格鲁吉亚rioni和kura盆地的石油系统

IF 1.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. F. Sachsenhofer, A. Bechtel, R. Gratzer, O. Enukidze, A. Janiashvili, W. Nachtmann, A. Sanishvili, N. Tevzadze, M. A. Yukler
{"title":"格鲁吉亚rioni和kura盆地的石油系统","authors":"R. F. Sachsenhofer,&nbsp;A. Bechtel,&nbsp;R. Gratzer,&nbsp;O. Enukidze,&nbsp;A. Janiashvili,&nbsp;W. Nachtmann,&nbsp;A. Sanishvili,&nbsp;N. Tevzadze,&nbsp;M. A. Yukler","doi":"10.1111/jpg.12794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>The Neogene Rioni and Kura foreland basins in Georgia are located between the converging Greater and Lesser Caucasus fold-and-thrust belts. The Rioni Basin continues westward into the Black Sea whereas the Kura Basin extends eastward into Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea. “Pre-” and “post-salt” petroleum systems are distinguished in the Rioni Basin separated by an Upper Jurassic evaporite succession of regional extent. The pre-salt petroleum system in the northern Rioni Basin is still poorly understood. Bathonian shales have generated oil which has been recorded in Middle Jurassic sandstones. However, as the origin of the oil in Upper Jurassic sandstones (e.g. at the Okumi oil discovery) is still problematic, the pre-salt petroleum system remains poorly constrained. Gas-rich, high volatile bituminous coals of Bathonian age may represent a CBM play.</p>\n <p>The post-salt petroleum system in the Rioni Basin is charged by two prolific source rock units: the Middle Eocene Kuma Formation and the Oligo-Miocene Maikop Group. The petroleum potential of the Kuma Formation, which is about 40 m thick, is classified as good to very good. The Oligocene part of the Maikop Group is several hundred metres thick and contains source rocks with up to 5 wt.% TOC in its lower part. Additional source rocks are present in Cretaceous and lower Paleogene levels. Oil is produced from fractured Upper Cretaceous carbonates in anticlinal structures below the Neogene unconformity and from Mio-Pliocene siliciclastics in fault-related anticlines. Trap formation and hydrocarbon accumulation is interpreted to have occurred since Maeotian time. Proven oil reserves are very low (∼2 million tons) and suggest low charge efficiency.</p>\n <p>Several stratigraphic horizons containing potential source rocks are present in the Kura Basin of eastern Georgia. Although oil-source correlations have yielded unsatisfactory results, the Maikop Group is the most likely source rock, despite its relatively poor petroleum potential which is at best “fair” in the Tbilisi area in the west of the basin. Additional potential source rocks include Middle and Upper Eocene shales. Fractured Middle Eocene volcaniclastic rocks are the best producing reservoirs for hydrocarbons, but oil accumulations are also found in fractured Upper Cretaceous carbonates and in Lower and Upper Eocene, Oligocene and Neogene siliciclastics. Biomarker data suggest a Cenozoic (or Upper Cretaceous) source rock containing abundant terrigenous organic matter. Anticlines and positive flower structures related to compressional tectonics in front of the Greater and Lesser Caucasus fold-and-thrust belts form the main trap types. Samgori-Patardzeuli-Ninotsminda in the Tbilisi region is by far the largest oil field in Georgia and accounts for nearly 90% of the cumulative production of the country (28.5 million tons). The field was probably charged from a kitchen area located to the north. Strike-slip faults played a major role as migration pathways. Despite of the presence of many oil seeps, proven reserves in the Georgian part of the Kura Basin are very low (2.4 million tons). This may reflects the presence of traps with poor seal integrity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Geology","volume":"44 3","pages":"287-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jpg.12794","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PETROLEUM SYSTEMS IN THE RIONI AND KURA BASINS OF GEORGIA\",\"authors\":\"R. F. Sachsenhofer,&nbsp;A. Bechtel,&nbsp;R. Gratzer,&nbsp;O. Enukidze,&nbsp;A. Janiashvili,&nbsp;W. Nachtmann,&nbsp;A. Sanishvili,&nbsp;N. Tevzadze,&nbsp;M. A. Yukler\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpg.12794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>The Neogene Rioni and Kura foreland basins in Georgia are located between the converging Greater and Lesser Caucasus fold-and-thrust belts. The Rioni Basin continues westward into the Black Sea whereas the Kura Basin extends eastward into Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea. “Pre-” and “post-salt” petroleum systems are distinguished in the Rioni Basin separated by an Upper Jurassic evaporite succession of regional extent. The pre-salt petroleum system in the northern Rioni Basin is still poorly understood. Bathonian shales have generated oil which has been recorded in Middle Jurassic sandstones. However, as the origin of the oil in Upper Jurassic sandstones (e.g. at the Okumi oil discovery) is still problematic, the pre-salt petroleum system remains poorly constrained. Gas-rich, high volatile bituminous coals of Bathonian age may represent a CBM play.</p>\\n <p>The post-salt petroleum system in the Rioni Basin is charged by two prolific source rock units: the Middle Eocene Kuma Formation and the Oligo-Miocene Maikop Group. The petroleum potential of the Kuma Formation, which is about 40 m thick, is classified as good to very good. The Oligocene part of the Maikop Group is several hundred metres thick and contains source rocks with up to 5 wt.% TOC in its lower part. Additional source rocks are present in Cretaceous and lower Paleogene levels. Oil is produced from fractured Upper Cretaceous carbonates in anticlinal structures below the Neogene unconformity and from Mio-Pliocene siliciclastics in fault-related anticlines. Trap formation and hydrocarbon accumulation is interpreted to have occurred since Maeotian time. Proven oil reserves are very low (∼2 million tons) and suggest low charge efficiency.</p>\\n <p>Several stratigraphic horizons containing potential source rocks are present in the Kura Basin of eastern Georgia. Although oil-source correlations have yielded unsatisfactory results, the Maikop Group is the most likely source rock, despite its relatively poor petroleum potential which is at best “fair” in the Tbilisi area in the west of the basin. Additional potential source rocks include Middle and Upper Eocene shales. Fractured Middle Eocene volcaniclastic rocks are the best producing reservoirs for hydrocarbons, but oil accumulations are also found in fractured Upper Cretaceous carbonates and in Lower and Upper Eocene, Oligocene and Neogene siliciclastics. Biomarker data suggest a Cenozoic (or Upper Cretaceous) source rock containing abundant terrigenous organic matter. Anticlines and positive flower structures related to compressional tectonics in front of the Greater and Lesser Caucasus fold-and-thrust belts form the main trap types. Samgori-Patardzeuli-Ninotsminda in the Tbilisi region is by far the largest oil field in Georgia and accounts for nearly 90% of the cumulative production of the country (28.5 million tons). The field was probably charged from a kitchen area located to the north. Strike-slip faults played a major role as migration pathways. Despite of the presence of many oil seeps, proven reserves in the Georgian part of the Kura Basin are very low (2.4 million tons). This may reflects the presence of traps with poor seal integrity.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Geology\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"287-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jpg.12794\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpg.12794\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpg.12794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

