子宫颈癌体积调弧治疗与调强放疗的剂量学比较分析

R. He
{"title":"子宫颈癌体积调弧治疗与调强放疗的剂量学比较分析","authors":"R. He","doi":"10.26689/par.v7i3.4937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To carry out dosimetric comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in cervical cancer. Methods: 50 postoperative cervical cancer patients were included in this study. The patients were admitted for treatment from January 2021 to January 2022. VMAT and IMRT plans were designed for each patient to analyze the dose distribution in the target area of the two treatment techniques. Results: Comparing the monitor unit for single treatment (638.21 ± 116.21 MU) and time of single treatment (143.21 ± 23.14 s) in the observation group and the monitor unit for single treatment (932.14 ± 74.11 MU) and time of single treatment (223.14 ± 17.26 s) in the control group, there was significant difference (P < 0.05); there was also significant difference (P < 0.05) between the normal tissue (bladder and rectum) of the observation group and that (bladder and rectum) of the control group. Conclusion: VMAT is more effective in cervical cancer, and it has a certain protective effect on normal tissues in patients and can reduce the radiation dose.","PeriodicalId":61025,"journal":{"name":"抗癌研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric Comparative Analysis of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Cervical Cancer\",\"authors\":\"R. He\",\"doi\":\"10.26689/par.v7i3.4937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To carry out dosimetric comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in cervical cancer. Methods: 50 postoperative cervical cancer patients were included in this study. The patients were admitted for treatment from January 2021 to January 2022. VMAT and IMRT plans were designed for each patient to analyze the dose distribution in the target area of the two treatment techniques. Results: Comparing the monitor unit for single treatment (638.21 ± 116.21 MU) and time of single treatment (143.21 ± 23.14 s) in the observation group and the monitor unit for single treatment (932.14 ± 74.11 MU) and time of single treatment (223.14 ± 17.26 s) in the control group, there was significant difference (P < 0.05); there was also significant difference (P < 0.05) between the normal tissue (bladder and rectum) of the observation group and that (bladder and rectum) of the control group. Conclusion: VMAT is more effective in cervical cancer, and it has a certain protective effect on normal tissues in patients and can reduce the radiation dose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":61025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"抗癌研究\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"抗癌研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26689/par.v7i3.4937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"抗癌研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/par.v7i3.4937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对宫颈癌症体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)和强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)的剂量进行比较。方法:将50例癌症术后患者纳入本研究。患者于2021年1月至2022年1月入院接受治疗。为每位患者设计VMAT和IMRT计划,以分析两种治疗技术在目标区域的剂量分布。结果:观察组单次治疗监测单元(638.21±116.21 MU)和单次治疗时间(143.21±23.14 s)与对照组单次处理监测单元(932.14±74.11 MU)和单一治疗时间(223.14±17.26 s)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的正常组织(膀胱和直肠)与对照组的膀胱和直肠之间也有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:VMAT治疗宫颈癌症疗效确切,对患者正常组织有一定的保护作用,可减少放疗剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dosimetric Comparative Analysis of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Cervical Cancer
Objective: To carry out dosimetric comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in cervical cancer. Methods: 50 postoperative cervical cancer patients were included in this study. The patients were admitted for treatment from January 2021 to January 2022. VMAT and IMRT plans were designed for each patient to analyze the dose distribution in the target area of the two treatment techniques. Results: Comparing the monitor unit for single treatment (638.21 ± 116.21 MU) and time of single treatment (143.21 ± 23.14 s) in the observation group and the monitor unit for single treatment (932.14 ± 74.11 MU) and time of single treatment (223.14 ± 17.26 s) in the control group, there was significant difference (P < 0.05); there was also significant difference (P < 0.05) between the normal tissue (bladder and rectum) of the observation group and that (bladder and rectum) of the control group. Conclusion: VMAT is more effective in cervical cancer, and it has a certain protective effect on normal tissues in patients and can reduce the radiation dose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信