{"title":"评估避免超调鼠标指向操作中的时间延迟和空间间隙","authors":"Shota Yamanaka","doi":"10.20380/GI2020.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For hover-based UIs (e.g., pop-up windows) and scrollable UIs, we investigated mouse-pointing performance for users trying to avoid overshooting a target while aiming for it. Three experiments were conducted with a 1D pointing task in which overshooting was accepted (a) within a temporal delay, (b) via a spatial gap between the target and an unintended item, and (c) with both a delay and a gap. We found that, in general, movement times tended to increase with a shorter delay and a smaller gap if these parameters were independently tested. Therefore, Fitts’ law cannot accurately predict the movement times when various values of delay and/or gap are used. We found that 800 ms is required to remove negative effects of distractor for densely arranged targets, but we found no optimal gap.","PeriodicalId":93493,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)","volume":"1 1","pages":"440-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Temporal Delays and Spatial Gaps in Overshoot-avoiding Mouse-pointing Operations\",\"authors\":\"Shota Yamanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.20380/GI2020.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For hover-based UIs (e.g., pop-up windows) and scrollable UIs, we investigated mouse-pointing performance for users trying to avoid overshooting a target while aiming for it. Three experiments were conducted with a 1D pointing task in which overshooting was accepted (a) within a temporal delay, (b) via a spatial gap between the target and an unintended item, and (c) with both a delay and a gap. We found that, in general, movement times tended to increase with a shorter delay and a smaller gap if these parameters were independently tested. Therefore, Fitts’ law cannot accurately predict the movement times when various values of delay and/or gap are used. We found that 800 ms is required to remove negative effects of distractor for densely arranged targets, but we found no optimal gap.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"440-451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2020.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2020.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating Temporal Delays and Spatial Gaps in Overshoot-avoiding Mouse-pointing Operations
For hover-based UIs (e.g., pop-up windows) and scrollable UIs, we investigated mouse-pointing performance for users trying to avoid overshooting a target while aiming for it. Three experiments were conducted with a 1D pointing task in which overshooting was accepted (a) within a temporal delay, (b) via a spatial gap between the target and an unintended item, and (c) with both a delay and a gap. We found that, in general, movement times tended to increase with a shorter delay and a smaller gap if these parameters were independently tested. Therefore, Fitts’ law cannot accurately predict the movement times when various values of delay and/or gap are used. We found that 800 ms is required to remove negative effects of distractor for densely arranged targets, but we found no optimal gap.