Isotilia Costa Melo, P. N. A. Junior, J. S. Callefi, T. K. Kodama, M. S. Nagano, D. Rebelatto
{"title":"结合数字市场的传统零售商绩效指标:通过数据包络分析(dea)进行基准测试","authors":"Isotilia Costa Melo, P. N. A. Junior, J. S. Callefi, T. K. Kodama, M. S. Nagano, D. Rebelatto","doi":"10.1080/10919392.2023.2177070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In competitive markets, such as electronic commerce, evaluations of base-level performance and benchmarking are fundamental for retailers focusing efforts. Hence, we propose a new and practical approach to measuring retailers’ relative performance and benchmarking through a unique index that integrates digital, physical, and financial factors. We investigated 13 traditional retailers controlling 36 marketplaces (i.e., online platforms) in Brazil in 2020. The traffic to the marketplace, the companies’ inventory, capital intensity (physical infrastructure), and gross margin were used in the slacks-based measure and data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, followed by a slacks-based measure super-efficiency model for the sensitivity analysis. Companies’ relative performance is then determined, as well as thei customized targets for achieving efficiency. Three types of marketplaces are explored: pure (direct sales from suppliers to consumers for a fee), reselling (products purchased from suppliers and resold), and hybrid (both options direct and resale, depending on the product). Although data envelopment analysis has already been applied to examine retailers’ performance, there are few extant applications to e-commerce. Our findings show that retailers who operate through specialized (normally reselling) marketplaces tend to be inefficient, and retailers prefer to manage one non-specialized (normally hybrid) marketplace and focus efforts on achieving efficiency instead of managing many marketplaces inefficiently.","PeriodicalId":54777,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce","volume":"32 1","pages":"196 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A PERFORMANCE INDEX FOR TRADITIONAL RETAILERS INCORPORATING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE: BENCHMARKING THROUGH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA)\",\"authors\":\"Isotilia Costa Melo, P. N. A. Junior, J. S. Callefi, T. K. Kodama, M. S. Nagano, D. Rebelatto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10919392.2023.2177070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In competitive markets, such as electronic commerce, evaluations of base-level performance and benchmarking are fundamental for retailers focusing efforts. Hence, we propose a new and practical approach to measuring retailers’ relative performance and benchmarking through a unique index that integrates digital, physical, and financial factors. We investigated 13 traditional retailers controlling 36 marketplaces (i.e., online platforms) in Brazil in 2020. The traffic to the marketplace, the companies’ inventory, capital intensity (physical infrastructure), and gross margin were used in the slacks-based measure and data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, followed by a slacks-based measure super-efficiency model for the sensitivity analysis. Companies’ relative performance is then determined, as well as thei customized targets for achieving efficiency. Three types of marketplaces are explored: pure (direct sales from suppliers to consumers for a fee), reselling (products purchased from suppliers and resold), and hybrid (both options direct and resale, depending on the product). Although data envelopment analysis has already been applied to examine retailers’ performance, there are few extant applications to e-commerce. Our findings show that retailers who operate through specialized (normally reselling) marketplaces tend to be inefficient, and retailers prefer to manage one non-specialized (normally hybrid) marketplace and focus efforts on achieving efficiency instead of managing many marketplaces inefficiently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"196 - 216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2023.2177070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2023.2177070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A PERFORMANCE INDEX FOR TRADITIONAL RETAILERS INCORPORATING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE: BENCHMARKING THROUGH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA)
ABSTRACT In competitive markets, such as electronic commerce, evaluations of base-level performance and benchmarking are fundamental for retailers focusing efforts. Hence, we propose a new and practical approach to measuring retailers’ relative performance and benchmarking through a unique index that integrates digital, physical, and financial factors. We investigated 13 traditional retailers controlling 36 marketplaces (i.e., online platforms) in Brazil in 2020. The traffic to the marketplace, the companies’ inventory, capital intensity (physical infrastructure), and gross margin were used in the slacks-based measure and data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, followed by a slacks-based measure super-efficiency model for the sensitivity analysis. Companies’ relative performance is then determined, as well as thei customized targets for achieving efficiency. Three types of marketplaces are explored: pure (direct sales from suppliers to consumers for a fee), reselling (products purchased from suppliers and resold), and hybrid (both options direct and resale, depending on the product). Although data envelopment analysis has already been applied to examine retailers’ performance, there are few extant applications to e-commerce. Our findings show that retailers who operate through specialized (normally reselling) marketplaces tend to be inefficient, and retailers prefer to manage one non-specialized (normally hybrid) marketplace and focus efforts on achieving efficiency instead of managing many marketplaces inefficiently.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce (JOCEC) is to publish quality, fresh, and innovative work that will make a difference for future research and practice rather than focusing on well-established research areas.
JOCEC publishes original research that explores the relationships between computer/communication technology and the design, operations, and performance of organizations. This includes implications of the technologies for organizational structure and dynamics, technological advances to keep pace with changes of organizations and their environments, emerging technological possibilities for improving organizational performance, and the many facets of electronic business.
Theoretical, experimental, survey, and design science research are all welcome and might look at:
• E-commerce
• Collaborative commerce
• Interorganizational systems
• Enterprise systems
• Supply chain technologies
• Computer-supported cooperative work
• Computer-aided coordination
• Economics of organizational computing
• Technologies for organizational learning
• Behavioral aspects of organizational computing.