{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行对职业治疗实践的影响:系统综述","authors":"Špela Mihevc, Zorana Sicherl, Katarina Galof","doi":"10.29011/2688-7460.100082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: COVID-19 circumstances and related restrictions affected health care service delivery. Health care service delivery, including occupational therapy, transitioned from usual face-to-face therapy to telehealth. Purpose of the systematic review was to examine the experiences using telehealth in occupational therapy. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, Cochrane, OT seeker, Web of Science, and the Sage journal databases was searched. The PRISMA protocol was followed and applied to the review. Articles not including occupational therapy, letters to editor and editorials were excluded from the review. Evidence levels for the articles were determined based on the ranking system by OCEBM Levels. Results: Articles describing the use of telehealth in occupational therapy services were included. Eleven studies rated levels V, IV, and II reached the review criteria and five themes were identified. The emerged themes were: (a) development of new skills, (b) therapist attitudes toward telehealth, (c) user satisfaction with telehealth services, (d) need for interprofessional collaboration, (e) positive and negative factors in service delivery. Conclusions: There is limited evidence on occupational therapists’ perceptions in using telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only occupational therapists but also other health professionals should be more encouraged and supported by teams, management, and policies to be part of telehealth services in times of pandemics. Innovative strategies should be developed in occupational therapy to provide continuous service delivery aimed in maintaining occupational therapy goal, engagement, and participation for occupational therapy users. Providing telehealth services, not just in occupational therapy, should be administered and supported through legislation.","PeriodicalId":93553,"journal":{"name":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Occupational Therapy Practice: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Špela Mihevc, Zorana Sicherl, Katarina Galof\",\"doi\":\"10.29011/2688-7460.100082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: COVID-19 circumstances and related restrictions affected health care service delivery. Health care service delivery, including occupational therapy, transitioned from usual face-to-face therapy to telehealth. Purpose of the systematic review was to examine the experiences using telehealth in occupational therapy. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, Cochrane, OT seeker, Web of Science, and the Sage journal databases was searched. The PRISMA protocol was followed and applied to the review. Articles not including occupational therapy, letters to editor and editorials were excluded from the review. Evidence levels for the articles were determined based on the ranking system by OCEBM Levels. Results: Articles describing the use of telehealth in occupational therapy services were included. Eleven studies rated levels V, IV, and II reached the review criteria and five themes were identified. The emerged themes were: (a) development of new skills, (b) therapist attitudes toward telehealth, (c) user satisfaction with telehealth services, (d) need for interprofessional collaboration, (e) positive and negative factors in service delivery. Conclusions: There is limited evidence on occupational therapists’ perceptions in using telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only occupational therapists but also other health professionals should be more encouraged and supported by teams, management, and policies to be part of telehealth services in times of pandemics. Innovative strategies should be developed in occupational therapy to provide continuous service delivery aimed in maintaining occupational therapy goal, engagement, and participation for occupational therapy users. Providing telehealth services, not just in occupational therapy, should be administered and supported through legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family medicine and primary care -- open access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family medicine and primary care -- open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:COVID-19环境和相关限制影响了卫生保健服务的提供。保健服务的提供,包括职业治疗,从通常的面对面治疗过渡到远程保健。本系统回顾的目的是探讨远程医疗在职业治疗中的应用经验。方法:检索PubMed、Science Direct、CINAHL、Cochrane、OT seeker、Web of Science、Sage等期刊数据库。遵循PRISMA方案并将其应用于审查。不包括职业治疗、给编辑的信和社论的文章被排除在综述之外。文章的证据水平是根据OCEBM levels的排名系统确定的。结果:纳入了描述远程医疗在职业治疗服务中的应用的文章。11项被评为V、IV和II级的研究达到了审查标准,并确定了5个主题。新出现的主题是:(a)新技能的发展;(b)治疗师对远程保健的态度;(c)用户对远程保健服务的满意度;(d)跨专业协作的需要;(e)服务提供中的积极因素和消极因素。结论:COVID-19大流行期间,职业治疗师对使用远程医疗的看法的证据有限。团队、管理层和政策应更多地鼓励和支持职业治疗师以及其他卫生专业人员在大流行期间成为远程保健服务的一部分。应该在职业治疗中开发创新策略,以提供持续的服务,旨在保持职业治疗目标,参与和参与职业治疗用户。应通过立法管理和支持提供远程保健服务,而不仅仅是在职业治疗方面。
The Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Occupational Therapy Practice: A Systematic Review
Introduction: COVID-19 circumstances and related restrictions affected health care service delivery. Health care service delivery, including occupational therapy, transitioned from usual face-to-face therapy to telehealth. Purpose of the systematic review was to examine the experiences using telehealth in occupational therapy. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, Cochrane, OT seeker, Web of Science, and the Sage journal databases was searched. The PRISMA protocol was followed and applied to the review. Articles not including occupational therapy, letters to editor and editorials were excluded from the review. Evidence levels for the articles were determined based on the ranking system by OCEBM Levels. Results: Articles describing the use of telehealth in occupational therapy services were included. Eleven studies rated levels V, IV, and II reached the review criteria and five themes were identified. The emerged themes were: (a) development of new skills, (b) therapist attitudes toward telehealth, (c) user satisfaction with telehealth services, (d) need for interprofessional collaboration, (e) positive and negative factors in service delivery. Conclusions: There is limited evidence on occupational therapists’ perceptions in using telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only occupational therapists but also other health professionals should be more encouraged and supported by teams, management, and policies to be part of telehealth services in times of pandemics. Innovative strategies should be developed in occupational therapy to provide continuous service delivery aimed in maintaining occupational therapy goal, engagement, and participation for occupational therapy users. Providing telehealth services, not just in occupational therapy, should be administered and supported through legislation.