格鲁吉亚新近系里奥尼和库拉前陆盆地位于大高加索褶皱冲断带和小高加索褶皱冲断带之间。里奥尼盆地继续向西进入黑海,而库拉盆地向东延伸到阿塞拜疆和里海。里奥尼盆地以区域范围内的上侏罗统蒸发岩演替为界,划分出“盐前”和“盐后”含油气系统。对里奥尼盆地北部盐下含油气系统的认识尚不充分。在中侏罗统砂岩中有记录的Bathonian页岩生油。然而,由于上侏罗统砂岩(如Okumi石油发现)的石油来源仍然存在问题,盐下含油气系统仍然缺乏约束。澡盆期富气、高挥发性烟煤可能为煤层气储层。里奥尼盆地盐后含油气系统由中始新统Kuma组和渐近-中新统Maikop组两个多产的烃源岩单元控制。Kuma组厚度约40 m,具有良好至极好的油气潜力。迈科普群渐新世部分厚达几百米,下部含TOC高达5%的烃源岩。在白垩纪和下古近纪存在额外的烃源岩。石油产自新近系不整合面以下背斜构造中的裂缝性上白垩统碳酸盐岩和断裂相关背斜中的中新世-上新世硅塑性物。圈闭的形成和油气聚集被解释为发生在马田时代以后。已探明的石油储量非常低(约200万吨),表明充电效率很低。在格鲁吉亚东部的库拉盆地,有几个地层层位含有潜在的烃源岩。虽然油源对比的结果并不令人满意,但Maikop组是最有可能的烃源岩,尽管其石油潜力相对较差,在盆地西部的第比利斯地区最多只能算“一般”。其他潜在烃源岩包括中始新统和上始新统页岩。裂缝性中始新统火山碎屑岩是最佳的油气储集层,但裂缝性上白垩统碳酸盐岩和裂缝性下始新统、渐新统和新近系硅屑岩也有油气聚集。生物标志资料表明,该区为新生代(或上白垩统)烃源岩,含丰富的陆源有机质。大高加索和小高加索褶皱冲断带前与挤压构造有关的背斜和正花构造是主要的圈闭类型。位于第比利斯地区的Samgori-Patardzeuli-Ninotsminda油田是迄今为止格鲁吉亚最大的油田,占该国累计产量(2850万吨)的近90%。电场可能是从位于北面的厨房区充电的。走滑断层是主要的运移通道。尽管存在许多石油渗漏,但库拉盆地格鲁吉亚部分的探明储量非常低(240万吨)。这可能反映出存在密封完整性较差的圈闭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PETROLEUM SYSTEMS IN THE RIONI AND KURA BASINS OF GEORGIA

