Le Cong Dinh, David Henry Mguni, Long Tran-Thanh, Jun Wang, Yaodong Yang
{"title":"具有非遗忘战略对手的在线马尔可夫决策过程","authors":"Le Cong Dinh, David Henry Mguni, Long Tran-Thanh, Jun Wang, Yaodong Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10458-023-09599-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study a novel setting in Online Markov Decision Processes (OMDPs) where the loss function is chosen by a <i>non-oblivious</i> strategic adversary who follows a no-external regret algorithm. In this setting, we first demonstrate that MDP-Expert, an existing algorithm that works well with oblivious adversaries can still apply and achieve a policy regret bound of <span>\\({\\mathcal {O}}(\\sqrt{T \\log (L)}+\\tau ^2\\sqrt{ T \\log (\\vert A \\vert )})\\)</span> where <i>L</i> is the size of adversary’s pure strategy set and <span>\\(\\vert A \\vert\\)</span> denotes the size of agent’s action space.Considering real-world games where the support size of a NE is small, we further propose a new algorithm: <i>MDP-Online Oracle Expert</i> (MDP-OOE), that achieves a policy regret bound of <span>\\({\\mathcal {O}}(\\sqrt{T\\log (L)}+\\tau ^2\\sqrt{ T k \\log (k)})\\)</span> where <i>k</i> depends only on the support size of the NE. MDP-OOE leverages the key benefit of Double Oracle in game theory and thus can solve games with prohibitively large action space. Finally, to better understand the learning dynamics of no-regret methods, under the same setting of no-external regret adversary in OMDPs, we introduce an algorithm that achieves last-round convergence to a NE result. To our best knowledge, this is the first work leading to the last iteration result in OMDPs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55586,"journal":{"name":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Markov decision processes with non-oblivious strategic adversary\",\"authors\":\"Le Cong Dinh, David Henry Mguni, Long Tran-Thanh, Jun Wang, Yaodong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10458-023-09599-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We study a novel setting in Online Markov Decision Processes (OMDPs) where the loss function is chosen by a <i>non-oblivious</i> strategic adversary who follows a no-external regret algorithm. In this setting, we first demonstrate that MDP-Expert, an existing algorithm that works well with oblivious adversaries can still apply and achieve a policy regret bound of <span>\\\\({\\\\mathcal {O}}(\\\\sqrt{T \\\\log (L)}+\\\\tau ^2\\\\sqrt{ T \\\\log (\\\\vert A \\\\vert )})\\\\)</span> where <i>L</i> is the size of adversary’s pure strategy set and <span>\\\\(\\\\vert A \\\\vert\\\\)</span> denotes the size of agent’s action space.Considering real-world games where the support size of a NE is small, we further propose a new algorithm: <i>MDP-Online Oracle Expert</i> (MDP-OOE), that achieves a policy regret bound of <span>\\\\({\\\\mathcal {O}}(\\\\sqrt{T\\\\log (L)}+\\\\tau ^2\\\\sqrt{ T k \\\\log (k)})\\\\)</span> where <i>k</i> depends only on the support size of the NE. MDP-OOE leverages the key benefit of Double Oracle in game theory and thus can solve games with prohibitively large action space. Finally, to better understand the learning dynamics of no-regret methods, under the same setting of no-external regret adversary in OMDPs, we introduce an algorithm that achieves last-round convergence to a NE result. To our best knowledge, this is the first work leading to the last iteration result in OMDPs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-023-09599-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-023-09599-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Online Markov decision processes with non-oblivious strategic adversary
We study a novel setting in Online Markov Decision Processes (OMDPs) where the loss function is chosen by a non-oblivious strategic adversary who follows a no-external regret algorithm. In this setting, we first demonstrate that MDP-Expert, an existing algorithm that works well with oblivious adversaries can still apply and achieve a policy regret bound of \({\mathcal {O}}(\sqrt{T \log (L)}+\tau ^2\sqrt{ T \log (\vert A \vert )})\) where L is the size of adversary’s pure strategy set and \(\vert A \vert\) denotes the size of agent’s action space.Considering real-world games where the support size of a NE is small, we further propose a new algorithm: MDP-Online Oracle Expert (MDP-OOE), that achieves a policy regret bound of \({\mathcal {O}}(\sqrt{T\log (L)}+\tau ^2\sqrt{ T k \log (k)})\) where k depends only on the support size of the NE. MDP-OOE leverages the key benefit of Double Oracle in game theory and thus can solve games with prohibitively large action space. Finally, to better understand the learning dynamics of no-regret methods, under the same setting of no-external regret adversary in OMDPs, we introduce an algorithm that achieves last-round convergence to a NE result. To our best knowledge, this is the first work leading to the last iteration result in OMDPs.
期刊介绍:
This is the official journal of the International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. It provides a leading forum for disseminating significant original research results in the foundations, theory, development, analysis, and applications of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Coverage in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems includes, but is not limited to:
Agent decision-making architectures and their evaluation, including: cognitive models; knowledge representation; logics for agency; ontological reasoning; planning (single and multi-agent); reasoning (single and multi-agent)
Cooperation and teamwork, including: distributed problem solving; human-robot/agent interaction; multi-user/multi-virtual-agent interaction; coalition formation; coordination
Agent communication languages, including: their semantics, pragmatics, and implementation; agent communication protocols and conversations; agent commitments; speech act theory
Ontologies for agent systems, agents and the semantic web, agents and semantic web services, Grid-based systems, and service-oriented computing
Agent societies and societal issues, including: artificial social systems; environments, organizations and institutions; ethical and legal issues; privacy, safety and security; trust, reliability and reputation
Agent-based system development, including: agent development techniques, tools and environments; agent programming languages; agent specification or validation languages
Agent-based simulation, including: emergent behavior; participatory simulation; simulation techniques, tools and environments; social simulation
Agreement technologies, including: argumentation; collective decision making; judgment aggregation and belief merging; negotiation; norms
Economic paradigms, including: auction and mechanism design; bargaining and negotiation; economically-motivated agents; game theory (cooperative and non-cooperative); social choice and voting
Learning agents, including: computational architectures for learning agents; evolution, adaptation; multi-agent learning.
Robotic agents, including: integrated perception, cognition, and action; cognitive robotics; robot planning (including action and motion planning); multi-robot systems.
Virtual agents, including: agents in games and virtual environments; companion and coaching agents; modeling personality, emotions; multimodal interaction; verbal and non-verbal expressiveness
Significant, novel applications of agent technology
Comprehensive reviews and authoritative tutorials of research and practice in agent systems
Comprehensive and authoritative reviews of books dealing with agents and multi-agent systems.