结合数字市场的传统零售商绩效指标:通过数据包络分析(dea)进行基准测试

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Isotilia Costa Melo, P. N. A. Junior, J. S. Callefi, T. K. Kodama, M. S. Nagano, D. Rebelatto
{"title":"结合数字市场的传统零售商绩效指标:通过数据包络分析(dea)进行基准测试","authors":"Isotilia Costa Melo, P. N. A. Junior, J. S. Callefi, T. K. Kodama, M. S. Nagano, D. Rebelatto","doi":"10.1080/10919392.2023.2177070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In competitive markets, such as electronic commerce, evaluations of base-level performance and benchmarking are fundamental for retailers focusing efforts. Hence, we propose a new and practical approach to measuring retailers’ relative performance and benchmarking through a unique index that integrates digital, physical, and financial factors. We investigated 13 traditional retailers controlling 36 marketplaces (i.e., online platforms) in Brazil in 2020. The traffic to the marketplace, the companies’ inventory, capital intensity (physical infrastructure), and gross margin were used in the slacks-based measure and data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, followed by a slacks-based measure super-efficiency model for the sensitivity analysis. Companies’ relative performance is then determined, as well as thei customized targets for achieving efficiency. Three types of marketplaces are explored: pure (direct sales from suppliers to consumers for a fee), reselling (products purchased from suppliers and resold), and hybrid (both options direct and resale, depending on the product). Although data envelopment analysis has already been applied to examine retailers’ performance, there are few extant applications to e-commerce. Our findings show that retailers who operate through specialized (normally reselling) marketplaces tend to be inefficient, and retailers prefer to manage one non-specialized (normally hybrid) marketplace and focus efforts on achieving efficiency instead of managing many marketplaces inefficiently.","PeriodicalId":54777,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce","volume":"32 1","pages":"196 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A PERFORMANCE INDEX FOR TRADITIONAL RETAILERS INCORPORATING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE: BENCHMARKING THROUGH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA)\",\"authors\":\"Isotilia Costa Melo, P. N. A. Junior, J. S. Callefi, T. K. Kodama, M. S. Nagano, D. Rebelatto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10919392.2023.2177070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In competitive markets, such as electronic commerce, evaluations of base-level performance and benchmarking are fundamental for retailers focusing efforts. Hence, we propose a new and practical approach to measuring retailers’ relative performance and benchmarking through a unique index that integrates digital, physical, and financial factors. We investigated 13 traditional retailers controlling 36 marketplaces (i.e., online platforms) in Brazil in 2020. The traffic to the marketplace, the companies’ inventory, capital intensity (physical infrastructure), and gross margin were used in the slacks-based measure and data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, followed by a slacks-based measure super-efficiency model for the sensitivity analysis. Companies’ relative performance is then determined, as well as thei customized targets for achieving efficiency. Three types of marketplaces are explored: pure (direct sales from suppliers to consumers for a fee), reselling (products purchased from suppliers and resold), and hybrid (both options direct and resale, depending on the product). Although data envelopment analysis has already been applied to examine retailers’ performance, there are few extant applications to e-commerce. Our findings show that retailers who operate through specialized (normally reselling) marketplaces tend to be inefficient, and retailers prefer to manage one non-specialized (normally hybrid) marketplace and focus efforts on achieving efficiency instead of managing many marketplaces inefficiently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"196 - 216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2023.2177070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2023.2177070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在竞争激烈的市场中,如电子商务,对基本水平的绩效和基准的评估是零售商集中精力的基础。因此,我们提出了一种新的、实用的方法来衡量零售商的相对表现和基准,通过一个独特的指数,整合了数字、物理和财务因素。我们调查了2020年在巴西控制36个市场(即在线平台)的13家传统零售商。在基于松弛测度和数据包络分析(DEA)模型中,采用了市场流量、公司库存、资本密集度(物理基础设施)和毛利率,然后采用基于松弛测度的超效率模型进行敏感性分析。然后确定公司的相对绩效,以及他们为实现效率而定制的目标。本文探讨了三种类型的市场:纯市场(从供应商直接向消费者收取费用)、转售市场(从供应商购买产品并转售)和混合市场(根据产品的不同,有直接和转售两种选择)。虽然数据包络分析已经被用于检验零售商的绩效,但在电子商务中的应用很少。我们的研究结果表明,通过专业化(通常是转售)市场经营的零售商往往效率低下,零售商更愿意管理一个非专业化(通常是混合)市场,并将精力集中在实现效率上,而不是低效地管理多个市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A PERFORMANCE INDEX FOR TRADITIONAL RETAILERS INCORPORATING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE: BENCHMARKING THROUGH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA)
ABSTRACT In competitive markets, such as electronic commerce, evaluations of base-level performance and benchmarking are fundamental for retailers focusing efforts. Hence, we propose a new and practical approach to measuring retailers’ relative performance and benchmarking through a unique index that integrates digital, physical, and financial factors. We investigated 13 traditional retailers controlling 36 marketplaces (i.e., online platforms) in Brazil in 2020. The traffic to the marketplace, the companies’ inventory, capital intensity (physical infrastructure), and gross margin were used in the slacks-based measure and data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, followed by a slacks-based measure super-efficiency model for the sensitivity analysis. Companies’ relative performance is then determined, as well as thei customized targets for achieving efficiency. Three types of marketplaces are explored: pure (direct sales from suppliers to consumers for a fee), reselling (products purchased from suppliers and resold), and hybrid (both options direct and resale, depending on the product). Although data envelopment analysis has already been applied to examine retailers’ performance, there are few extant applications to e-commerce. Our findings show that retailers who operate through specialized (normally reselling) marketplaces tend to be inefficient, and retailers prefer to manage one non-specialized (normally hybrid) marketplace and focus efforts on achieving efficiency instead of managing many marketplaces inefficiently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce
Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
17.20%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce (JOCEC) is to publish quality, fresh, and innovative work that will make a difference for future research and practice rather than focusing on well-established research areas. JOCEC publishes original research that explores the relationships between computer/communication technology and the design, operations, and performance of organizations. This includes implications of the technologies for organizational structure and dynamics, technological advances to keep pace with changes of organizations and their environments, emerging technological possibilities for improving organizational performance, and the many facets of electronic business. Theoretical, experimental, survey, and design science research are all welcome and might look at: • E-commerce • Collaborative commerce • Interorganizational systems • Enterprise systems • Supply chain technologies • Computer-supported cooperative work • Computer-aided coordination • Economics of organizational computing • Technologies for organizational learning • Behavioral aspects of organizational computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信