对有情绪和行为障碍风险的学生来说，少就是多:评估入住/退房的组成部分

IF 1.7 4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Education and Treatment of Children Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI:10.1353/etc.2019.0022

Meredith A. Weber, S. E. Rich, Candace J. Gann, Gary J. Duhon, Stephanie Smith Kellen

{"title":"对有情绪和行为障碍风险的学生来说，少就是多:评估入住/退房的组成部分","authors":"Meredith A. Weber, S. E. Rich, Candace J. Gann, Gary J. Duhon, Stephanie Smith Kellen","doi":"10.1353/etc.2019.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Check-in/Check-out (CICO) is one of the most commonly utilized and well-established Tier 2 interventions (Horner, Sugai, & Lewis, 2015). Evaluation of CICO components is necessary to inform implementation of adequate prevention and intervention services, as well as evidence-based modifications of intervention intensity for students at risk of developing more severe problem behaviors. The current study utilized a multiple baseline design to examine the minimum amount of in-class feedback required to reduce student problem behavior and increase appropriate behaviors for three fifth grade students in the general education classroom. For all three participants, the first phase evaluated student response to the implementation of morning check-in and afternoon check-out only. Additional in-class feedback was provided for one participant. Results suggest that CICO may be effective in reducing student problem behavior without full implementation of in-class feedback.","PeriodicalId":51493,"journal":{"name":"Education and Treatment of Children","volume":"42 1","pages":"469 - 488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/etc.2019.0022","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Less Be More for Students At-Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Evaluating Components of Check-In/Check-Out\",\"authors\":\"Meredith A. Weber, S. E. Rich, Candace J. Gann, Gary J. Duhon, Stephanie Smith Kellen\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/etc.2019.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Check-in/Check-out (CICO) is one of the most commonly utilized and well-established Tier 2 interventions (Horner, Sugai, & Lewis, 2015). Evaluation of CICO components is necessary to inform implementation of adequate prevention and intervention services, as well as evidence-based modifications of intervention intensity for students at risk of developing more severe problem behaviors. The current study utilized a multiple baseline design to examine the minimum amount of in-class feedback required to reduce student problem behavior and increase appropriate behaviors for three fifth grade students in the general education classroom. For all three participants, the first phase evaluated student response to the implementation of morning check-in and afternoon check-out only. Additional in-class feedback was provided for one participant. Results suggest that CICO may be effective in reducing student problem behavior without full implementation of in-class feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"469 - 488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/etc.2019.0022\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2019.0022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Treatment of Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2019.0022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要：入住/退房（CICO）是最常用和最完善的二级干预措施之一（Horner，Sugai，&Lewis，2015）。对CICO组成部分的评估是必要的，以告知充分的预防和干预服务的实施，以及对有发展更严重问题行为风险的学生的干预强度的循证修改。目前的研究采用了多基线设计来检查三名五年级学生在普通教育课堂上减少学生问题行为和增加适当行为所需的最低课堂反馈量。对于所有三名参与者，第一阶段评估了学生对仅上午入住和下午退房的实施的反应。为一名参与者提供了额外的课堂反馈。结果表明，如果没有充分实施课堂反馈，CICO可能会有效地减少学生的问题行为。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Can Less Be More for Students At-Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Evaluating Components of Check-In/Check-Out

Abstract:Check-in/Check-out (CICO) is one of the most commonly utilized and well-established Tier 2 interventions (Horner, Sugai, & Lewis, 2015). Evaluation of CICO components is necessary to inform implementation of adequate prevention and intervention services, as well as evidence-based modifications of intervention intensity for students at risk of developing more severe problem behaviors. The current study utilized a multiple baseline design to examine the minimum amount of in-class feedback required to reduce student problem behavior and increase appropriate behaviors for three fifth grade students in the general education classroom. For all three participants, the first phase evaluated student response to the implementation of morning check-in and afternoon check-out only. Additional in-class feedback was provided for one participant. Results suggest that CICO may be effective in reducing student problem behavior without full implementation of in-class feedback.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Education and Treatment of Children Multiple-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth who are at risk for or experiencing emotional or behavioral problems. A primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators, parents, child care providers, or mental health professionals in improving the effectiveness of their services. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.