为行动不便的航空乘客制定更好的政策

IF 0.4 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Konstantinos Malagas, Ridha Aditya Nugraha, Sofoklis Alepis, N. Nikitakos, Rio Christiawan, Vicia Sacharissa
{"title":"为行动不便的航空乘客制定更好的政策","authors":"Konstantinos Malagas, Ridha Aditya Nugraha, Sofoklis Alepis, N. Nikitakos, Rio Christiawan, Vicia Sacharissa","doi":"10.20858/sjsutst.2023.119.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Persons with reduced mobility (PRM) should enjoy the same rights as other people in all life aspects, including in terms of travel experience. PRM group is an undeveloped travel market segment, having specific needs that the aviation organizations should satisfy. The facilitation of air travel for PRM should be supported by, among others, clear standards and appropriate regulations and laws. The present study focuses on the European Union (EU) and ASEAN regulatory framework for PRM, presenting various issues and suggesting improvements. The paper is theoretical in nature. It compares various regulations and laws that are implemented in the two Regions, and from thereafter suggestions are generated. The study shows that the European Union has a more efficient regulatory framework that better responds to the transportation chain and the needs of the various groups of PRM. The ASEAN Region can adopt some functional regulations and practices from the European Region. Also, the emphasis should be moved from persons with disabilities to PRM accompanied by the necessary rules, mainly from the ASEAN side. PRM makes up a significant potential market segment in aviation and relevant studies will be beneficial. The study provides significant insights for the aviation industry, particularly for these two Regions, the various groups of PRM, and the policymakers.","PeriodicalId":43740,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TOWARDS A BETTER POLICY FOR AIRLINE PASSENGERS WITH REDUCED MOBILITY\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Malagas, Ridha Aditya Nugraha, Sofoklis Alepis, N. Nikitakos, Rio Christiawan, Vicia Sacharissa\",\"doi\":\"10.20858/sjsutst.2023.119.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Persons with reduced mobility (PRM) should enjoy the same rights as other people in all life aspects, including in terms of travel experience. PRM group is an undeveloped travel market segment, having specific needs that the aviation organizations should satisfy. The facilitation of air travel for PRM should be supported by, among others, clear standards and appropriate regulations and laws. The present study focuses on the European Union (EU) and ASEAN regulatory framework for PRM, presenting various issues and suggesting improvements. The paper is theoretical in nature. It compares various regulations and laws that are implemented in the two Regions, and from thereafter suggestions are generated. The study shows that the European Union has a more efficient regulatory framework that better responds to the transportation chain and the needs of the various groups of PRM. The ASEAN Region can adopt some functional regulations and practices from the European Region. Also, the emphasis should be moved from persons with disabilities to PRM accompanied by the necessary rules, mainly from the ASEAN side. PRM makes up a significant potential market segment in aviation and relevant studies will be beneficial. The study provides significant insights for the aviation industry, particularly for these two Regions, the various groups of PRM, and the policymakers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2023.119.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2023.119.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行动不便的人应在生活的各个方面享有与其他人相同的权利,包括在旅行体验方面。PRM集团是一个未开发的旅游细分市场,有航空组织应该满足的特定需求。除其他外,应通过明确的标准和适当的法规和法律来支持PRM的航空旅行便利化。本研究的重点是欧盟和东盟的PRM监管框架,提出了各种问题并提出了改进建议。这篇论文具有理论性质。它比较了两个地区实施的各种法规和法律,并从中提出了建议。研究表明,欧盟有一个更有效的监管框架,可以更好地响应运输链和PRM各群体的需求。东盟地区可以采用欧洲地区的一些职能法规和做法。此外,重点应该从残疾人转移到PRM,并辅之以必要的规则,主要来自东盟方面。PRM在航空领域构成了一个重要的潜在细分市场,相关研究将是有益的。该研究为航空业,特别是这两个地区、PRM的各个团体和政策制定者提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TOWARDS A BETTER POLICY FOR AIRLINE PASSENGERS WITH REDUCED MOBILITY
Persons with reduced mobility (PRM) should enjoy the same rights as other people in all life aspects, including in terms of travel experience. PRM group is an undeveloped travel market segment, having specific needs that the aviation organizations should satisfy. The facilitation of air travel for PRM should be supported by, among others, clear standards and appropriate regulations and laws. The present study focuses on the European Union (EU) and ASEAN regulatory framework for PRM, presenting various issues and suggesting improvements. The paper is theoretical in nature. It compares various regulations and laws that are implemented in the two Regions, and from thereafter suggestions are generated. The study shows that the European Union has a more efficient regulatory framework that better responds to the transportation chain and the needs of the various groups of PRM. The ASEAN Region can adopt some functional regulations and practices from the European Region. Also, the emphasis should be moved from persons with disabilities to PRM accompanied by the necessary rules, mainly from the ASEAN side. PRM makes up a significant potential market segment in aviation and relevant studies will be beneficial. The study provides significant insights for the aviation industry, particularly for these two Regions, the various groups of PRM, and the policymakers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信