{"title":"碧昂斯和特朗普:舞蹈中的翻唱","authors":"P. Manley","doi":"10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Is copying unavoidable? Is it an inherent element of creativity? When is imitation appropriate? Justifiable? Beneficial? Welcomed? What actually gets copied? Form? Intention? Aesthetics? Concepts? What about energy? Can you copy that? What about cultural appropriation or the powerful plundering the disenfranchised? These questions all bubbled up during a creative process inspired by Krumping. To discuss these questions further, the author revisits an incident that caused a mini-furor. Beyoncé Knowles was accused of plagiarizing sections of Rosas danst Rosas, an avant-garde contemporary dance by Anna Teresa De Keersmaeker. Subsequent media discussions were filled with side-taking, indignance, and justification. But what did these two women do? What did their narrative reveal about dance, about fields of practice, about intentions, protocols, permissions, silences, acknowledgements, ethics, race relations, and feminism? The complexity of these questions creates a spinning disco ball of perspectives.","PeriodicalId":40211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture","volume":"3 1","pages":"258 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyoncé and the Frump: Cover-Versioning in Dance\",\"authors\":\"P. Manley\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Is copying unavoidable? Is it an inherent element of creativity? When is imitation appropriate? Justifiable? Beneficial? Welcomed? What actually gets copied? Form? Intention? Aesthetics? Concepts? What about energy? Can you copy that? What about cultural appropriation or the powerful plundering the disenfranchised? These questions all bubbled up during a creative process inspired by Krumping. To discuss these questions further, the author revisits an incident that caused a mini-furor. Beyoncé Knowles was accused of plagiarizing sections of Rosas danst Rosas, an avant-garde contemporary dance by Anna Teresa De Keersmaeker. Subsequent media discussions were filled with side-taking, indignance, and justification. But what did these two women do? What did their narrative reveal about dance, about fields of practice, about intentions, protocols, permissions, silences, acknowledgements, ethics, race relations, and feminism? The complexity of these questions creates a spinning disco ball of perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"258 - 284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
抄袭是不可避免的吗?它是创造力的固有元素吗?什么时候模仿是合适的?正当吗?有益的吗?欢迎吗?什么被复制了?形式?意图吗?美学?概念?那能源呢?你能听懂吗?那文化挪用或者权力掠夺被剥夺公民权的人呢?这些问题都是在受Krumping启发的创作过程中冒出来的。为了进一步讨论这些问题,作者回顾了一个引起小骚动的事件。beyoncess Knowles被指控抄袭Anna Teresa De Keersmaeker的前卫现代舞《Rosas danst Rosas》的部分内容。随后的媒体讨论充斥着偏袒、愤怒和辩解。但这两个女人做了什么?他们的叙述揭示了舞蹈、实践领域、意图、协议、许可、沉默、承认、伦理、种族关系和女权主义的什么?这些问题的复杂性创造了一个旋转的迪斯科球的观点。
abstract:Is copying unavoidable? Is it an inherent element of creativity? When is imitation appropriate? Justifiable? Beneficial? Welcomed? What actually gets copied? Form? Intention? Aesthetics? Concepts? What about energy? Can you copy that? What about cultural appropriation or the powerful plundering the disenfranchised? These questions all bubbled up during a creative process inspired by Krumping. To discuss these questions further, the author revisits an incident that caused a mini-furor. Beyoncé Knowles was accused of plagiarizing sections of Rosas danst Rosas, an avant-garde contemporary dance by Anna Teresa De Keersmaeker. Subsequent media discussions were filled with side-taking, indignance, and justification. But what did these two women do? What did their narrative reveal about dance, about fields of practice, about intentions, protocols, permissions, silences, acknowledgements, ethics, race relations, and feminism? The complexity of these questions creates a spinning disco ball of perspectives.