加纳可用的几种酒精基洗手液(ABHS)的相对杀菌效果

J. Mensah, Gideon Dela Akorsu, Charles Anamoah
{"title":"加纳可用的几种酒精基洗手液(ABHS)的相对杀菌效果","authors":"J. Mensah, Gideon Dela Akorsu, Charles Anamoah","doi":"10.1080/23312009.2017.1317317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The liberal use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS) for hand disinfection has raised questions regarding the bactericidal efficacies of brands that are widely available in Ghana. Ten different brands of hand sanitizers bearing different chemical constituents and originating from six different countries were purchased in Kumasi, Ghana. The 10 samples represent the only available brands in the retail market. Purchased brands were examined for their relative bactericidal efficacies with the combined use of agar well diffusion, broth dilution, and viable bacterial count reduction assays. Serially diluted solutions of the ABHS displayed variable brand-specific bactericidal efficacies against a panel of bacteria specimen that comprised three gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pneumonia) and three gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi) in the agar well diffusion and in the broth dilution assays. Neither gram-positive nor gram-negative bacteria strains showed a clear pattern of preferential susceptibility to the growth inhibitory activities of any of the examined brands of ABHS. Only HS9 displayed a full spectrum bactericidal activity against all bacteria species in agar diffusion assay. Full strength ABHS formulations demonstrated brand-based rapid bactericidal action on hands of volunteers in a pattern best described as a post-ABHS-treatment reduction in levels of viable bacteria hand counts. HS9 displayed the highest efficacy and this relative estimation held true in all the three assays utilized for the assessment of bactericidal efficacies.","PeriodicalId":10640,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23312009.2017.1317317","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative bactericidal efficacies of a selection of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS) available in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"J. Mensah, Gideon Dela Akorsu, Charles Anamoah\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23312009.2017.1317317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The liberal use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS) for hand disinfection has raised questions regarding the bactericidal efficacies of brands that are widely available in Ghana. Ten different brands of hand sanitizers bearing different chemical constituents and originating from six different countries were purchased in Kumasi, Ghana. The 10 samples represent the only available brands in the retail market. Purchased brands were examined for their relative bactericidal efficacies with the combined use of agar well diffusion, broth dilution, and viable bacterial count reduction assays. Serially diluted solutions of the ABHS displayed variable brand-specific bactericidal efficacies against a panel of bacteria specimen that comprised three gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pneumonia) and three gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi) in the agar well diffusion and in the broth dilution assays. Neither gram-positive nor gram-negative bacteria strains showed a clear pattern of preferential susceptibility to the growth inhibitory activities of any of the examined brands of ABHS. Only HS9 displayed a full spectrum bactericidal activity against all bacteria species in agar diffusion assay. Full strength ABHS formulations demonstrated brand-based rapid bactericidal action on hands of volunteers in a pattern best described as a post-ABHS-treatment reduction in levels of viable bacteria hand counts. HS9 displayed the highest efficacy and this relative estimation held true in all the three assays utilized for the assessment of bactericidal efficacies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cogent Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23312009.2017.1317317\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cogent Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2017.1317317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2017.1317317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:酒精洗手液(ABHS)在手部消毒中的广泛使用引发了人们对加纳广泛使用的品牌杀菌效果的质疑。在加纳库马西购买了10种不同品牌的洗手液,这些洗手液含有不同的化学成分,原产于六个不同的国家。这10个样品代表了零售市场上唯一可用的品牌。通过琼脂孔扩散、肉汤稀释和活菌计数减少测定的组合使用,检查购买品牌的相对杀菌效力。ABHS的系列稀释溶液在琼脂孔扩散和肉汤稀释中对一组细菌样本显示出不同的品牌特异性杀菌效力,该细菌样本包括三种革兰氏阳性细菌(金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、肺炎链球菌)和三种革兰氏阴性细菌(大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、伤寒沙门氏菌)化验。革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌菌株均未显示出对任何检测品牌的ABHS的生长抑制活性的明显优先易感性。在琼脂扩散试验中,只有HS9对所有细菌显示出全谱杀菌活性。全强度ABHS制剂在志愿者手上表现出基于品牌的快速杀菌作用,这种模式最好描述为ABHS治疗后活细菌手数水平的降低。HS9显示出最高的效力,并且该相对估计在用于评估杀菌效力的所有三种测定中都成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative bactericidal efficacies of a selection of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS) available in Ghana
Abstract The liberal use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS) for hand disinfection has raised questions regarding the bactericidal efficacies of brands that are widely available in Ghana. Ten different brands of hand sanitizers bearing different chemical constituents and originating from six different countries were purchased in Kumasi, Ghana. The 10 samples represent the only available brands in the retail market. Purchased brands were examined for their relative bactericidal efficacies with the combined use of agar well diffusion, broth dilution, and viable bacterial count reduction assays. Serially diluted solutions of the ABHS displayed variable brand-specific bactericidal efficacies against a panel of bacteria specimen that comprised three gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pneumonia) and three gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi) in the agar well diffusion and in the broth dilution assays. Neither gram-positive nor gram-negative bacteria strains showed a clear pattern of preferential susceptibility to the growth inhibitory activities of any of the examined brands of ABHS. Only HS9 displayed a full spectrum bactericidal activity against all bacteria species in agar diffusion assay. Full strength ABHS formulations demonstrated brand-based rapid bactericidal action on hands of volunteers in a pattern best described as a post-ABHS-treatment reduction in levels of viable bacteria hand counts. HS9 displayed the highest efficacy and this relative estimation held true in all the three assays utilized for the assessment of bactericidal efficacies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cogent Chemistry
Cogent Chemistry CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信