巴特和豪尔瓦斯政治神学中的教会和国家。比较分析的尝试

Valerii Sekisov
{"title":"巴特和豪尔瓦斯政治神学中的教会和国家。比较分析的尝试","authors":"Valerii Sekisov","doi":"10.33930/ed.2019.5007.33(5)-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper provides analysis of the teachings of K. Barth and S. Hauerwas on the relations between church and state. Unlike the Reformers, Swiss theologian proves the possibility of a positive connection between church and state and points out some ways of its realization. According to K. Barth, both church and state, belong to the Christological sphere, which legitimizes the latter for the church community, as well as calls for mutual service. According to S. Hauerwas, the criterion of power is the legitimization of violence, while the special feature of the church is the ability to make peace. In addition, Hauerwas demonstrates the danger of uncritical acceptance of dominant narratives on the example of liberalism. Thus, on the one hand, the paper demonstrates, the differences in the views of K. Barth and S. Hauerwas, and on the other hand, reflects on common grounds of both theologians, making this research highly relevant today.","PeriodicalId":52865,"journal":{"name":"Osvitnii diskurs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHURCH AND STATE IN THE POLITICAL THEOLOGY OF K. BART AND S. HAUERWAS. AN ATTEMPT OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"Valerii Sekisov\",\"doi\":\"10.33930/ed.2019.5007.33(5)-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper provides analysis of the teachings of K. Barth and S. Hauerwas on the relations between church and state. Unlike the Reformers, Swiss theologian proves the possibility of a positive connection between church and state and points out some ways of its realization. According to K. Barth, both church and state, belong to the Christological sphere, which legitimizes the latter for the church community, as well as calls for mutual service. According to S. Hauerwas, the criterion of power is the legitimization of violence, while the special feature of the church is the ability to make peace. In addition, Hauerwas demonstrates the danger of uncritical acceptance of dominant narratives on the example of liberalism. Thus, on the one hand, the paper demonstrates, the differences in the views of K. Barth and S. Hauerwas, and on the other hand, reflects on common grounds of both theologians, making this research highly relevant today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osvitnii diskurs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osvitnii diskurs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.33(5)-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osvitnii diskurs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.33(5)-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了巴特和豪尔瓦斯关于政教关系的教义。与改革者不同,瑞士神学家证明了教会和国家之间存在积极联系的可能性,并指出了实现这种联系的一些途径。根据K.Barth的说法,教会和国家都属于基督领域,这使后者在教会社区中合法化,并呼吁相互服务。根据S.Hauervas的说法,权力的标准是暴力的合法化,而教会的特殊特征是缔造和平的能力。此外,豪尔瓦斯以自由主义为例,展示了不加批判地接受主流叙事的危险。因此,本文一方面论证了K.Barth和S.Hauervas观点的差异,另一方面也反映了两位神学家的共同点,使这一研究在今天具有高度的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHURCH AND STATE IN THE POLITICAL THEOLOGY OF K. BART AND S. HAUERWAS. AN ATTEMPT OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
The paper provides analysis of the teachings of K. Barth and S. Hauerwas on the relations between church and state. Unlike the Reformers, Swiss theologian proves the possibility of a positive connection between church and state and points out some ways of its realization. According to K. Barth, both church and state, belong to the Christological sphere, which legitimizes the latter for the church community, as well as calls for mutual service. According to S. Hauerwas, the criterion of power is the legitimization of violence, while the special feature of the church is the ability to make peace. In addition, Hauerwas demonstrates the danger of uncritical acceptance of dominant narratives on the example of liberalism. Thus, on the one hand, the paper demonstrates, the differences in the views of K. Barth and S. Hauerwas, and on the other hand, reflects on common grounds of both theologians, making this research highly relevant today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信