基于主客观测量的汽车自动驾驶模拟用户舒适性分析

Q2 Engineering
Muhammad Nur Aliff Mohd Norzam, J. Karjanto, N. Md. Yusof, M. Z. Hassan, Abd Fathul Hakim Zulkifli, Ahmad Azad Ab Rashid
{"title":"基于主客观测量的汽车自动驾驶模拟用户舒适性分析","authors":"Muhammad Nur Aliff Mohd Norzam, J. Karjanto, N. Md. Yusof, M. Z. Hassan, Abd Fathul Hakim Zulkifli, Ahmad Azad Ab Rashid","doi":"10.31603/ae.6913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The naturalistic study investigated the potential influence of personal driving preferences (assertive and defensive driving style) on users; comfort when being driven in an automated vehicle with a defensive driving style. Adopted the Wizard of Oz design, the study involved three phases: pre-, during, and post-driven to measure their comfort, perceived safety, and likeness as well as motion sickness propensity through self-report questionnaire and heart rate variation. After answering a set of questionnaires, participants were exposed to simulated driving in an automated vehicle with a defensive driving style. A statistical analysis produced no statistically significant difference between assertive and defensive participants. This indicates an overall preference, perceived comfort without severe motion sickness propensity to the defensive driving style of the autonomous vehicle, regardless of participants’ personal driving styles.","PeriodicalId":36133,"journal":{"name":"Automotive Experiences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of User’s Comfort on Automated Vehicle Riding Simulation using Subjective and Objective Measurements\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Nur Aliff Mohd Norzam, J. Karjanto, N. Md. Yusof, M. Z. Hassan, Abd Fathul Hakim Zulkifli, Ahmad Azad Ab Rashid\",\"doi\":\"10.31603/ae.6913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The naturalistic study investigated the potential influence of personal driving preferences (assertive and defensive driving style) on users; comfort when being driven in an automated vehicle with a defensive driving style. Adopted the Wizard of Oz design, the study involved three phases: pre-, during, and post-driven to measure their comfort, perceived safety, and likeness as well as motion sickness propensity through self-report questionnaire and heart rate variation. After answering a set of questionnaires, participants were exposed to simulated driving in an automated vehicle with a defensive driving style. A statistical analysis produced no statistically significant difference between assertive and defensive participants. This indicates an overall preference, perceived comfort without severe motion sickness propensity to the defensive driving style of the autonomous vehicle, regardless of participants’ personal driving styles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automotive Experiences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automotive Experiences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31603/ae.6913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive Experiences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/ae.6913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然主义研究考察了个人驾驶偏好(自信型和防御性驾驶风格)对用户的潜在影响;驾驶具有防御性驾驶风格的自动驾驶汽车时的舒适性。本研究采用绿野仙踪设计,分为前、中、后三个阶段,通过自述问卷和心率变化来衡量他们的舒适度、感知安全性、相似性和晕动病倾向。在回答了一组问卷后,参与者被暴露在一辆防御性驾驶风格的自动驾驶汽车中模拟驾驶。一项统计分析显示,在自信的参与者和防御性的参与者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。这表明,无论参与者的个人驾驶风格如何,他们对自动驾驶汽车的整体偏好,即没有严重晕动病的感知舒适倾向于防御性驾驶风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of User’s Comfort on Automated Vehicle Riding Simulation using Subjective and Objective Measurements
The naturalistic study investigated the potential influence of personal driving preferences (assertive and defensive driving style) on users; comfort when being driven in an automated vehicle with a defensive driving style. Adopted the Wizard of Oz design, the study involved three phases: pre-, during, and post-driven to measure their comfort, perceived safety, and likeness as well as motion sickness propensity through self-report questionnaire and heart rate variation. After answering a set of questionnaires, participants were exposed to simulated driving in an automated vehicle with a defensive driving style. A statistical analysis produced no statistically significant difference between assertive and defensive participants. This indicates an overall preference, perceived comfort without severe motion sickness propensity to the defensive driving style of the autonomous vehicle, regardless of participants’ personal driving styles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Automotive Experiences
Automotive Experiences Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信