碧昂斯和特朗普:舞蹈中的翻唱

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
P. Manley
{"title":"碧昂斯和特朗普:舞蹈中的翻唱","authors":"P. Manley","doi":"10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Is copying unavoidable? Is it an inherent element of creativity? When is imitation appropriate? Justifiable? Beneficial? Welcomed? What actually gets copied? Form? Intention? Aesthetics? Concepts? What about energy? Can you copy that? What about cultural appropriation or the powerful plundering the disenfranchised? These questions all bubbled up during a creative process inspired by Krumping. To discuss these questions further, the author revisits an incident that caused a mini-furor. Beyoncé Knowles was accused of plagiarizing sections of Rosas danst Rosas, an avant-garde contemporary dance by Anna Teresa De Keersmaeker. Subsequent media discussions were filled with side-taking, indignance, and justification. But what did these two women do? What did their narrative reveal about dance, about fields of practice, about intentions, protocols, permissions, silences, acknowledgements, ethics, race relations, and feminism? The complexity of these questions creates a spinning disco ball of perspectives.","PeriodicalId":40211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture","volume":"3 1","pages":"258 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyoncé and the Frump: Cover-Versioning in Dance\",\"authors\":\"P. Manley\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Is copying unavoidable? Is it an inherent element of creativity? When is imitation appropriate? Justifiable? Beneficial? Welcomed? What actually gets copied? Form? Intention? Aesthetics? Concepts? What about energy? Can you copy that? What about cultural appropriation or the powerful plundering the disenfranchised? These questions all bubbled up during a creative process inspired by Krumping. To discuss these questions further, the author revisits an incident that caused a mini-furor. Beyoncé Knowles was accused of plagiarizing sections of Rosas danst Rosas, an avant-garde contemporary dance by Anna Teresa De Keersmaeker. Subsequent media discussions were filled with side-taking, indignance, and justification. But what did these two women do? What did their narrative reveal about dance, about fields of practice, about intentions, protocols, permissions, silences, acknowledgements, ethics, race relations, and feminism? The complexity of these questions creates a spinning disco ball of perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"258 - 284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

抄袭是不可避免的吗?它是创造力的固有元素吗?什么时候模仿是合适的?正当吗?有益的吗?欢迎吗?什么被复制了?形式?意图吗?美学?概念?那能源呢?你能听懂吗?那文化挪用或者权力掠夺被剥夺公民权的人呢?这些问题都是在受Krumping启发的创作过程中冒出来的。为了进一步讨论这些问题,作者回顾了一个引起小骚动的事件。beyoncess Knowles被指控抄袭Anna Teresa De Keersmaeker的前卫现代舞《Rosas danst Rosas》的部分内容。随后的媒体讨论充斥着偏袒、愤怒和辩解。但这两个女人做了什么?他们的叙述揭示了舞蹈、实践领域、意图、协议、许可、沉默、承认、伦理、种族关系和女权主义的什么?这些问题的复杂性创造了一个旋转的迪斯科球的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyoncé and the Frump: Cover-Versioning in Dance
abstract:Is copying unavoidable? Is it an inherent element of creativity? When is imitation appropriate? Justifiable? Beneficial? Welcomed? What actually gets copied? Form? Intention? Aesthetics? Concepts? What about energy? Can you copy that? What about cultural appropriation or the powerful plundering the disenfranchised? These questions all bubbled up during a creative process inspired by Krumping. To discuss these questions further, the author revisits an incident that caused a mini-furor. Beyoncé Knowles was accused of plagiarizing sections of Rosas danst Rosas, an avant-garde contemporary dance by Anna Teresa De Keersmaeker. Subsequent media discussions were filled with side-taking, indignance, and justification. But what did these two women do? What did their narrative reveal about dance, about fields of practice, about intentions, protocols, permissions, silences, acknowledgements, ethics, race relations, and feminism? The complexity of these questions creates a spinning disco ball of perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture
Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信