激励机制和联系方式对调查小组教师招聘的影响

Michael Robbins, Jennifer Hawes-Dawson
{"title":"激励机制和联系方式对调查小组教师招聘的影响","authors":"Michael Robbins, Jennifer Hawes-Dawson","doi":"10.29115/sp-2020-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses an experiment run at the beginning of an effort to substantially enlarge the RAND American Teacher Panel, a nationally representative sample of K-12 public school teachers. Ten strategies were evaluated. We considered different modes of contact (FedEx vs. US Postal Service \\[USPS\\]), contingency status of incentives (pre- vs. promised incentive), amounts of incentive ($2, $10, $40, or $60), and types of incentive (cash, check, gift card, electronic). Strategies were compared in terms of response rate and cost effectiveness. Our study yielded several findings that should advance the literature: The use of FedEx clearly outperforms USPS, and the use of a moderate preincentive ($10) outperforms much larger promised incentives (up to $60) with respect to both responsiveness and cost-effectiveness. In addition, cash and check seem preferable to gift cards. Finally, we assess the potential for nonresponse bias by comparing enrollees to nonresponders across a variety of demographic characteristics for each strategy.","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":"13 1","pages":"17882"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Incentives and Mode of Contact on the Recruitment of Teachers into Survey Panels\",\"authors\":\"Michael Robbins, Jennifer Hawes-Dawson\",\"doi\":\"10.29115/sp-2020-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses an experiment run at the beginning of an effort to substantially enlarge the RAND American Teacher Panel, a nationally representative sample of K-12 public school teachers. Ten strategies were evaluated. We considered different modes of contact (FedEx vs. US Postal Service \\\\[USPS\\\\]), contingency status of incentives (pre- vs. promised incentive), amounts of incentive ($2, $10, $40, or $60), and types of incentive (cash, check, gift card, electronic). Strategies were compared in terms of response rate and cost effectiveness. Our study yielded several findings that should advance the literature: The use of FedEx clearly outperforms USPS, and the use of a moderate preincentive ($10) outperforms much larger promised incentives (up to $60) with respect to both responsiveness and cost-effectiveness. In addition, cash and check seem preferable to gift cards. Finally, we assess the potential for nonresponse bias by comparing enrollees to nonresponders across a variety of demographic characteristics for each strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey practice\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"17882\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2020-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2020-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了一项实验,该实验是在实质性扩大兰德美国教师小组的努力开始时进行的,该小组是一个具有全国代表性的K-12公立学校教师样本。评估了10种策略。我们考虑了不同的联系模式(联邦快递vs美国邮政服务\[USPS\])、奖励的应急状态(预先奖励vs承诺奖励)、奖励的数量($2, $ 10、$40, or $ 60)和奖励的类型(现金、支票、礼品卡、电子)。在反应率和成本效益方面比较策略。我们的研究产生了几个应该推进文献的发现:使用联邦快递明显优于USPS,使用适度的预激励($10) outperforms much larger promised incentives (up to $ 60)在响应性和成本效益方面。此外,现金和支票似乎比礼品卡更受欢迎。最后,我们通过比较每个策略的各种人口统计学特征的入组者和无反应者来评估无反应偏倚的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Incentives and Mode of Contact on the Recruitment of Teachers into Survey Panels
This article discusses an experiment run at the beginning of an effort to substantially enlarge the RAND American Teacher Panel, a nationally representative sample of K-12 public school teachers. Ten strategies were evaluated. We considered different modes of contact (FedEx vs. US Postal Service \[USPS\]), contingency status of incentives (pre- vs. promised incentive), amounts of incentive ($2, $10, $40, or $60), and types of incentive (cash, check, gift card, electronic). Strategies were compared in terms of response rate and cost effectiveness. Our study yielded several findings that should advance the literature: The use of FedEx clearly outperforms USPS, and the use of a moderate preincentive ($10) outperforms much larger promised incentives (up to $60) with respect to both responsiveness and cost-effectiveness. In addition, cash and check seem preferable to gift cards. Finally, we assess the potential for nonresponse bias by comparing enrollees to nonresponders across a variety of demographic characteristics for each strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信