内镜下粘膜剥离术治疗早期大鳞癌的牵引辅助方法

M. Yoshida
{"title":"内镜下粘膜剥离术治疗早期大鳞癌的牵引辅助方法","authors":"M. Yoshida","doi":"10.21037/aoe-2020-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endoscopic resection is a minimally-invasive treatment for superficial esophageal tumors compared with surgery or chemoradiation therapy. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a wellestablished method with accurate histological evaluation and favorable procedural outcomes. However, ESD requires a high level of skill, and is therefore technically challenging and time-consuming. Traction-assisted ESD has been introduced to facilitate ESD and provides adequate submucosal visualization and satisfactory tissue traction. We reviewed the scientific literature in English to evaluate the efficacy of traction-assisted ESD for esophageal lesions, including the clip-with-thread (CT) method and the submucosal tunneling (ST) method. The CT method is a simple and affordable technique that uses commercially available hemoclips. Two randomized controlled trials and two retrospective studies showed that the CT method resulted in shorter procedure times and reduced local injection compared with conventional ESD, and no cases of perforation. The ST method does not require specific devices and facilitates the procedure by securing a stable submucosal visual field and maintaining a submucosal liquid cushion. Two retrospective studies reported shorter procedure times with similar en bloc resection rates and complete resection rates using the ST method compared with conventional ESD. Although a combination of the ST method with the CT method seems to be effective for large lesions, its efficacy and safety should be confirmed by a largescale study. In the future, robotic traction has a great potential to be a breakthrough for esophageal ESD, providing appropriate and multi-directional traction to the lesions via an operator-controlled robotic arm. There is no doubt that traction assistance is key to facilitating esophageal ESD. Further studies are needed to elucidate the best method from the perspective of efficacy, safety, and cost.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large early squamous cell carcinoma—traction assisted methods\",\"authors\":\"M. Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/aoe-2020-34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Endoscopic resection is a minimally-invasive treatment for superficial esophageal tumors compared with surgery or chemoradiation therapy. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a wellestablished method with accurate histological evaluation and favorable procedural outcomes. However, ESD requires a high level of skill, and is therefore technically challenging and time-consuming. Traction-assisted ESD has been introduced to facilitate ESD and provides adequate submucosal visualization and satisfactory tissue traction. We reviewed the scientific literature in English to evaluate the efficacy of traction-assisted ESD for esophageal lesions, including the clip-with-thread (CT) method and the submucosal tunneling (ST) method. The CT method is a simple and affordable technique that uses commercially available hemoclips. Two randomized controlled trials and two retrospective studies showed that the CT method resulted in shorter procedure times and reduced local injection compared with conventional ESD, and no cases of perforation. The ST method does not require specific devices and facilitates the procedure by securing a stable submucosal visual field and maintaining a submucosal liquid cushion. Two retrospective studies reported shorter procedure times with similar en bloc resection rates and complete resection rates using the ST method compared with conventional ESD. Although a combination of the ST method with the CT method seems to be effective for large lesions, its efficacy and safety should be confirmed by a largescale study. In the future, robotic traction has a great potential to be a breakthrough for esophageal ESD, providing appropriate and multi-directional traction to the lesions via an operator-controlled robotic arm. There is no doubt that traction assistance is key to facilitating esophageal ESD. Further studies are needed to elucidate the best method from the perspective of efficacy, safety, and cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoe-2020-34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoe-2020-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与手术或放化疗相比,内镜下切除术是一种微创治疗浅表食管肿瘤的方法。内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一种成熟的方法,具有准确的组织学评估和良好的手术结果。然而,ESD需要高水平的技能,因此在技术上具有挑战性且耗时。牵引辅助ESD已被引入以促进ESD,并提供充分的粘膜下可视化和令人满意的组织牵引。我们回顾了英文科学文献,以评估牵引辅助ESD治疗食管病变的疗效,包括线夹法(CT)和黏膜下隧道法(ST)。CT方法是一种简单且价格合理的技术,使用商业上可用的止血夹。两项随机对照试验和两项回顾性研究表明,与传统ESD相比,CT方法缩短了手术时间,减少了局部注射,并且没有穿孔病例。ST方法不需要特定的装置,并通过确保稳定的粘膜下视野和保持粘膜下液体垫来促进手术。两项回顾性研究报告称,与传统ESD相比,ST方法的手术时间更短,整体切除率和完全切除率相似。尽管ST方法和CT方法相结合似乎对大面积病变有效,但其有效性和安全性应通过大规模研究来证实。在未来,机器人牵引有很大的潜力成为食道ESD的突破,通过操作员控制的机械臂为病变提供适当的多向牵引。毫无疑问,牵引辅助是促进食道ESD的关键。需要进一步的研究来从疗效、安全性和成本的角度阐明最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large early squamous cell carcinoma—traction assisted methods
Endoscopic resection is a minimally-invasive treatment for superficial esophageal tumors compared with surgery or chemoradiation therapy. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a wellestablished method with accurate histological evaluation and favorable procedural outcomes. However, ESD requires a high level of skill, and is therefore technically challenging and time-consuming. Traction-assisted ESD has been introduced to facilitate ESD and provides adequate submucosal visualization and satisfactory tissue traction. We reviewed the scientific literature in English to evaluate the efficacy of traction-assisted ESD for esophageal lesions, including the clip-with-thread (CT) method and the submucosal tunneling (ST) method. The CT method is a simple and affordable technique that uses commercially available hemoclips. Two randomized controlled trials and two retrospective studies showed that the CT method resulted in shorter procedure times and reduced local injection compared with conventional ESD, and no cases of perforation. The ST method does not require specific devices and facilitates the procedure by securing a stable submucosal visual field and maintaining a submucosal liquid cushion. Two retrospective studies reported shorter procedure times with similar en bloc resection rates and complete resection rates using the ST method compared with conventional ESD. Although a combination of the ST method with the CT method seems to be effective for large lesions, its efficacy and safety should be confirmed by a largescale study. In the future, robotic traction has a great potential to be a breakthrough for esophageal ESD, providing appropriate and multi-directional traction to the lesions via an operator-controlled robotic arm. There is no doubt that traction assistance is key to facilitating esophageal ESD. Further studies are needed to elucidate the best method from the perspective of efficacy, safety, and cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信