Mai Atef, E. Sheikh, M. Ellithy, K. Naguib, Amr Shafik Tawfik
{"title":"比较传统与低分割辅助放疗治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的随机前瞻性研究","authors":"Mai Atef, E. Sheikh, M. Ellithy, K. Naguib, Amr Shafik Tawfik","doi":"10.21608/RESONCOL.2019.12516.1078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in early breast cancer yields equivalent or better outcome in terms of efficacy, toxicity, cosmesis and cost-effectiveness. However, its role in node-positive breast cancer is less clear. \nAim: To compare between adjuvant conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer. \nMethods: Prospective pilot study of 66 node-positive breast cancer patients recruited over 1 year in a single institution. Patients were randomized to receive adjuvant conventional radiotherapy 200 cGy x 25 fractions with 200 cGy x 5 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (control arm) or hypofractionated radiotherapy 266 cGy x 16 fractions with 266 cGy x 4 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (intervention arm). The end points were disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome, ipsilateral arm lymphedema and acute skin reactions. \nResults: Disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms (p = 0.6) and the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 87% and 89% in the hypofractionated and conventional arms. The rate of excellent/good cosmetic score was higher in the hypofractionated arm than the conventional as rated by patients (71% vs. 46%, p = 0.182) and physicians (29% vs. 8%, p = 0.32). Hypofractionation, when compared to conventional fractionation, was associated with less arm lymphedema (22% vs. 40%, p = 0.149), dry desquamation (28% vs. 53%, p = 0.04), skin darkness (0% vs. 15%, p = 0.054) and wet desquamation (16% vs. 21%, p = 0.601). \nConclusion: Hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients is equivalent to conventional fractionation as regards disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome and arm lymphedema with less early skin reactions.","PeriodicalId":33915,"journal":{"name":"Research in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Mai Atef, E. Sheikh, M. Ellithy, K. Naguib, Amr Shafik Tawfik\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/RESONCOL.2019.12516.1078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in early breast cancer yields equivalent or better outcome in terms of efficacy, toxicity, cosmesis and cost-effectiveness. However, its role in node-positive breast cancer is less clear. \\nAim: To compare between adjuvant conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer. \\nMethods: Prospective pilot study of 66 node-positive breast cancer patients recruited over 1 year in a single institution. Patients were randomized to receive adjuvant conventional radiotherapy 200 cGy x 25 fractions with 200 cGy x 5 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (control arm) or hypofractionated radiotherapy 266 cGy x 16 fractions with 266 cGy x 4 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (intervention arm). The end points were disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome, ipsilateral arm lymphedema and acute skin reactions. \\nResults: Disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms (p = 0.6) and the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 87% and 89% in the hypofractionated and conventional arms. The rate of excellent/good cosmetic score was higher in the hypofractionated arm than the conventional as rated by patients (71% vs. 46%, p = 0.182) and physicians (29% vs. 8%, p = 0.32). Hypofractionation, when compared to conventional fractionation, was associated with less arm lymphedema (22% vs. 40%, p = 0.149), dry desquamation (28% vs. 53%, p = 0.04), skin darkness (0% vs. 15%, p = 0.054) and wet desquamation (16% vs. 21%, p = 0.601). \\nConclusion: Hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients is equivalent to conventional fractionation as regards disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome and arm lymphedema with less early skin reactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/RESONCOL.2019.12516.1078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/RESONCOL.2019.12516.1078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:低分割放疗在早期乳腺癌的疗效、毒性、美观性和成本效益方面具有同等或更好的结果。然而,它在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌中的作用尚不清楚。目的:比较常规辅助放疗与低分割放疗对淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的治疗效果。方法:前瞻性试点研究,66名淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者在一个机构招募超过1年。患者随机接受常规辅助放疗,保乳组200 cGy × 25分次,200 cGy × 5分次强化至肿瘤床(对照组);保乳组266 cGy × 16分次,266 cGy × 4分次强化至肿瘤床(干预组)。终点为无病生存期、美容效果、同侧手臂淋巴水肿和急性皮肤反应。结果:两组无病生存率无显著差异(p = 0.6),低分割组和常规组的2年无病生存率分别为87%和89%。患者(71% vs. 46%, p = 0.182)和医生(29% vs. 8%, p = 0.32)对低分割组美容评分优良率均高于常规组。与常规分离术相比,低分离术与手臂淋巴水肿减少(22%对40%,p = 0.149)、干脱屑(28%对53%,p = 0.04)、皮肤暗沉(0%对15%,p = 0.054)和湿脱屑(16%对21%,p = 0.601)相关。结论:低分割辅助放疗在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的无病生存率、美容效果和上臂淋巴水肿方面与常规分割相当,且早期皮肤反应较少。
Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer
Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in early breast cancer yields equivalent or better outcome in terms of efficacy, toxicity, cosmesis and cost-effectiveness. However, its role in node-positive breast cancer is less clear.
Aim: To compare between adjuvant conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer.
Methods: Prospective pilot study of 66 node-positive breast cancer patients recruited over 1 year in a single institution. Patients were randomized to receive adjuvant conventional radiotherapy 200 cGy x 25 fractions with 200 cGy x 5 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (control arm) or hypofractionated radiotherapy 266 cGy x 16 fractions with 266 cGy x 4 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (intervention arm). The end points were disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome, ipsilateral arm lymphedema and acute skin reactions.
Results: Disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms (p = 0.6) and the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 87% and 89% in the hypofractionated and conventional arms. The rate of excellent/good cosmetic score was higher in the hypofractionated arm than the conventional as rated by patients (71% vs. 46%, p = 0.182) and physicians (29% vs. 8%, p = 0.32). Hypofractionation, when compared to conventional fractionation, was associated with less arm lymphedema (22% vs. 40%, p = 0.149), dry desquamation (28% vs. 53%, p = 0.04), skin darkness (0% vs. 15%, p = 0.054) and wet desquamation (16% vs. 21%, p = 0.601).
Conclusion: Hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients is equivalent to conventional fractionation as regards disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome and arm lymphedema with less early skin reactions.