新型口腔内分角器©和平行RINN®数字成像受体支架在低腭高患者中的有效性和舒适性评估

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Afaf Syahira Ahmad Satmi, Nurkamilya Halimah Fadilah, M. Yusof, N. Manan, J. Mahmud, S. Abdullah
{"title":"新型口腔内分角器©和平行RINN®数字成像受体支架在低腭高患者中的有效性和舒适性评估","authors":"Afaf Syahira Ahmad Satmi, Nurkamilya Halimah Fadilah, M. Yusof, N. Manan, J. Mahmud, S. Abdullah","doi":"10.21315/aos2020.15.1.401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was performed to assess the effectiveness and comfort of two intraoral imaging techniques using respective digital radiograph receptor devices/holder in obtaining digital intraoral images. Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing anterior intraoral periapical radiographs were single-blindly recruited. The imaging procedure was performed by two calibrated researchers where the novel holder group (Bisector©) was prospectively compared to the paralleling technique group, RINN® by performing thirty radiographic examinations, respectively. All patients were randomly segregated into different groups using block randomization method. The effectiveness of both holders was quantified based on the repeat rate percentage and quality of the images. The comfort study was enumerated using the Horizontal Visual Analogue Scale 100mm (HVAS). The Wilcoxon test (alpha = 0.05) was applied to compare the comfort score of different types of imaging receptor device reported by the patients. Results: The repeat rate percentage for Bisector© and RINN® holder devices were 8.9% and 18.6%, respectively (p<0.05). The median range of the \"comfort data\" according to conventional and novel intraoral radiographic receptor holder was 16 mm to 57 mm and 15 mm to 58 mm, respectively. No patients scored more than 74 mm. Conclusion: The Bisector© holder exhibited lower percentage of repeat as compared to the RINN® holder. Both groups did not cause major discomfort (mild-moderate pain). The use of novel intraoral bisecting angle radiographic receptor holder is however recommended to optimize the repeat rate in low palatal height patients.","PeriodicalId":44961,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orofacial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Comfort Assessment of the Novel Intra-oral Bisecting Angle Bisector© and Paralleling RINN® Digital Imaging Receptor Holders in Low Palatal Height Patients\",\"authors\":\"Afaf Syahira Ahmad Satmi, Nurkamilya Halimah Fadilah, M. Yusof, N. Manan, J. Mahmud, S. Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/aos2020.15.1.401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was performed to assess the effectiveness and comfort of two intraoral imaging techniques using respective digital radiograph receptor devices/holder in obtaining digital intraoral images. Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing anterior intraoral periapical radiographs were single-blindly recruited. The imaging procedure was performed by two calibrated researchers where the novel holder group (Bisector©) was prospectively compared to the paralleling technique group, RINN® by performing thirty radiographic examinations, respectively. All patients were randomly segregated into different groups using block randomization method. The effectiveness of both holders was quantified based on the repeat rate percentage and quality of the images. The comfort study was enumerated using the Horizontal Visual Analogue Scale 100mm (HVAS). The Wilcoxon test (alpha = 0.05) was applied to compare the comfort score of different types of imaging receptor device reported by the patients. Results: The repeat rate percentage for Bisector© and RINN® holder devices were 8.9% and 18.6%, respectively (p<0.05). The median range of the \\\"comfort data\\\" according to conventional and novel intraoral radiographic receptor holder was 16 mm to 57 mm and 15 mm to 58 mm, respectively. No patients scored more than 74 mm. Conclusion: The Bisector© holder exhibited lower percentage of repeat as compared to the RINN® holder. Both groups did not cause major discomfort (mild-moderate pain). The use of novel intraoral bisecting angle radiographic receptor holder is however recommended to optimize the repeat rate in low palatal height patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orofacial Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orofacial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/aos2020.15.1.401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/aos2020.15.1.401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究评估了两种口腔内成像技术的有效性和舒适性,使用各自的数字x线片受体装置/支架获得数字口腔内图像。方法:采用单盲方法招募60例接受口腔前路根尖周x线摄影的患者。成像过程由两名校准的研究人员执行,其中新型支架组(Bisector©)与平行技术组(RINN®)分别进行30次放射检查进行前瞻性比较。采用分组随机法将所有患者随机分为不同组。根据图像的重复率百分比和质量来量化两个持有者的有效性。采用100mm水平视觉模拟量表(HVAS)进行舒适性研究。采用Wilcoxon检验(alpha = 0.05)比较患者报告的不同类型成像受体装置的舒适度评分。结果:Bisector©和RINN®支架器械的重复率分别为8.9%和18.6% (p<0.05)。根据传统和新型口内x线片受体支架,“舒适数据”的中位数范围分别为16 mm至57 mm和15 mm至58 mm。没有患者评分超过74 mm。结论:与RINN®支架相比,Bisector©支架的重复率较低。两组均未引起严重不适(轻度至中度疼痛)。然而,在低腭高患者中,推荐使用新型口内分角x线摄影受体支架来优化重复率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and Comfort Assessment of the Novel Intra-oral Bisecting Angle Bisector© and Paralleling RINN® Digital Imaging Receptor Holders in Low Palatal Height Patients
This study was performed to assess the effectiveness and comfort of two intraoral imaging techniques using respective digital radiograph receptor devices/holder in obtaining digital intraoral images. Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing anterior intraoral periapical radiographs were single-blindly recruited. The imaging procedure was performed by two calibrated researchers where the novel holder group (Bisector©) was prospectively compared to the paralleling technique group, RINN® by performing thirty radiographic examinations, respectively. All patients were randomly segregated into different groups using block randomization method. The effectiveness of both holders was quantified based on the repeat rate percentage and quality of the images. The comfort study was enumerated using the Horizontal Visual Analogue Scale 100mm (HVAS). The Wilcoxon test (alpha = 0.05) was applied to compare the comfort score of different types of imaging receptor device reported by the patients. Results: The repeat rate percentage for Bisector© and RINN® holder devices were 8.9% and 18.6%, respectively (p<0.05). The median range of the "comfort data" according to conventional and novel intraoral radiographic receptor holder was 16 mm to 57 mm and 15 mm to 58 mm, respectively. No patients scored more than 74 mm. Conclusion: The Bisector© holder exhibited lower percentage of repeat as compared to the RINN® holder. Both groups did not cause major discomfort (mild-moderate pain). The use of novel intraoral bisecting angle radiographic receptor holder is however recommended to optimize the repeat rate in low palatal height patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Orofacial Science
Archives of Orofacial Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信