乳品加工厂食品安全培训实施方式案例研究

Q4 Medicine
C. Stevenson
{"title":"乳品加工厂食品安全培训实施方式案例研究","authors":"C. Stevenson","doi":"10.4315/fpt-22-017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer-based and supervisor-led trainings are the most common approaches to training employees on food safety across the food industry. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of training format on changes in food safety knowledge, intentions, and compliance. Individualized and group trainings were developed using behaviorism and constructivism learning theories on four food safety topics. The training programs were implemented at 66 dairy processing plants. Pre- and posttest evaluations were received from 793 employees at 22 dairy plants using a validated evaluation method. Data were collected in the form of 14 pre- and posttraining supervisor audits and employee surveys. Group trainings that involved direct instruction and social learning methods were more effective for increasing knowledge than were individual trainings utilizing programmed instruction. The change in noncompliance associated with receiving training was not significantly different, however, possibly due to the limitations of the study such as the small sample size. Regressions also revealed that knowledge was a significant positive predictor of compliance, whereas intention was not.","PeriodicalId":38649,"journal":{"name":"Food Protection Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case Study of Food Safety Training Delivery Methods in Dairy Processing Plants\",\"authors\":\"C. Stevenson\",\"doi\":\"10.4315/fpt-22-017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computer-based and supervisor-led trainings are the most common approaches to training employees on food safety across the food industry. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of training format on changes in food safety knowledge, intentions, and compliance. Individualized and group trainings were developed using behaviorism and constructivism learning theories on four food safety topics. The training programs were implemented at 66 dairy processing plants. Pre- and posttest evaluations were received from 793 employees at 22 dairy plants using a validated evaluation method. Data were collected in the form of 14 pre- and posttraining supervisor audits and employee surveys. Group trainings that involved direct instruction and social learning methods were more effective for increasing knowledge than were individual trainings utilizing programmed instruction. The change in noncompliance associated with receiving training was not significantly different, however, possibly due to the limitations of the study such as the small sample size. Regressions also revealed that knowledge was a significant positive predictor of compliance, whereas intention was not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Protection Trends\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Protection Trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4315/fpt-22-017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Protection Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4315/fpt-22-017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在整个食品行业,以计算机为基础的和主管领导的培训是对员工进行食品安全培训的最常见方法。本研究旨在评估培训形式对食品安全知识、意图和依从性变化的影响。运用行为主义和建构主义学习理论对四个食品安全主题进行个性化和小组培训。培训项目在66家乳制品加工厂实施。采用一种经过验证的评估方法,对22家乳制品厂的793名员工进行了测试前和测试后的评估。数据以14次培训前后主管审计和员工调查的形式收集。采用直接指导和社会学习方法的团体培训比采用程序化教学的个人培训更有效地增加知识。然而,与接受培训相关的不依从性变化并没有显著差异,这可能是由于研究的局限性,如样本量小。回归还显示,知识是依从性的显著正向预测因子,而意图则不是。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Case Study of Food Safety Training Delivery Methods in Dairy Processing Plants
Computer-based and supervisor-led trainings are the most common approaches to training employees on food safety across the food industry. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of training format on changes in food safety knowledge, intentions, and compliance. Individualized and group trainings were developed using behaviorism and constructivism learning theories on four food safety topics. The training programs were implemented at 66 dairy processing plants. Pre- and posttest evaluations were received from 793 employees at 22 dairy plants using a validated evaluation method. Data were collected in the form of 14 pre- and posttraining supervisor audits and employee surveys. Group trainings that involved direct instruction and social learning methods were more effective for increasing knowledge than were individual trainings utilizing programmed instruction. The change in noncompliance associated with receiving training was not significantly different, however, possibly due to the limitations of the study such as the small sample size. Regressions also revealed that knowledge was a significant positive predictor of compliance, whereas intention was not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Protection Trends
Food Protection Trends Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信