The Neogene Rioni and Kura foreland basins in Georgia are located between the converging Greater and Lesser Caucasus fold-and-thrust belts. The Rioni Basin continues westward into the Black Sea whereas the Kura Basin extends eastward into Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea. “Pre-” and “post-salt” petroleum systems are distinguished in the Rioni Basin separated by an Upper Jurassic evaporite succession of regional extent. The pre-salt petroleum system in the northern Rioni Basin is still poorly understood. Bathonian shales have generated oil which has been recorded in Middle Jurassic sandstones. However, as the origin of the oil in Upper Jurassic sandstones (e.g. at the Okumi oil discovery) is still problematic, the pre-salt petroleum system remains poorly constrained. Gas-rich, high volatile bituminous coals of Bathonian age may represent a CBM play.

The post-salt petroleum system in the Rioni Basin is charged by two prolific source rock units: the Middle Eocene Kuma Formation and the Oligo-Miocene Maikop Group. The petroleum potential of the Kuma Formation, which is about 40 m thick, is classified as good to very good. The Oligocene part of the Maikop Group is several hundred metres thick and contains source rocks with up to 5 wt.% TOC in its lower part. Additional source rocks are present in Cretaceous and lower Paleogene levels. Oil is produced from fractured Upper Cretaceous carbonates in anticlinal structures below the Neogene unconformity and from Mio-Pliocene siliciclastics in fault-related anticlines. Trap formation and hydrocarbon accumulation is interpreted to have occurred since Maeotian time. Proven oil reserves are very low (∼2 million tons) and suggest low charge efficiency.

Several stratigraphic horizons containing potential source rocks are present in the Kura Basin of eastern Georgia. Although oil-source correlations have yielded unsatisfactory results, the Maikop Group is the most likely source rock, despite its relatively poor petroleum potential which is at best “fair” in the Tbilisi area in the west of the basin. Additional potential source rocks include Middle and Upper Eocene shales. Fractured Middle Eocene volcaniclastic rocks are the best producing reservoirs for hydrocarbons, but oil accumulations are also found in fractured Upper Cretaceous carbonates and in Lower and Upper Eocene, Oligocene and Neogene siliciclastics. Biomarker data suggest a Cenozoic (or Upper Cretaceous) source rock containing abundant terrigenous organic matter. Anticlines and positive flower structures related to compressional tectonics in front of the Greater and Lesser Caucasus fold-and-thrust belts form the main trap types. Samgori-Patardzeuli-Ninotsminda in the Tbilisi region is by far the largest oil field in Georgia and accounts for nearly 90% of the cumulative production of the country (28.5 million tons). The field was probably charged from a kitchen area located to the north. Strike-slip faults played a major role as migration pathways. Despite of the presence of many oil seeps, proven reserves in the Georgian part of the Kura Basin are very low (2.4 million tons). This may reflects the presence of traps with poor seal integrity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Petroleum Geology
Journal of Petroleum Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Petroleum Geology is a quarterly journal devoted to the geology of oil and natural gas. Editorial preference is given to original papers on oilfield regions of the world outside North America and on topics of general application in petroleum exploration and development operations, including geochemical and geophysical studies, basin modelling and reservoir evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信