日本“剖腹产”:对日本孕产妇和围产期中心的全国调查结果

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
K. Takagi, Mitsue Muraoka
{"title":"日本“剖腹产”:对日本孕产妇和围产期中心的全国调查结果","authors":"K. Takagi, Mitsue Muraoka","doi":"10.14390/JSSHP.HRP2019-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: “En caul” cesarean section can prevent mechanical damage to preterm babies upon cesarean delivery, by intentionally not rupturing the fetal membranes. This survey investigates its prevalence, indications, and advantages and disadvantages in Japan. Methods: Questionnaires were posted to all registered Level 2 and Level 3 maternal and perinatal centers (where most premature babies are delivered) in Japan ( n = 327). Percentages of centers are presented as survey results. Results: Response rate was 53.2%. En caul cesarean section was employed in 43.2% and 81.6% of Level 2 and 3 centers, respectively. Gestational age considered for en caul cesarean section was less than 31 weeks in 75.9% of centers. Low transverse and vertical uterine incisions were made at 64% and 29% of centers, respectively. En caul cesarean section was considered useful by 87% of centers. However, nearly one-third of the respondents noted that this procedure presents some technical difficulties if membranes happen to rupture accidentally before the delivery of the fetus is complete. Conclusions: En caul cesarean section is a routine cesarean delivery technique used for preterm","PeriodicalId":42505,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cesarean delivery “en caul” in Japan: Results of a national survey of maternal and perinatal centers in Japan\",\"authors\":\"K. Takagi, Mitsue Muraoka\",\"doi\":\"10.14390/JSSHP.HRP2019-006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: “En caul” cesarean section can prevent mechanical damage to preterm babies upon cesarean delivery, by intentionally not rupturing the fetal membranes. This survey investigates its prevalence, indications, and advantages and disadvantages in Japan. Methods: Questionnaires were posted to all registered Level 2 and Level 3 maternal and perinatal centers (where most premature babies are delivered) in Japan ( n = 327). Percentages of centers are presented as survey results. Results: Response rate was 53.2%. En caul cesarean section was employed in 43.2% and 81.6% of Level 2 and 3 centers, respectively. Gestational age considered for en caul cesarean section was less than 31 weeks in 75.9% of centers. Low transverse and vertical uterine incisions were made at 64% and 29% of centers, respectively. En caul cesarean section was considered useful by 87% of centers. However, nearly one-third of the respondents noted that this procedure presents some technical difficulties if membranes happen to rupture accidentally before the delivery of the fetus is complete. Conclusions: En caul cesarean section is a routine cesarean delivery technique used for preterm\",\"PeriodicalId\":42505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14390/JSSHP.HRP2019-006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14390/JSSHP.HRP2019-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:“全裸”剖宫产术通过故意不使胎膜破裂来防止剖宫产对早产儿的机械损伤。本调查调查了其在日本的流行、适应症和优缺点。方法:向日本所有注册的二级和三级产妇和围产期中心(早产婴儿最多的地方)发放问卷(n = 327)。各中心的百分比以调查结果的形式呈现。结果:有效率为53.2%。二级和三级中心的剖宫产率分别为43.2%和81.6%。在75.9%的中心中,考虑全剖宫产的胎龄小于31周。子宫低位横向切口占64%,垂直切口占29%。87%的中心认为完全剖宫产术是有效的。然而,近三分之一的受访者指出,如果胎膜在胎儿娩出之前意外破裂,这种方法会带来一些技术上的困难。结论:全腹剖宫产术是一种常规的早产儿剖宫产术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cesarean delivery “en caul” in Japan: Results of a national survey of maternal and perinatal centers in Japan
Aim: “En caul” cesarean section can prevent mechanical damage to preterm babies upon cesarean delivery, by intentionally not rupturing the fetal membranes. This survey investigates its prevalence, indications, and advantages and disadvantages in Japan. Methods: Questionnaires were posted to all registered Level 2 and Level 3 maternal and perinatal centers (where most premature babies are delivered) in Japan ( n = 327). Percentages of centers are presented as survey results. Results: Response rate was 53.2%. En caul cesarean section was employed in 43.2% and 81.6% of Level 2 and 3 centers, respectively. Gestational age considered for en caul cesarean section was less than 31 weeks in 75.9% of centers. Low transverse and vertical uterine incisions were made at 64% and 29% of centers, respectively. En caul cesarean section was considered useful by 87% of centers. However, nearly one-third of the respondents noted that this procedure presents some technical difficulties if membranes happen to rupture accidentally before the delivery of the fetus is complete. Conclusions: En caul cesarean section is a routine cesarean delivery technique used for preterm
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信