domains (with the exception of sentence-final particles); and (2) the morpho-phonological rule that negation has to attach directly to aux, i.e., to a weak verbal head. Based on particularly the second constraint, I propose that only the combination neg+aux mod leads to the emergence of new fused negators constituting the head of a Negative/Modal phrase, i.e., a negative phrase (NegP) with modal features. The renewal process of the verbal heads of bi-morphemic negation is caused by semantic bleaching and an increasing intransparency of the negator which triggers the grammaticalization of new (often defective) lexical verbs via upward movement from the lexical to the functional domain. It accounts for the grammaticalization of the aspectual negator wèi 未, of the (negative) copula of Early Archaic Chinese into focus marker and complementizer, and for the replacement of synthetic by analytic modal negation neg mod > neg+aux mod.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Journal of Historical Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信