起飞和悬停四旋翼位置PID控制、Backstepping和Backstepping PDPI的比较

Jumiyatun Jumiyatun
{"title":"起飞和悬停四旋翼位置PID控制、Backstepping和Backstepping PDPI的比较","authors":"Jumiyatun Jumiyatun","doi":"10.20342/IJSMM.4.1.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractQuadcopter is one of the best types of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), which is currently growing rapidly in the mechatronics research area. Take-off and hover are a very important fly phase that has to be owned by quadcopter. So, the quadcopter can be utilized optimally, where altitude and angle are fixed. In addition, quadcopter is a complex system that is unstable and can be difficult to fly without any control system, so it is needed the right method to keep the stability in phase of take-off and hover. This paper investigates the comparison method between a proportional-integralderivative (PID), backstepping and combining backstepping PD PI methods as its control. Non-linier model was used to simulate the quadcopter with physical modeling. The results show that the methods are able to set the height and angle of quadcopter with a very small height errors 0.0804, 0.0156 and 0.0132 m, while the angle is always zero as desired.","PeriodicalId":30772,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of PID control, Backstepping, Backstepping PDPI on Take-off and Hover Quadcopter Position\",\"authors\":\"Jumiyatun Jumiyatun\",\"doi\":\"10.20342/IJSMM.4.1.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractQuadcopter is one of the best types of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), which is currently growing rapidly in the mechatronics research area. Take-off and hover are a very important fly phase that has to be owned by quadcopter. So, the quadcopter can be utilized optimally, where altitude and angle are fixed. In addition, quadcopter is a complex system that is unstable and can be difficult to fly without any control system, so it is needed the right method to keep the stability in phase of take-off and hover. This paper investigates the comparison method between a proportional-integralderivative (PID), backstepping and combining backstepping PD PI methods as its control. Non-linier model was used to simulate the quadcopter with physical modeling. The results show that the methods are able to set the height and angle of quadcopter with a very small height errors 0.0804, 0.0156 and 0.0132 m, while the angle is always zero as desired.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20342/IJSMM.4.1.147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20342/IJSMM.4.1.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要四轴飞行器是目前机电一体化研究领域发展最为迅速的无人机类型之一。起飞和悬停是四轴飞行器必须拥有的一个非常重要的飞行阶段。因此,在高度和角度固定的情况下,四轴飞行器可以得到最佳利用。此外,四轴飞行器是一个不稳定的复杂系统,在没有任何控制系统的情况下很难飞行,因此需要正确的方法来保持起飞和悬停阶段的稳定性。本文研究了比例积分导数(PID)、反步和结合反步PD PI方法作为其控制的比较方法。采用非线性模型对四轴飞行器进行物理建模。结果表明,该方法能够实现四轴飞行器高度和角度的设置,高度误差非常小,分别为0.0804、0.0156和0.0132 m,而角度始终为零。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of PID control, Backstepping, Backstepping PDPI on Take-off and Hover Quadcopter Position
AbstractQuadcopter is one of the best types of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), which is currently growing rapidly in the mechatronics research area. Take-off and hover are a very important fly phase that has to be owned by quadcopter. So, the quadcopter can be utilized optimally, where altitude and angle are fixed. In addition, quadcopter is a complex system that is unstable and can be difficult to fly without any control system, so it is needed the right method to keep the stability in phase of take-off and hover. This paper investigates the comparison method between a proportional-integralderivative (PID), backstepping and combining backstepping PD PI methods as its control. Non-linier model was used to simulate the quadcopter with physical modeling. The results show that the methods are able to set the height and angle of quadcopter with a very small height errors 0.0804, 0.0156 and 0.0132 m, while the angle is always zero as desired.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信