詹金森的残余:加拿大档案评估话语中的定居者档案理论观察

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Hodge, S. Nantel, Chris Trainor
{"title":"詹金森的残余:加拿大档案评估话语中的定居者档案理论观察","authors":"S. Hodge, S. Nantel, Chris Trainor","doi":"10.1080/23257962.2022.2037415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper aims to critically reflect on Jenkinson’s archival appraisal methods and concepts and whether they may still influence practice within the Canadian archival context and, if so, is that influence reconcilable within the evolving archival landscape? The Manual provided a concrete set of guidelines created in a particular time period, within a specific societal context, under specific circumstances that no longer reflect postcolonial realities and decolonization efforts. The 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Calls to Action and the subsequent response work by the Steering Committee on Canada’s Archives indicate that the profession is necessarily evolving with the aim of an inclusive, community-based approach to archival appraisal and practice. A contributing element to these changes to praxis must be a confrontation of all colonial and settler archival theory, such as Jenkinson’s writing, that is often presented as foundational within archival education, and as a mainstay in our professional mythology.","PeriodicalId":42972,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association","volume":"43 1","pages":"147 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remnants of Jenkinson: observations on settler archival theory in Canadian archival appraisal discourse\",\"authors\":\"S. Hodge, S. Nantel, Chris Trainor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23257962.2022.2037415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper aims to critically reflect on Jenkinson’s archival appraisal methods and concepts and whether they may still influence practice within the Canadian archival context and, if so, is that influence reconcilable within the evolving archival landscape? The Manual provided a concrete set of guidelines created in a particular time period, within a specific societal context, under specific circumstances that no longer reflect postcolonial realities and decolonization efforts. The 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Calls to Action and the subsequent response work by the Steering Committee on Canada’s Archives indicate that the profession is necessarily evolving with the aim of an inclusive, community-based approach to archival appraisal and practice. A contributing element to these changes to praxis must be a confrontation of all colonial and settler archival theory, such as Jenkinson’s writing, that is often presented as foundational within archival education, and as a mainstay in our professional mythology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"147 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2022.2037415\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2022.2037415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文旨在批判性地反思詹金森的档案评估方法和概念,以及它们是否仍会影响加拿大档案环境中的实践,如果是,这种影响在不断发展的档案环境中是否可以调和?《手册》提供了一套具体的指导方针,这些指导方针是在特定的时间段、特定的社会背景下、在不再反映后殖民现实和非殖民化努力的特定情况下制定的。2015年的《真相与和解行动呼吁》以及加拿大档案指导委员会随后的应对工作表明,该专业必然在发展,其目标是对档案评估和实践采取包容性、基于社区的方法。这些实践变化的一个促成因素必须是与所有殖民地和定居者档案理论的对抗,比如詹金森的著作,这通常被认为是档案教育的基础,也是我们职业神话中的支柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remnants of Jenkinson: observations on settler archival theory in Canadian archival appraisal discourse
ABSTRACT This paper aims to critically reflect on Jenkinson’s archival appraisal methods and concepts and whether they may still influence practice within the Canadian archival context and, if so, is that influence reconcilable within the evolving archival landscape? The Manual provided a concrete set of guidelines created in a particular time period, within a specific societal context, under specific circumstances that no longer reflect postcolonial realities and decolonization efforts. The 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Calls to Action and the subsequent response work by the Steering Committee on Canada’s Archives indicate that the profession is necessarily evolving with the aim of an inclusive, community-based approach to archival appraisal and practice. A contributing element to these changes to praxis must be a confrontation of all colonial and settler archival theory, such as Jenkinson’s writing, that is often presented as foundational within archival education, and as a mainstay in our professional mythology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信