关于预测三维可打印性的流变试验的选择

IF 3 2区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Y. Liu, M. Hildner, Omkar Roy, William A. Van den Bogert, James H. Lorenz, Maude Desroches, K. Koppi, A. Shih, Ronald G. Larson
{"title":"关于预测三维可打印性的流变试验的选择","authors":"Y. Liu, M. Hildner, Omkar Roy, William A. Van den Bogert, James H. Lorenz, Maude Desroches, K. Koppi, A. Shih, Ronald G. Larson","doi":"10.1122/8.0000612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct ink writing is used to print multiple polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mixtures with fumed silica or as a two-part commercial liquid silicone rubber (LSR) mixed with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or as a two-part commercial vulcanizing (RTV) silicone. We correlate their printability into a hollow slump cone with rheological measurements, including (1) a shear rate up-ramp followed by (2) a down-ramp in the shear rate, (3) creep tests, and (4) large-amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) with increasing amplitude. The PDMS-fumed silica mixtures fail to print even at the highest fumed silica loading used (9 wt. %), while LSR-PEG with 4 or 6 wt. % PEG prints well, and one of the two RTV silicone components is printable, as is the mixture due in part to its rapid chemical curing. The large differences in printability of these materials do not correlate well with any single rheological test. They do correlate with a combination of a measure of material strength, given by either the yield stress σycr from creep tests or the “flow stress” σf at which G′ and G″ cross-over in LAOS, and of material recoverability given by the dynamic yield stress σy− in test 2. The latter is measured during a down-ramp in the shear rate after reaching a maximum shear rate of 1000 s−1, the highest shear rate in the print nozzle.","PeriodicalId":16991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the selection of rheological tests for the prediction of 3D printability\",\"authors\":\"Y. Liu, M. Hildner, Omkar Roy, William A. Van den Bogert, James H. Lorenz, Maude Desroches, K. Koppi, A. Shih, Ronald G. Larson\",\"doi\":\"10.1122/8.0000612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Direct ink writing is used to print multiple polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mixtures with fumed silica or as a two-part commercial liquid silicone rubber (LSR) mixed with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or as a two-part commercial vulcanizing (RTV) silicone. We correlate their printability into a hollow slump cone with rheological measurements, including (1) a shear rate up-ramp followed by (2) a down-ramp in the shear rate, (3) creep tests, and (4) large-amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) with increasing amplitude. The PDMS-fumed silica mixtures fail to print even at the highest fumed silica loading used (9 wt. %), while LSR-PEG with 4 or 6 wt. % PEG prints well, and one of the two RTV silicone components is printable, as is the mixture due in part to its rapid chemical curing. The large differences in printability of these materials do not correlate well with any single rheological test. They do correlate with a combination of a measure of material strength, given by either the yield stress σycr from creep tests or the “flow stress” σf at which G′ and G″ cross-over in LAOS, and of material recoverability given by the dynamic yield stress σy− in test 2. The latter is measured during a down-ramp in the shear rate after reaching a maximum shear rate of 1000 s−1, the highest shear rate in the print nozzle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rheology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rheology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000612\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000612","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

直接墨水书写用于打印具有气相二氧化硅的多种聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)混合物,或作为与聚乙二醇(PEG)混合的两部分商业液体硅橡胶(LSR),或作为两部分商业硫化(RTV)硅酮。我们将它们在空心坍落度锥中的可打印性与流变测量相关联,包括(1)剪切速率上升斜坡,然后是(2)剪切速率下降斜坡,(3)蠕变试验,以及(4)振幅增加的大振幅振荡剪切(LAOS)。PDMS气相二氧化硅混合物即使在使用的最高气相二氧化硅负载下也无法打印(9 重量。 %), 而具有4或6的LSR-PEG 重量。 % PEG打印良好,两种RTV有机硅成分中的一种可以打印,混合物也是如此,部分原因是其快速化学固化。这些材料可印刷性的巨大差异与任何单一的流变学测试都没有很好的相关性。它们确实与材料强度的测量值(由蠕变试验的屈服应力σycr或LAOS中G′和G〃交叉时的“流动应力”σf给出)和试验2中动态屈服应力∑y−给出的材料可恢复性的组合相关联。后者是在达到1000的最大剪切速率之后的剪切速率的下降斜坡期间测量的 s−1,打印喷嘴中的最高剪切速率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the selection of rheological tests for the prediction of 3D printability
Direct ink writing is used to print multiple polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mixtures with fumed silica or as a two-part commercial liquid silicone rubber (LSR) mixed with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or as a two-part commercial vulcanizing (RTV) silicone. We correlate their printability into a hollow slump cone with rheological measurements, including (1) a shear rate up-ramp followed by (2) a down-ramp in the shear rate, (3) creep tests, and (4) large-amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) with increasing amplitude. The PDMS-fumed silica mixtures fail to print even at the highest fumed silica loading used (9 wt. %), while LSR-PEG with 4 or 6 wt. % PEG prints well, and one of the two RTV silicone components is printable, as is the mixture due in part to its rapid chemical curing. The large differences in printability of these materials do not correlate well with any single rheological test. They do correlate with a combination of a measure of material strength, given by either the yield stress σycr from creep tests or the “flow stress” σf at which G′ and G″ cross-over in LAOS, and of material recoverability given by the dynamic yield stress σy− in test 2. The latter is measured during a down-ramp in the shear rate after reaching a maximum shear rate of 1000 s−1, the highest shear rate in the print nozzle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rheology
Journal of Rheology 物理-力学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
100
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheology, formerly the Transactions of The Society of Rheology, is published six times per year by The Society of Rheology, a member society of the American Institute of Physics, through AIP Publishing. It provides in-depth interdisciplinary coverage of theoretical and experimental issues drawn from industry and academia. The Journal of Rheology is published for professionals and students in chemistry, physics, engineering, material science, and mathematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信