教授和机构的特点:与读写方法课程中技术使用和教师准备的关系

Q1 Social Sciences
Tanya Christ, Poonam Arya, M. Chiu
{"title":"教授和机构的特点:与读写方法课程中技术使用和教师准备的关系","authors":"Tanya Christ, Poonam Arya, M. Chiu","doi":"10.1080/21532974.2021.1998811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One-hundred ninety-nine literacy professors responded to an online survey. A multivariate outcome logit/probit model was used to analyze these data to determine how professor and institution characteristics were related to (a) technologies that professors use in their courses, (b) technologies that professors prepare teachers to use, (b) teaching methods that professors use to prepare teachers, and (c) strategies that professors prepare teachers to use in K-12 instruction. While some institutional characteristics predicted literacy teacher preparation, professor characteristics predominantly predicted how teachers were prepared to integrate technologies in literacy instruction, especially professors’ knowledge, comfort with using technologies, and their rank.","PeriodicalId":52191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","volume":"38 1","pages":"33 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professor and institution characteristics: Relations to technology use and teacher preparation in literacy methods courses\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Christ, Poonam Arya, M. Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21532974.2021.1998811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract One-hundred ninety-nine literacy professors responded to an online survey. A multivariate outcome logit/probit model was used to analyze these data to determine how professor and institution characteristics were related to (a) technologies that professors use in their courses, (b) technologies that professors prepare teachers to use, (b) teaching methods that professors use to prepare teachers, and (c) strategies that professors prepare teachers to use in K-12 instruction. While some institutional characteristics predicted literacy teacher preparation, professor characteristics predominantly predicted how teachers were prepared to integrate technologies in literacy instruction, especially professors’ knowledge, comfort with using technologies, and their rank.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1998811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1998811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

199位识字教授参与了一项在线调查。使用多元结果logit/probit模型来分析这些数据,以确定教授和机构特征如何与(A)教授在课程中使用的技术,(b)教授培养教师使用的技术,(b)教授培养教师使用的教学方法,以及(c)教授培养教师在K-12教学中使用的策略相关。虽然一些机构特征预测了扫盲教师的准备,但教授特征主要预测了教师如何准备将技术整合到扫盲教学中,尤其是教授的知识、使用技术的舒适度以及他们的等级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professor and institution characteristics: Relations to technology use and teacher preparation in literacy methods courses
Abstract One-hundred ninety-nine literacy professors responded to an online survey. A multivariate outcome logit/probit model was used to analyze these data to determine how professor and institution characteristics were related to (a) technologies that professors use in their courses, (b) technologies that professors prepare teachers to use, (b) teaching methods that professors use to prepare teachers, and (c) strategies that professors prepare teachers to use in K-12 instruction. While some institutional characteristics predicted literacy teacher preparation, professor characteristics predominantly predicted how teachers were prepared to integrate technologies in literacy instruction, especially professors’ knowledge, comfort with using technologies, and their rank.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信